Nwanne v. Intagram Incorporate/Meta et al

Filing 11

SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re: 9 , Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 5/10/2024. Show Cause Response due by 5/31/2024. Joint Case Management Statement due by 7/30/2024. Initial Case Management Co nference set for 8/6/2024 01:30 PM in Oakland, this proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar. Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/kaw General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedin gs, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited. Zoom guidance and setup: https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/ (wft, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

JANE NWANNE,
Plaintiff,

8
9
10
11

v.
INTAGRAM INCORPORATE/META, et
al.,

Case No. 4:23-cv-04296-KAW
SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE;
ORDER CONTINUING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Re: Dkt. No. 9

United States District Court
Northern District of California

Defendants.
12
13

This action was filed on August 22, 2023. (Dkt. No. 1.) Pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the

14

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff has 90 days to complete service of the complaint and

15

summons on Defendant, such that November 30, 2023 was the last day to complete service or to

16

file a Motion for Administrative Relief from the deadline pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-11. The Case

17

Management Conference (“CMC”), originally scheduled for November 21, 2023, was continued

18

to January 23, 2024, because Defendants had not been served 7 days prior to the original CMC

19

date. (Dkt. No. 7.)

20

On January 23, 2024, the Court issued an order to show cause as to why the case should

21

not be dismissed for failure to comply with the deadline to complete service on Defendants or to

22

file a Motion for Administrative Relief. (Dkt. No. 9.) Plaintiff’s response was due by February 23,

23

2024. Id. Plaintiff was also ordered to serve Defendants and file a certificate of service by that

24

same date. Id. To date, Plaintiff has not filed a certificate of service or otherwise responded to the

25

first order to show cause.

26

Accordingly, the Court issues a SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, by no later than

27

May 31, 2024, Plaintiff shall explain why this case should not be dismissed for failure to comply

28

with the deadline to complete service on Defendant or to file a Motion for Administrative Relief,

1

and why she did not respond to the January 23, 2024 order to show cause. Also, by May 31, 2024,

2

Plaintiff shall serve Defendants and file a certificate of service on the docket.

3

Plaintiff is advised that the failure to timely respond to this order to show cause and

4

complete service on Defendants will result in this case being reassigned to a district judge with the

5

recommendation that the case be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with Federal

6

Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m).
Finally, the case management conference scheduled for May 28, 2024 is continued to

7
8

August 6, 2024 at 1:30 PM. The joint case management statement is due on or before July 30,

9

2024.

10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 10, 2024
__________________________________
KANDIS A. WESTMORE
United States Magistrate Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2