Frazier v. U.S. Bank National Association et al

Filing 20

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge Jon S. Tigar granting 19 Stipulation. Civil case terminated. (kc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2024)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Joan B. Tucker Fife (SBN 144572)
[e-mail]
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
101 California Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-5840
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Emilie C. Woodhead (SBN 240464)
[e-mail]
Winston K. Hu (SBN 306677)
[e-mail]
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
333 S. Grand Ave.
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1543
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

11

Attorneys for Defendant
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

12

Additional Counsel – Next Page

13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16
17

KALIEN FRAZIER, on behalf of himself and
others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,

18
19
20
21
22

vs.
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, and
DOES 1 to 100, inclusive,

Case No. 4:23-cv-05675
JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Judge: Hon. Jon S. Tigar

Defendant.

23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

1

CASE NO. 4:23-cv-05675

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Joseph Lavi
[e-mail]
Vincent C. Granberry
[e-mail]
Cassandra Castro
[e-mail]
LAVI & EBRAHIMIAN, LLP
8889 W. Olympic Blvd,
Suite 200
Beverly Hills, CA 90211
Telephone:
Facsimile:
Email:

[phone]
[phone]

Attorneys for Plaintiff
KALIEN FRAZIER

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

2

CASE NO. 4:23-cv-05675

1
2

STIPULATION TO DIMISS
Plaintiff KALIEN FRAZIER (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant U.S. BANK NATIONAL

3

ASSOCIATION (“Defendant”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective,

4

undersigned counsel, hereby jointly stipulate and agree that Kalien Frazier hereby dismisses without

5

prejudice the entire action and all claims being asserted against Defendant in the above-captioned action

6

pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Each side shall bear its own

7

costs and attorneys’ fees.

8
9
10

WHEREFORE, the Parties hereby request that the Court dismiss this case without prejudice, with
each Party to bear his or its own costs and attorneys’ fees.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.

11
12

Dated: June 4, 2024

13

LAVI & EBRAHIMIAN, LLP
By:/s/ Cassandra Castro
Joseph Lavi
Vincent C. Granberry
Cassandra Castro
Attorneys for Plaintiff
KALIEN FRAZIER

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

Dated: June 4, 2024

WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
By:/s/ Emilie C. Woodhead
Joan B. Tucker Fife
Emilie C. Woodhead
Winston K. Hu
Attorneys for Defendant
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

3

CASE NO. 4:23-cv-05675

1
2
3

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 5-1 (i)(3)
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1 (i)(3), regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that the
concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from its signatories.

4
5

Dated: June 4, 2024
/s/Emilie C. Woodhead
Emilie C. Woodhead

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

1

CASE NO. 4:23-cv-05675

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL

2

Pursuant to the Stipulation of all Parties who have appeared in the action and good cause

3

appearing, the Court ORDERS the following:
Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this action and all

4
5

claims asserted in the above-captioned action by Plaintiff against the Defendant are DISMISSED

6

WITHOUT PREJDUCE. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. The Clerk of the Court

7

is directed to close the case.

8
9

IT IS SO ORDERED.

10
11

Dated:

June 5, 2024

12
13
14

Honorable Jon S. Tigar
United States District Court Judge

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

1

CASE NO. 4:23-cv-05675