Kaur v. USCIS et al
Filing
10
ORDER AS MODIFIED GRANTING 9 STIPULATION to Stay Proceeding. Status Report due by 8/16/2024. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 5/8/2024. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2024)
1 ISMAIL J. RAMSEY (CABN 189820)
United States Attorney
2 MICHELLE LO (NYRN 4325163)
Chief, Civil Division
3 ELIZABETH KURLAN (CABN 255869)
Assistant United States Attorney
4
450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055
San Francisco, California 94102-3495
5
Telephone: (415) 436-7298
Facsimile: (415) 436-6748
6
Elizabeth.Kurlan@usdoj.gov
7
Attorneys for Defendants
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
OAKLAND DIVISION
12
13
14
15
16
17
PRABHJOT KAUR,
Case No.: 4:24-cv-01183-HSG
Plaintiff,
STIPULATION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS;
ORDER AS MODIFIED
v.
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND
IMMIGRATION SERVICE (USCIS), et al.,
18
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
The parties, through their attorneys, hereby stipulate and respectfully request the Court to stay
proceedings in this case for a limited time, until January 15, 2025. The parties make this joint request
because they are pursuing an administrative resolution that may render further litigation of this case
unnecessary.
1.
Plaintiff filed this mandamus action seeking adjudication of his Form I-589, Application
for Asylum and Withholding of Removal. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
(“USCIS”) scheduled an interview for September 17, 2024. USCIS will work diligently towards
Stipulation to Stay Proceedings
Case No.: 4:24-cv-01183-HSG
1
1 completing adjudication of the I-589 application, absent the need for further adjudicative action or
2 unforeseen circumstances that would require additional time for adjudication.
2.
3
Plaintiff agrees to submit all supplemental documents and evidence to USCIS seven to
4 ten days prior to the agreed upon scheduled interview. Plaintiff recognizes that failure to submit these
5 documents seven to ten days prior to the interview may result in the interview being rescheduled at no
6 fault of USCIS.
3.
7
If needed by Plaintiff or their dependent(s), Plaintiff shall bring their own interpreter to
8 their asylum interview. See https://www.uscis.gov/newsroom/alerts/affirmative-asylum-applicants-must9 provide-interpreters-starting-sept-13. Plaintiff recognizes that failure to bring an interpreter to their
10 interview may result in the interview being rescheduled at no fault of USCIS.
4.
Upon receipt of the Asylum Office’s decision, Plaintiff agrees to voluntarily dismiss the
13
5.
The parties agree to bear their own litigation costs and attorney fees.
14
Accordingly, the parties stipulate and request that the proceedings in this case be stayed until
11
12 case.
15 January 15, 2025, at which time the parties will file a joint status report with the Court. At that time, the
16 parties may request a further continuance of the stay of proceedings, dismissal of the litigation if
17 appropriate, or placement of the case back on the Court’s active docket. A stay of proceedings in this
18 case will benefit the parties and conserve the Court’s resources while the parties pursue a potential
19 administrative resolution.
20
Respectfully submitted, 1
21
ISMAIL J. RAMSEY
United States Attorney
22
23 Dated: May 7, 2024
/s/ Elizabeth D. Kurlan
ELIZABETH D. KURLAN
Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendants
24
25
26
1
In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer of this document attests that all
27 signatories listed herein concur in the filing of this document.
28
Stipulation to Stay Proceedings
Case No.: 4:24-cv-01183-HSG
2
1 Dated: May 7, 2024
/s/ Robert B. Jobe
ROBERT B. JOBE
Attorney for Plaintiff
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ORDER AS MODIFIED
The Court orders proceedings in this case STAYED until August 16, 2024, at which time the
parties must file a joint status report with the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: May 8, 2024
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation to Stay Proceedings
Case No.: 4:24-cv-01183-HSG
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?