Villasana v. Dok Freight Systems, LLC et al
Filing
43
ORDER (as modified) GRANTING 41 STIPULATION for Leave to File First Amended Answers. **This order also TERMINATES docket no. 37 .** Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 9/26/2024. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2024)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Derek H. Lim (Bar No. 209496)
DEMLER, ARMSTRONG & ROWLAND, LLP
1990 N California Blvd., 8th Floor
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Telephone: (415) 949-1900
Facsimile: (415) 354-8380
Email:
lim@darlaw.com
Attorneys for Defendants DOK FREIGHT SYSTEMS,
LLC; MAMADOU B. SOW
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – OAKLAND DIVISION
10
11
12
ROCKO VILLASANA,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
17
18
Case No. 4:24-cv-01910
THE HONORABLE HAYWOOD S.
GILLIAM, JR.
v.
ORDER GRANTING
MAMMA DOU DAILO SOW; OLGUN
DEFENDANTS DOK FREIGHT
KURKAN; ANNA HAGEWOOD;
SYSTEMS, LLC AND
MAMADOU B. SOW LEAVE TO
GERRY McINTYRE; ADAM MONTY;
DOK FREIGHT SYSTEMS, LLC; and
FILE FIRST AMENDED
KZY LOGISTICS LLC and DOES 1 to 25, ANSWERS (as modified)
19
Defendants.
20
21
ORDER
22
23
Having reviewed the Stipulation to allow Defendants Dok Freight Systems,
24
LLC and Mamadou B. Sow leave to file a First Amended Answer, the Court finds
25
that leave to amend should be GRANTED. Counsel is directed to remove the word
26
///
27
///
28
1
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS DOK FREIGHT SYSTEMS, LLC AND MAMADOU
B. SOW LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED ANSWERS
1
“Proposed” in the title of the pleadings and e-file them on the docket forthwith.
2
The Court DISCHARGES the order to show cause, see Dkt. No. 39, and
3
TERMINATES Dkt. No. 37.
4
5
6
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION,
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
Date: 9/26/2024
______________________________
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS DOK FREIGHT SYSTEMS, LLC AND MAMADOU
B. SOW LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED ANSWERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?