Newman et al v. Weingarten et al
Filing
31
ORDER GRANTING (Case Nos. 29 in 4:24-cv-01934-HSG and 14 in 4:24-cv-02096-HSG) STIPULATION TO CONSOLIDATE AND STAY. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 6/5/2024. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2024)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
F ENW ICK & W ES T LLP
8
JAY L. POMERANTZ (CSB No. 209869)
jpomerantz@fenwick.com
FENWICK & WEST LLP
801 California Street
Mountain View, CA 94041
Telephone:
650.988.8500
Facsimile:
650.938.5200
Attorneys for Defendants
Tomer Weingarten, David Bernhardt,
Charlene T. Begley, Aaron Hughes, Mark S. Peek,
Ana G. Pinczuk, Daniel Scheinman, Teddie Wardi,
Jeffrey W. Yabuki, and Nominal Defendant
SentinelOne, Inc.
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
OAKLAND DIVISION
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
JOEL NEWMAN, derivatively on behalf of
SENTINELONE, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
TOMER WEINGARTEN, DAVID
BERNHARDT, CHARLENE T. BEGLEY,
AARON HUGHES, MARK S. PEEK, ANA
G. PINCZUK, DANIEL SCHEINMANN,
TEDDI WARDI, and JEFFREY W.
YABUKI,
Individual Defendants,
24
27
28
Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam Jr
Date Action Filed: March 29, 2024
SENTINELONE, INC.,
Nominal Defendant.
WALTER STOCHEVSKI, Derivatively on
Behalf of Nominal Defendant SENTINELONE,
INC.,
25
26
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONSOLIDATE AND STAY (as
modified)
-and-
22
23
Case No.: 4:24-cv-01934-HSG
Plaintiff,
v.
TOMER WEINGARTEN, DAVID
BERNHARDT, CHARLENE T. BEGLEY,
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONSOLIDATE AND STAY
Case No.: 4:24-cv-02096-HSG
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONSOLIDATE AND STAY (as
modified)
Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam Jr
Date Action Filed:
Case No.: 4:24-cv-01934-HSG
Case No.: 4:24-cv-02096-HSG
1
2
AARON HUGHES, MARK S. PEEK, ANA
PINCZUK, DANIEL SCHEINMAN, TEDDIE
WARDI, and JEFFREY W. YABUKI,
3
4
5
F ENW ICK & W ES T LLP
6
Defendants,
and
SENTINELONE, INC.,
Nominal Defendant.
7
Pursuant to Rule 42(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 42(a)”) and Civil
8
Local Rule 7-12, Plaintiffs Joel Newman and Walter Stochevski (together, “Plaintiffs”), Individual
9
Defendants Tomer Weingarten, David Bernhardt, Charlene T. Begley, Aaron Hughes, Mark S.
10
Peek, Ana Pinczuk, Daniel Scheinman, Teddie Wardi, and Jeffrey W. Yabuki (the “Individual
11
Defendants”), and Nominal Defendant SentinelOne, Inc. (“SentinelOne” or the “Nominal
12
Defendant” and, together with the Individual Defendants, the “Defendants,” and with the Plaintiffs,
13
the ”Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, stipulate as follows:
14
WHEREAS, on January 10, 2024, Plaintiff Walter Stochevski filed a stockholder derivative action
15
in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware on behalf of SentinelOne against the
16
Individual Defendants, captioned Stochevski v. Weingarten, et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-00025;
17
WHEREAS, on March 29, 2024, Plaintiff Joel Newman filed a Verified Stockholder
18
Derivative Complaint (the “Complaint”) on behalf of Nominal Defendant against the Individual
19
Defendants in the shareholder derivative action captioned Newman v. Weingarten, et al., Case No.
20
4:24-cv-01934-HSG (the “Newman” Action);
21
WHEREAS, on April 8, 2024, Stochevski v. Weingarten, et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-00025,
22
was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware to this Court, where it was
23
assigned the caption Stochevski v. Weingarten, et al., Case No. 4:24-cv-02096-HSG (the
24
“Stochevski Action” and, together with the Newman Action, the “Derivative Actions”);
25
WHEREAS, the Derivative Actions assert claims based on the same alleged events and
26
circumstances in the securities class action captioned In re SentinelOne, Inc. Securities Litigation,
27
Case No. 4:23-cv-02786-HSG (N.D. Cal.), pending before the United States District Court for the
28
Northern District of California (the “Securities Class Action”);
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONSOLIDATE AND STAY
2
Case No.: 4:24-cv-01934-HSG
Case No.: 4:24-cv-02096-HSG
1
2
3
F ENW ICK & W ES T LLP
4
WHEREAS, Individual Defendants Weingarten and Bernhardt are named as defendants in
both the Derivative Actions and the Securities Class Action;
WHEREAS, on May 3, 2024, this Court entered an order deeming the Derivative Actions
related to the Securities Class Action;
5
WHEREAS, Rule 42(a) provides that when actions involve “a common question of law or
6
fact,” the Court may “(1) join for hearing or trial any or all matters at issue in the actions; (2)
7
consolidate the actions; or (3) issue any other orders to avoid unnecessary cost or delay”;
8
WHEREAS, the Parties agree that the Derivative Actions should be consolidated for all
9
purposes, including pre-trial proceedings and trial, into a single consolidated action (hereinafter
10
referred to as the “Consolidated Derivative Action”), in order to avoid duplication of effort and
11
potentially conflicting results, and to conserve party and judicial resources; and
12
WHEREAS, in light of the similarities between the Derivative Actions and the Securities
13
Class Action, and because Plaintiffs seek damages on SentinelOne’s behalf arising from, among
14
other things, the outcome of the Securities Class Action, and in order to conserve the Parties’ and
15
judicial resources, the Parties to the Derivative Actions agree that all proceedings and deadlines in
16
the Derivative Actions, including discovery and Defendants’ obligation to move, answer, or
17
respond to the Complaints in the Derivative Actions, should be voluntarily stayed;
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
IT IS ACCORDINGLY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the Parties, pursuant to Civil
L.R. 7-12, through their respective undersigned counsel, as follows:
1. Defendants agree to accept service of process on behalf of any Defendant not yet
served in the Derivative Actions;
2. The Derivative Actions are hereby consolidated for all purposes, including pre-trial
proceedings and trial, into the Consolidated Derivative Action.
3. Every pleading in the Consolidated Derivative Action, or in any separate action
included herein, must bear the following caption:
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONSOLIDATE AND STAY
3
Case No.: 4:24-cv-01934-HSG
Case No.: 4:24-cv-02096-HSG
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
F ENW ICK & W ES T LLP
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
IN RE SENTINELONE, INC.
STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE
LITIGATION
Lead Case No. 4:24-cv-01934-HSG
(Consolidated with Case No. 4:24-cv-02096-HSG)
This Document Relates To:
ALL ACTIONS
4. The files of the Consolidated Derivative Action shall be maintained in one file under
Lead Case No. 4:24-cv-01934-HSG.
5. Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs in the Consolidated Derivative Action shall be:
LEVI & KORSINSKY, LLP
Daniel Tepper (pro hac vice forthcoming)
Correy A. Suk (pro hac vice forthcoming)
33 Whitehall Street, 17th Floor
New York, NY 10004
Telephone: (212) 363-7500
Email: gnespole@zlk.com
Email: csuk@zlk.com
RIGRODSKY LAW, P.A.
Timothy MacFall (pro hac vice forthcoming)
825 East Gate Boulevard, Suite 300Garden City, NY 11530
Telephone: (516) 683-3516
Email: tjm@rl-legal.com
20
6. Plaintiffs’ Co-Lead Counsel shall have the sole authority to speak for Plaintiffs in
21
all matters regarding pre-trial procedure, trial, and settlement negotiations and shall
22
make all work assignments in such manner as to facilitate the orderly and efficient
23
prosecution of this litigation and to avoid duplicative or unproductive effort.
24
Defendants’ counsel may rely upon all agreements made with Co-Lead Counsel, or
25
other duly authorized representative of Co-Lead Counsel, and such agreements shall
26
be binding on all plaintiffs in the Consolidated Derivative Action.
27
7. This Order shall apply to each purported derivative action arising out of the same or
28
substantially the same transactions or events as the Consolidated Derivative Action
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONSOLIDATE AND STAY
4
Case No.: 4:24-cv-01934-HSG
Case No.: 4:24-cv-02096-HSG
F ENW ICK & W ES T LLP
1
that is subsequently filed in, removed to, or transferred to this Court.
2
8. When a case which properly belongs as part of In re SentinelOne, Inc. Stockholder
3
Derivative Litigation, Lead Case No. 4:24-cv-01934-HSG, is hereafter filed in,
4
remanded to, or transferred to this Court, counsel for the Parties shall call such filing,
5
remand, or transfer to the attention of the Clerk of the Court for purposes of moving
6
the Court for an order consolidating such case(s) with In re SentinelOne, Inc.
7
Stockholder Derivative Litigation, Lead Case No. 4:24-cv-01934-HSG.
8
9. The Parties agree that a stay of the Consolidated Derivative Action pending
9
resolution of the Securities Class Action is appropriate in that it will avoid
10
inefficiencies and duplicative efforts, will better preserve the resources of the Court
11
and the Parties, and will more closely align the proceedings in the Consolidated
12
Derivative Action with the proceedings in the Securities Class Action.
13
10. All proceedings and deadlines in the Consolidated Derivative Action, including the
14
filing of pleadings, motion practice, and any discovery, shall be stayed and no
15
deadline shall be imposed until the earlier of (1) final resolution of the Securities
16
Class Action; or (2) an announcement that the parties in the Securities Class Action
17
have reached a settlement. Defendants shall not be required to move, or otherwise
18
respond, to the complaints in either the Newman Action or the Stochevski Action
19
during the pendency of the stay.
20
11. Within fourteen (14) days of resolution or dismissal of the Securities Class Action
21
with prejudice, the Parties shall meet and confer and submit to the Court a proposed
22
schedule for resuming proceedings in the Consolidated Derivative Action, including
23
dates by which Plaintiffs must file an amended complaint (if not already amended
24
pursuant to paragraph 14), if any, and a date by which Defendants must answer,
25
move against or otherwise respond to the operative complaint, and any associated
26
briefing schedules.
27
12. The Defendants shall promptly notify the Plaintiffs of any related derivative lawsuits
28
involving SentinelOne (“Related Derivative Action”). Defendants’ counsel shall
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONSOLIDATE AND STAY
5
Case No.: 4:24-cv-01934-HSG
Case No.: 4:24-cv-02096-HSG
F ENW ICK & W ES T LLP
1
promptly notify Co-Lead Counsel if any Related Derivative Action is not stayed for
2
the same or longer duration of time as the Consolidated Derivative Action.
3
13. In the event that a party-scheduled mediation or court-ordered settlement conference
4
is held in an effort to settle the Securities Class Action, counsel for Defendants shall
5
provide Co-Lead Counsel with reasonable advance notice of said mediation and
6
shall invite Plaintiffs to participate in such mediation (subject to Defendants seeking
7
permission from that court and/or other parties to the mediation and/or settlement
8
conference, as well as any insurers). In the event that Plaintiffs are not permitted to
9
attend such mediation and/or settlement conference, Defendants will make a good-
10
faith effort to mediate separately with Plaintiffs at or around the same time as the
11
mediation of the Securities Class Action. Defendants shall inform Plaintiffs
12
promptly upon the scheduling of any mediation with any other plaintiffs in a Related
13
Derivative Action and shall include Plaintiffs in any such mediation (subject to
14
Defendants seeking permission from that court and/or other parties to the mediation,
15
as well as any insurers).
16
14. Notwithstanding the agreed-upon stay of the Consolidated Derivative Action,
17
Plaintiffs may file a consolidated amended complaint during the pendency of the
18
stay, but Defendants shall have no obligation to move, answer, plead, or otherwise
19
respond to the complaint or any amended complaint during the pendency of the stay.
20
15. All proceedings in this action, including all applicable case management and ADR
21
deadlines, whether by Court order, the Federal Rules and Civil Local Rules, or
22
otherwise shall be temporarily stayed and/or vacated during the pendency of
23
Securities Class Action.
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONSOLIDATE AND STAY
6
Case No.: 4:24-cv-01934-HSG
Case No.: 4:24-cv-02096-HSG
1
2
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: June 4, 2024
3
FENWICK & WEST LLP
By: /s/ Jay L. Pomerantz
Jay L. Pomerantz
4
801 California Street
Mountain View, CA 94041
Telephone:
650.988.8500
Facsimile:
650.938.5200
5
6
7
Attorneys for Defendants
Tomer Weingarten, David Bernhardt,
Charlene T. Begley, Aaron Hughes, Mark S. Peek,
Ana G. Pinczuk, Daniel Scheinman, Teddie Wardi,
Jeffrey W. Yabuki, and nominal defendant
SentinelOne, Inc.
8
9
10
F ENW ICK & W ES T LLP
11
12
Dated: June 4, 2024
13
WOLF HALDENSTEIN ADLER FREEMAN &
HERZ LLP
By: /s/ Betsy C. Manifold
Betsy C. Manifold
14
15
750 B Street, Suite 1820
San Diego, CA 92101
Telephone: 619.239.4599
Facsimile: 619.234.4599
16
17
Local Counsel for Plaintiffs
18
Daniel Tepper (pro hac vice forthcoming)
Correy A. Suk (pro hac vice forthcoming)
LEVI & KORSINSKY, LLP
33 Whitehall Street, 17th Floor
New York, NY 10004
Telephone: (212) 363-7500
19
20
21
22
Timothy MacFall (pro hac vice forthcoming)
825 East Gate Boulevard, Suite 300
Garden City, NY 11530
Telephone: (516) 683-3516
23
24
Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONSOLIDATE AND STAY
7
Case No.: 4:24-cv-01934-HSG
Case No.: 4:24-cv-02096-HSG
1
Pursuant to Local Rule No. 5-1(i)(3), all signatories concur in filing this stipulation.
2
3
Dated: June 4, 2024
4
5
ORDER
6
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
9
By: /s/ Jay L. Pomerantz
Jay L. Pomerantz
The clerk is directed to administratively close the later-filed civil action, Case No. 24-cv-02096HSG. All future filings should be done in the lead case only.
10
F ENW ICK & W ES T LLP
11
DATED: 6/5/2024
12
THE HONORABLE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONSOLIDATE AND STAY
8
Case No.: 4:24-cv-01934-HSG
Case No.: 4:24-cv-02096-HSG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?