Clark v. Barrett Business Services, Inc.
Filing
23
ORDER (as modified) GRANTING #22 STIPULATION TO TRANSFER ACTION TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. ***Civil Case TERMINATED.*** Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 6/4/2024. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2024)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
HIEU T. WILLIAMS (SBN 280585)
hwilliams@hkemploymentlaw.com
HIRSCHFELD KRAEMER LLP
456 Montgomery Street, Suite 2200
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 835-9000
Facsimile: (415) 834-0443
BENJAMIN J. HEROLD (SBN 325391)
bherold@hkemploymentlaw.com
HIRSCHFELD KRAEMER LLP
233 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 600
Santa Monica, CA 90401
Telephone: (310) 255-0705
Facsimile: (310) 255-0986
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES, INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
S AN FRA NCI S CO
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
H IR SCHFELD K RAEM ER LLP
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
KYLE B. CLARK,
Plaintiff,
15
16
vs.
17
BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES, INC.;
and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,
18
Defendants.
19
20
25
26
JOINT STIPULATION TO TRANSFER
ACTION TO THE UNITED STATES
DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN
DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA AND
ORDER (as modified)
BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES, INC.,
Counterclaimant,
23
24
[Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.
24CV004837]
Complaint Filed: March 13, 2024
21
22
Case No. 4:24-cv-02390-HSG
[Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr.- Crtrm 2]
vs.
KYLE B. CLARK and ROES 1 to 10,
inclusive,
Counterdefendant.
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION TO TRANSFER ACTION
CASE NO. 4:24-CV-02390-HSG
4864-8791-8787
1
2
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff KYLE B. CLARK
3
(“Plaintiff”), Defendant BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES, INC (collectively, the
4
“Parties”) as follows:
5
in the Superior Court for the County of Sacramento in the matter captioned Clark v.
7
Barrett Business Services, Inc., et al., 24CV004837;
9
10
S AN FRA NCI S CO
11
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
WHEREAS, on March 13, 2024, Plaintiff filed suit against Defendant
6
8
H IR SCHFELD K RAEM ER LLP
1.
2.
WHEREAS, on April 22, 2024, Defendant removed the instant matter,
along with all compulsory counterclaims, to the United States District Court for the
Northern District of California;
3.
WHEREAS, venue for the instant matter is proper in district court of
12
the United States for the district and division within which the state court action
13
was pending, which is the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
14
California;
15
3.
WHEREAS, on May 28, 2024, the Hon. Judge Haywood S. Gilliam,
16
Jr. held a telephonic case management conference during which the parties agreed
17
to transfer the instant matter to the more appropriate venue – the Eastern District of
18
California;
19
20
21
4.
NOW THEREFORE, the Parties, by and through their respective
undersigned counsel, do stipulate as follows:
5.
The instant matter shall be transferred from the United States District
22
Court for the Northern District of California to the United States District Court for
23
the Eastern District of California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a).
24
6.
Further, Plaintiff shall be granted an extension of time to file a
25
responsive pleading to Defendant’s Counterclaim, the new deadline for which shall
26
be June 7, 2024.
27
[signature page follows]
28
2
JOINT STIPULATION TO TRANSFER ACTION
CASE NO. 4:24-CV-02390-HSG
1
2
3
4
SO STIPULATED.
Dated: June 3, 2024
HIRSCHFELD KRAEMER LLP
5
By:
6
Hieu T. Williams
Benjamin J. Herold
Attorneys for Defendant and
Counterclaimant
BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES,
INC.
7
8
9
10
Dated: June 3, 2024
BOHM LAW GROUP
12
S AN FRA NCI S CO
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
H IR SCHFELD K RAEM ER LLP
11
13
By:
14
15
Lawrance A. Bohm
Robert L. Boucher
Attorneys for Plaintiff
KYLE B. CLARK
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
JOINT STIPULATION TO TRANSFER ACTION
CASE NO. 4:24-CV-02390-HSG
ORDER
1
2
3
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that the instant
4
matter shall be transferred from the United States District Court for the Northern
5
District of California to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
6
California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Plaintiff must file a responsive
7
pleading to Defendant’s Counterclaim by June 7, 2024. The Clerk is directed to
8
close this case.
9
6/4/2024
Dated: _________________
10
12
S AN FRA NCI S CO
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
H IR SCHFELD K RAEM ER LLP
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. 4:24-CV-02390-HSG
By: __________________________
Hon. Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
Judge of the United States District
Court, Northern District of California
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?