Clark v. Barrett Business Services, Inc.

Filing 23

ORDER (as modified) GRANTING #22 STIPULATION TO TRANSFER ACTION TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. ***Civil Case TERMINATED.*** Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 6/4/2024. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2024)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

HIEU T. WILLIAMS (SBN 280585)
[e-mail]
HIRSCHFELD KRAEMER LLP
456 Montgomery Street, Suite 2200
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

BENJAMIN J. HEROLD (SBN 325391)
[e-mail]
HIRSCHFELD KRAEMER LLP
233 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 600
Santa Monica, CA 90401
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES, INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12
S AN FRA NCI S CO

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

H IR SCHFELD K RAEM ER LLP

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13
14

KYLE B. CLARK,

Plaintiff,

15
16

vs.

17

BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES, INC.;
and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,

18

Defendants.

19
20

25
26

JOINT STIPULATION TO TRANSFER
ACTION TO THE UNITED STATES
DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN
DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA AND
ORDER (as modified)

BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES, INC.,

Counterclaimant,

23
24

[Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.
24CV004837]

Complaint Filed: March 13, 2024

21
22

Case No. 4:24-cv-02390-HSG
[Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr.- Crtrm 2]

vs.
KYLE B. CLARK and ROES 1 to 10,
inclusive,
Counterdefendant.

27
28
JOINT STIPULATION TO TRANSFER ACTION
CASE NO. 4:24-CV-02390-HSG

4864-8791-8787

1
2

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff KYLE B. CLARK

3

(“Plaintiff”), Defendant BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES, INC (collectively, the

4

“Parties”) as follows:

5

in the Superior Court for the County of Sacramento in the matter captioned Clark v.

7

Barrett Business Services, Inc., et al., 24CV004837;

9
10

S AN FRA NCI S CO

11
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

WHEREAS, on March 13, 2024, Plaintiff filed suit against Defendant

6

8

H IR SCHFELD K RAEM ER LLP

1.

2.

WHEREAS, on April 22, 2024, Defendant removed the instant matter,

along with all compulsory counterclaims, to the United States District Court for the
Northern District of California;
3.

WHEREAS, venue for the instant matter is proper in district court of

12

the United States for the district and division within which the state court action

13

was pending, which is the United States District Court for the Eastern District of

14

California;

15

3.

WHEREAS, on May 28, 2024, the Hon. Judge Haywood S. Gilliam,

16

Jr. held a telephonic case management conference during which the parties agreed

17

to transfer the instant matter to the more appropriate venue – the Eastern District of

18

California;

19
20
21

4.

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties, by and through their respective

undersigned counsel, do stipulate as follows:
5.

The instant matter shall be transferred from the United States District

22

Court for the Northern District of California to the United States District Court for

23

the Eastern District of California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a).

24

6.

Further, Plaintiff shall be granted an extension of time to file a

25

responsive pleading to Defendant’s Counterclaim, the new deadline for which shall

26

be June 7, 2024.

27

[signature page follows]

28
2
JOINT STIPULATION TO TRANSFER ACTION
CASE NO. 4:24-CV-02390-HSG

1
2
3
4

SO STIPULATED.
Dated: June 3, 2024

HIRSCHFELD KRAEMER LLP

5

By:

6

Hieu T. Williams
Benjamin J. Herold
Attorneys for Defendant and
Counterclaimant
BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES,
INC.

7
8
9
10

Dated: June 3, 2024

BOHM LAW GROUP

12
S AN FRA NCI S CO

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

H IR SCHFELD K RAEM ER LLP

11

13

By:

14
15

Lawrance A. Bohm
Robert L. Boucher

Attorneys for Plaintiff
KYLE B. CLARK

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
JOINT STIPULATION TO TRANSFER ACTION
CASE NO. 4:24-CV-02390-HSG

ORDER

1
2
3

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that the instant

4

matter shall be transferred from the United States District Court for the Northern

5

District of California to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of

6

California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Plaintiff must file a responsive

7

pleading to Defendant’s Counterclaim by June 7, 2024. The Clerk is directed to

8

close this case.

9

6/4/2024
Dated: _________________

10

12
S AN FRA NCI S CO

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

H IR SCHFELD K RAEM ER LLP

11

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. 4:24-CV-02390-HSG

By: __________________________
Hon. Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
Judge of the United States District
Court, Northern District of California