Clark v. Barrett Business Services, Inc.

Filing 23

ORDER (as modified) GRANTING 22 STIPULATION TO TRANSFER ACTION TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. ***Civil Case TERMINATED.*** Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 6/4/2024. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2024)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 HIEU T. WILLIAMS (SBN 280585) hwilliams@hkemploymentlaw.com HIRSCHFELD KRAEMER LLP 456 Montgomery Street, Suite 2200 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 835-9000 Facsimile: (415) 834-0443 BENJAMIN J. HEROLD (SBN 325391) bherold@hkemploymentlaw.com HIRSCHFELD KRAEMER LLP 233 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 600 Santa Monica, CA 90401 Telephone: (310) 255-0705 Facsimile: (310) 255-0986 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 S AN FRA NCI S CO ATTO RNEY S AT LAW H IR SCHFELD K RAEM ER LLP 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 KYLE B. CLARK, Plaintiff, 15 16 vs. 17 BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES, INC.; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 18 Defendants. 19 20 25 26 JOINT STIPULATION TO TRANSFER ACTION TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA AND ORDER (as modified) BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES, INC., Counterclaimant, 23 24 [Sacramento County Superior Court Case No. 24CV004837] Complaint Filed: March 13, 2024 21 22 Case No. 4:24-cv-02390-HSG [Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr.- Crtrm 2] vs. KYLE B. CLARK and ROES 1 to 10, inclusive, Counterdefendant. 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION TO TRANSFER ACTION CASE NO. 4:24-CV-02390-HSG 4864-8791-8787 1 2 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff KYLE B. CLARK 3 (“Plaintiff”), Defendant BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES, INC (collectively, the 4 “Parties”) as follows: 5 in the Superior Court for the County of Sacramento in the matter captioned Clark v. 7 Barrett Business Services, Inc., et al., 24CV004837; 9 10 S AN FRA NCI S CO 11 ATTO RNEY S AT LAW WHEREAS, on March 13, 2024, Plaintiff filed suit against Defendant 6 8 H IR SCHFELD K RAEM ER LLP 1. 2. WHEREAS, on April 22, 2024, Defendant removed the instant matter, along with all compulsory counterclaims, to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; 3. WHEREAS, venue for the instant matter is proper in district court of 12 the United States for the district and division within which the state court action 13 was pending, which is the United States District Court for the Eastern District of 14 California; 15 3. WHEREAS, on May 28, 2024, the Hon. Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, 16 Jr. held a telephonic case management conference during which the parties agreed 17 to transfer the instant matter to the more appropriate venue – the Eastern District of 18 California; 19 20 21 4. NOW THEREFORE, the Parties, by and through their respective undersigned counsel, do stipulate as follows: 5. The instant matter shall be transferred from the United States District 22 Court for the Northern District of California to the United States District Court for 23 the Eastern District of California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). 24 6. Further, Plaintiff shall be granted an extension of time to file a 25 responsive pleading to Defendant’s Counterclaim, the new deadline for which shall 26 be June 7, 2024. 27 [signature page follows] 28 2 JOINT STIPULATION TO TRANSFER ACTION CASE NO. 4:24-CV-02390-HSG 1 2 3 4 SO STIPULATED. Dated: June 3, 2024 HIRSCHFELD KRAEMER LLP 5 By: 6 Hieu T. Williams Benjamin J. Herold Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES, INC. 7 8 9 10 Dated: June 3, 2024 BOHM LAW GROUP 12 S AN FRA NCI S CO ATTO RNEY S AT LAW H IR SCHFELD K RAEM ER LLP 11 13 By: 14 15 Lawrance A. Bohm Robert L. Boucher Attorneys for Plaintiff KYLE B. CLARK 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 JOINT STIPULATION TO TRANSFER ACTION CASE NO. 4:24-CV-02390-HSG ORDER 1 2 3 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that the instant 4 matter shall be transferred from the United States District Court for the Northern 5 District of California to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of 6 California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Plaintiff must file a responsive 7 pleading to Defendant’s Counterclaim by June 7, 2024. The Clerk is directed to 8 close this case. 9 6/4/2024 Dated: _________________ 10 12 S AN FRA NCI S CO ATTO RNEY S AT LAW H IR SCHFELD K RAEM ER LLP 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. 4:24-CV-02390-HSG By: __________________________ Hon. Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Judge of the United States District Court, Northern District of California

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?