Napa Valley Limoncello LLC et al v. Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Company

Filing 33

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING 32 Stipulation TO EXTEND EXPERT REPORT DEADLINES ONLY. Opening Reports due by 4/30/2025. Rebuttal Reports due by 5/28/2025. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2025)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 SONIA MARTIN (SBN 191148) sonia.martin@dentons.com MORDECAI BOONE (SBN 196811) mordecai.boone@dentons.com EMILY NOZICK (SBN 201050) emily.nozick@dentons.com THOMAS D’ANTONIO (SBN 316472) thomas.dantonio@dentons.com DENTONS US LLP 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 1210 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: 415 882 5000 Facsimile: 415 882 0300 Attorneys for Defendant NATIONWIDE AGRIBUSINESS INSURANCE COMPANY DENTONS US LLP 1999 HARRISON STREET, SUITE 1210 OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94612 415 882 5000 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 NAPA VALLEY LIMONCELLO LLC, d/b/a NAPA VALLEY DISTILLERY, a California limited liability company; NAPASTAK, INC., d/b/a NAPASTAK CELLARS, a California corporation, Case No. 4:24-cv-3243- HSG RESUBMITTED STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND EXPERT REPORT DEADLINES ONLY Plaintiffs, v. NATIONWIDE AGRIBUSINESS INSURANCE CO., an Iowa corporation, and DOES 1-10, 22 Defendants. 23 24 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b)(4), Local Rules 143 and 144, and the Honorable 25 Haywood S Gilliam, Jr., plaintiffs Napa Valley Limoncello LLC, d/b/a Napa Valley Distillery; Napastak, 26 Inc., d/b/a Napastak Cellars and defendant Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Co., by and through their 27 respective counsels of record, stipulate and agree as follows and respectfully request entry of an order giving 28 effect to their stipulation: CASE NO. 4:24-cv-3243- HSG US_ACTIVE\129468529\V-2 RESUBMITTED STIP. & O. TO EXTEND EXPERT REPORT DEADLINES ONLY 1 WHEREAS, the parties have been engaging in extensive discovery including, but not limited to: 2 requests for production of documents, requests for admission, interrogatories, negotiating and stipulating to 3 a protective order, supplemental document productions, meeting and conferring to work through multiple 4 discovery disputes without involving the court, and propounding numerous third party subpoenas; 5 6 WHEREAS, the parties have taken two depositions and need to conduct three more prior to the disclosure of expert reports; 7 8 WHEREAS, the parties, through no fault of their own, have experienced delays in the production of third party testing documents necessary to conduct the remaining depositions; 9 DENTONS US LLP 1999 HARRISON STREET, SUITE 1210 OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94612 415 882 5000 10 WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 144(b), the Court has granted one prior request to modify the deadlines in this case (Dkt. 25); 11 WHEREAS, the current case schedule is as follows: 12 13 Event Current Deadline Exchange of opening expert reports March 28, 2025 Exchange of rebuttal expert reports May 5, 2025 Close of fact and expert discovery June 27, 2025 Dispositive pre-trial motion hearing deadline August 15, 2025 Pretrial conference: November 4, 2025 Trial November 17, 2025 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 WHEREAS, a continuance of the expert report exchange deadlines is necessary to provide the parties adequate time to complete the depositions necessary as bases for expert reports; 26 WHEREAS, the parties seek to extend the expert exchange report deadlines only; 27 WHEREAS, this will not affect any other dates in the schedule; 28 WHEREAS, the parties agree to move the two dates below as follows: CASE NO. 4:24-cv-3243- HSG US_ACTIVE\129468529\V-2 RESUBMITTED STIP. & O. TO EXTEND EXPERT REPORT DEADLINES ONLY 1 Event Current Deadline Proposed Deadline Exchange of opening expert reports March 28, 2025 April 30, 2025 Exchange of rebuttal expert reports March 5, 2025 May 28, 2025 2 3 4 5 DENTONS US LLP 1999 HARRISON STREET, SUITE 1210 OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94612 415 882 5000 6 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AND STIPULATED that: 7 Good cause exists to continue the expert disclosure deadlines in this matter, set forth in the Court’s 8 Order granting the parties’ stipulated request to modify the case schedule (Dkt. 25) as set forth in the table 9 above. 10 conference at which time new dates may be selected. Alternatively, the parties respectfully request that the Court set a further case management 11 The parties respectfully request the Court adopt the foregoing stipulated as the order of the Court. 12 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 13 14 Dated: March 10, 2025 DENTONS US LLP 15 By: /s/ Mordecai Boone Mordecai Boone 16 17 Attorneys for Defendant NATIONWIDE AGRIBUSINESS INSURANCE COMPANY 18 19 20 Dated: March 10, 2025 21 BRIGGS & ALEXANDER, APLC Jeffrey Weber, Esq. 22 By: /s/ Jeffrey Weber Jeffrey Weber 23 24 Attorneys for Plaintiffs NAPA VALLEY LIMONCELLO LLC, d/b/a NAPA VALLEY DISTILLERY; NAPASTAK, INC., d/b/a NAPASTAK CELLARS 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. 4:24-cv-3243- HSG US_ACTIVE\129468529\V-2 RESUBMITTED STIP. & O. TO EXTEND EXPERT REPORT DEADLINES ONLY ORDER 1 2 Pursuant to the above-stipulation, and for good cause shown, the Court hereby continues 3 the expert report deadlines set forth in the Court’s Order granting the parties’ stipulated request to 4 modify the case schedule (Dkt. 25) and the new case schedule is as follows: 5 6 7 Event Deadline Exchange of opening expert reports April 30, 2025 Exchange of rebuttal expert reports May 28, 2025 Close of fact and expert discovery June 27, 2025 Dispositive pre-trial motion hearing deadline August 15, 2025 Pretrial conference: November 4, 2025 Trial November 17, 2025 8 9 DENTONS US LLP 1999 HARRISON STREET, SUITE 1210 OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94612 415 882 5000 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 3/11/2025 By: ________________________________ The Honorable Haywood S Gilliam, Jr United States District Judge CASE NO. 4:24-cv-3243- HSG RESUBMITTED STIP. & O. TO EXTEND EXPERT REPORT DEADLINES ONLY 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 US_ACTIVE\129468529\V-2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?