Napa Valley Limoncello LLC et al v. Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Company
Filing
33
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING 32 Stipulation TO EXTEND EXPERT REPORT DEADLINES ONLY. Opening Reports due by 4/30/2025. Rebuttal Reports due by 5/28/2025. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2025)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
SONIA MARTIN (SBN 191148)
sonia.martin@dentons.com
MORDECAI BOONE (SBN 196811)
mordecai.boone@dentons.com
EMILY NOZICK (SBN 201050)
emily.nozick@dentons.com
THOMAS D’ANTONIO (SBN 316472)
thomas.dantonio@dentons.com
DENTONS US LLP
1999 Harrison Street, Suite 1210
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: 415 882 5000
Facsimile: 415 882 0300
Attorneys for Defendant
NATIONWIDE AGRIBUSINESS
INSURANCE COMPANY
DENTONS US LLP
1999 HARRISON STREET, SUITE 1210
OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94612
415 882 5000
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
NAPA VALLEY LIMONCELLO LLC, d/b/a
NAPA VALLEY DISTILLERY, a California
limited liability company; NAPASTAK, INC.,
d/b/a NAPASTAK CELLARS, a California
corporation,
Case No. 4:24-cv-3243- HSG
RESUBMITTED STIPULATION AND
ORDER TO EXTEND EXPERT
REPORT DEADLINES ONLY
Plaintiffs,
v.
NATIONWIDE AGRIBUSINESS
INSURANCE CO., an Iowa corporation, and
DOES 1-10,
22
Defendants.
23
24
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b)(4), Local Rules 143 and 144, and the Honorable
25
Haywood S Gilliam, Jr., plaintiffs Napa Valley Limoncello LLC, d/b/a Napa Valley Distillery; Napastak,
26
Inc., d/b/a Napastak Cellars and defendant Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Co., by and through their
27
respective counsels of record, stipulate and agree as follows and respectfully request entry of an order giving
28
effect to their stipulation:
CASE NO. 4:24-cv-3243- HSG
US_ACTIVE\129468529\V-2
RESUBMITTED STIP. & O.
TO EXTEND EXPERT REPORT DEADLINES ONLY
1
WHEREAS, the parties have been engaging in extensive discovery including, but not limited to:
2
requests for production of documents, requests for admission, interrogatories, negotiating and stipulating to
3
a protective order, supplemental document productions, meeting and conferring to work through multiple
4
discovery disputes without involving the court, and propounding numerous third party subpoenas;
5
6
WHEREAS, the parties have taken two depositions and need to conduct three more prior to the
disclosure of expert reports;
7
8
WHEREAS, the parties, through no fault of their own, have experienced delays in the production
of third party testing documents necessary to conduct the remaining depositions;
9
DENTONS US LLP
1999 HARRISON STREET, SUITE 1210
OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94612
415 882 5000
10
WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 144(b), the Court has granted one prior request to modify the
deadlines in this case (Dkt. 25);
11
WHEREAS, the current case schedule is as follows:
12
13
Event
Current Deadline
Exchange of opening expert reports
March 28, 2025
Exchange of rebuttal expert reports
May 5, 2025
Close of fact and expert discovery
June 27, 2025
Dispositive pre-trial motion hearing deadline
August 15, 2025
Pretrial conference:
November 4, 2025
Trial
November 17, 2025
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
WHEREAS, a continuance of the expert report exchange deadlines is necessary to provide the
parties adequate time to complete the depositions necessary as bases for expert reports;
26
WHEREAS, the parties seek to extend the expert exchange report deadlines only;
27
WHEREAS, this will not affect any other dates in the schedule;
28
WHEREAS, the parties agree to move the two dates below as follows:
CASE NO. 4:24-cv-3243- HSG
US_ACTIVE\129468529\V-2
RESUBMITTED STIP. & O.
TO EXTEND EXPERT REPORT DEADLINES ONLY
1
Event
Current Deadline
Proposed Deadline
Exchange of opening expert
reports
March 28, 2025
April 30, 2025
Exchange of rebuttal expert
reports
March 5, 2025
May 28, 2025
2
3
4
5
DENTONS US LLP
1999 HARRISON STREET, SUITE 1210
OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94612
415 882 5000
6
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AND STIPULATED that:
7
Good cause exists to continue the expert disclosure deadlines in this matter, set forth in the Court’s
8
Order granting the parties’ stipulated request to modify the case schedule (Dkt. 25) as set forth in the table
9
above.
10
conference at which time new dates may be selected.
Alternatively, the parties respectfully request that the Court set a further case management
11
The parties respectfully request the Court adopt the foregoing stipulated as the order of the Court.
12
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
13
14
Dated: March 10, 2025
DENTONS US LLP
15
By: /s/ Mordecai Boone
Mordecai Boone
16
17
Attorneys for Defendant
NATIONWIDE AGRIBUSINESS INSURANCE
COMPANY
18
19
20
Dated: March 10, 2025
21
BRIGGS & ALEXANDER, APLC
Jeffrey Weber, Esq.
22
By: /s/ Jeffrey Weber
Jeffrey Weber
23
24
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
NAPA VALLEY LIMONCELLO LLC, d/b/a
NAPA VALLEY DISTILLERY; NAPASTAK,
INC., d/b/a NAPASTAK CELLARS
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. 4:24-cv-3243- HSG
US_ACTIVE\129468529\V-2
RESUBMITTED STIP. & O.
TO EXTEND EXPERT REPORT DEADLINES ONLY
ORDER
1
2
Pursuant to the above-stipulation, and for good cause shown, the Court hereby continues
3
the expert report deadlines set forth in the Court’s Order granting the parties’ stipulated request to
4
modify the case schedule (Dkt. 25) and the new case schedule is as follows:
5
6
7
Event
Deadline
Exchange of opening expert reports
April 30, 2025
Exchange of rebuttal expert reports
May 28, 2025
Close of fact and expert discovery
June 27, 2025
Dispositive pre-trial motion hearing
deadline
August 15, 2025
Pretrial conference:
November 4, 2025
Trial
November 17, 2025
8
9
DENTONS US LLP
1999 HARRISON STREET, SUITE 1210
OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94612
415 882 5000
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 3/11/2025
By: ________________________________
The Honorable Haywood S Gilliam, Jr
United States District Judge
CASE NO. 4:24-cv-3243- HSG
RESUBMITTED STIP. & O.
TO EXTEND EXPERT REPORT DEADLINES ONLY
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
US_ACTIVE\129468529\V-2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?