Langenderfer v. Miller et al
Filing
31
ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE AND SETTING NEW BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 1/29/2025. Set/Reset Deadlines as to: Responses due by 3/3/2025 Replies due by 3/17/2025(ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2025)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
THOMAS LANGENDERFER,
Plaintiff,
8
United States District Court
Northern District of California
9
v.
10
ROGER A. MILLER, et al.,
11
Defendants.
Case No. 24-cv-06526-HSG
ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE AND
SETTING NEW BRIEFING
SCHEDULE
12
13
Pro se Plaintiff Geronimo Thomas Langenderfer initially filed this case in September 2024.
14
Dkt. No. 1. Defendants Thomas J. Madden and Roger A. Miller filed a motion to dismiss on
15
November 26, 2024, arguing that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this case. Dkt.
16
No. 13. Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion was due by December 10, but he never filed a
17
response. The Court then issued an order to show cause why the motion should not be granted and
18
the case dismissed based on Plaintiff’s failure to respond. See Dkt. No. 23. Again, Plaintiff did
19
not file a response by the court-imposed deadline. Since then, however, the filings that the Court
20
mailed to Plaintiff have been returned as undeliverable. See, e.g., Dkt. Nos. 24–26, 27–29. It has
21
come to the Court’s attention that Plaintiff had the wrong address on file, and he has since filed a
22
notice of change of address. See Dkt. No. 30.
23
24
The Court therefore DISCHARGES the ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, Dkt. No. 23, and
DIRECTS the Clerk to re-send the following documents to Plaintiff’s new mailing address:
25
26
•
Clerk’s Notice of Impending Reassignment. Dkt. No. 16.
27
•
Order Reassigning Case. Dkt. No. 17.
28
•
Clerk’s Notice Setting a Case Management Conference. Dkt. No. 18.
1
•
Corrected Clerk’s Notice Setting a Case Management Conference. Dkt. No. 19.
2
•
Clerk’s Notice Vacating Case Management Conference. Dkt. No. 22.
3
•
Order to Show Cause. Dkt. No. 23.
4
Defendants are similarly DIRECTED to re-serve the motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. 13, and
5
6
all supporting documents, Dkt. Nos. 14–15, on Plaintiff at his updated address by January 31,
7
2025. The Court RESETS the briefing schedule on the motion to dismiss as follows:
8
9
•
Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion to dismiss is due by March 3, 2025.
10
•
Defendants’ reply is due by March 17, 2025.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
Once the briefing is complete, the motion to dismiss will be deemed submitted and no hearing will
13
be held, unless otherwise ordered by the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15
16
17
Dated:
1/29/2025
______________________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?