Candid Ventures, LLC v. Dew Ventures, Inc. et al
Filing
52
ORDER (as modified) GRANTING 51 STIPULATION Re 48 Order. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 1/29/2025. **Docket No. 47 is TERMINATED as moot.** (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2025)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Ethan J. Brown (SBN 218814)
ethan@bnsklaw.com
Sara C. Colón (SBN 281514)
sara@bnsklaw.com
BROWN, NERI, SMITH & KHAN LLP
11601 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 2080
Los Angeles, California 90025
Telephone: (310) 593-9890
Facsimile: (310) 593-9980
Attorneys for Defendants Dew Ventures Inc.,
Suresh Deopura and Specially Appearing Defendant,
Feathers Up India Pvt. Ltd.
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
CANDID VENTURES LLC, an Ohio limited
liability company [f/k/a ANUPRIYA, LLC],
Case No. 4:24-cv-07800-HSG
15
JOINT STIPULATION
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Plaintiffs,
v.
DEW VENTURES, INC., a California
corporation; SURESH DEOPURA; an
individual; FEATHERSUP INDIA PVT. LTD; an
entity of unknown form; and DOES 1 – 100,
inclusive,
Defendants.
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TRO AND APPEAR VIRTUALLY AT THE JANUARY 30, 2025, HEARING ON
MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
1
The Parties, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby jointly stipulate to allow counsel
2
for all parties to appear telephonically or by other virtual means at the hearing currently scheduled for
3
January 30, 2025;
4
5
6
The Parties also stipulate to extend the Temporary Restraining Order entered by this Court in this
matter to December 31, 2025.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
7
8
DATE: January 22, 2025
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF:
9
10
By:
11
12
13
14
/s/Joseph B. Womick (per email authority)
Joseph B. Womick (0097743)
Candid Ventures LLC
10290 Alliance Road
Blue Ash, OH 45242
Joe.Womick@VoraVentures.com
T: (513) 577-7473
Attorneys for Plaintiff CANDID VENTURES, LLC,
an Ohio limited Liability company [f/k/a AnuPriya,
LLC
15
16
17
18
DATE: January 22, 2025
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS:
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
By:______________________________
Ethan J. Brown (SBN 218814)
ethan@bnsklaw.com
Sara C. Colón (SBN 281514)
sara@bnsklaw.com
BROWN, NERI, SMITH & KHAN LLP
11601 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 2080
Los Angeles, California 90025
Telephone: (310) 593-9890
Facsimile: (310) 593-9980
Attorneys Defendants Dew Ventures Inc.,
Suresh Deopura and Specially Appearing Defendant,
Feathers Up India Pvt. Ltd.
28
JOINT STIPULATION TO APPEAR VIRTUALLY AT THE JANUARY 30, 2025, HEARING ON MOTION FOR
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Ethan J. Brown (SBN 218814)
ethan@bnsklaw.com
Sara C. Colón (SBN 281514)
sara@bnsklaw.com
BROWN, NERI, SMITH & KHAN LLP
11601 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 2080
Los Angeles, California 90025
Telephone: (310) 593-9890
Facsimile: (310) 593-9980
Attorneys for Defendants Dew Ventures Inc.,
Suresh Deopura and Specially Appearing Defendant,
Feathers Up India Pvt. Ltd.
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
CANDID VENTURES LLC, an Ohio limited
liability company [f/k/a ANUPRIYA, LLC],
Case No. 4:24-cv-07800-HSG
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
ORDER (as modified)
Plaintiffs,
v.
DEW VENTURES, INC., a California
corporation; SURESH DEOPURA; an
individual; FEATHERSUP INDIA PVT. LTD; an
entity of unknown form; and DOES 1 – 100,
inclusive,
Defendants.
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER
1
ORDER
2
After full consideration of Specially Appearing Defendant Feathers Up India PVT LTD,
3
Defendant Dew Ventures, Inc. and Defendant Suresh Deopura’s Motion to Allow Virtual Appearance at
4
January 30, 2025, hearing on Motion for Preliminary Injunction, and the Joint Stipulation regarding the
5
same, the Court finds that good cause exists and hereby orders that:
6
1. The hearing previously scheduled for January 30, 2025 is vacated.
7
2. The TRO already in effect in this matter is hereby extended to December 31, 2025.
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
11
DATE: 1/29/2025
________________________________________
DISTRICT JUDGE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?