Mitcham v. Calderon, et al

Filing 392

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 391 Motion for Extension of Time to File.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2012)

Download PDF
Case5:97-cv-03825-LHK Document391-2 Filed12/27/12 Page1 of 2 1 2 3 KAREN S. SCHRYVER, SB #124939 P.O. BOX 486 Gualala, CA 95445 Telephone: (707) 884-4502 Fax: (707) 884-4951 schryver@wildblue.net 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NEOMA D. KENWOOD, SB #101805 P.M.B. #414 1563 Solano Avenue Berkeley, California 94707 Telephone: (510) 528-4775 nkenwood@sbcglobal.net MICHAEL G. MILLMAN, SB #45639 CALIFORNIA APPELLATE PROJECT 101 Second Street #600 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 495-0500 Fax: (415) 495-5616 MMillman@capsf.org Attorneys for Petitioner STEPHEN LOUIS MITCHAM 13 14 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 SAN JOSE DIVISION 18 19 STEPHEN LOUIS MITCHAM, 20 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner, 21 22 KEVIN CHAPPELLE, Warden of California State Prison at San Quentin, 23 Respondent. Case No. C-97-3825 LHK [PROPOSED] ORDER CAPITAL CASE 24 25 Having considered the fifth unopposed motion of Petitioner to Modify the Filing 26 Dates regarding his Surreply for Claim D and good cause appearing therefore, 27 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER: PET’S 5th UNOPPOSED MOT. TO MODIFY FILING DATES RE: SURREPLY Case No. C-97-03825-LHK -1- Case5:97-cv-03825-LHK Document391-2 Filed12/27/12 Page2 of 2 1 2 3 4 1. That Petitioner shall file a Surreply to Claim D (IAC subclaim) in his Amended Petition not later than March 8, 2013, (60 days after January 7, 2013). 2. That Respondent shall file a Response not later than 30 days from the date of filing of Petitioner’s Surreply. 5 6 DATED: December 28, 2012 7 8 9 HON. LUCY H. KOH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER: PET’S 5th UNOPPOSED MOT. TO MODIFY FILING DATES RE: SURREPLY Case No. C-97-03825-LHK -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?