USA, et al v. Alisal Water Corp, et al

Filing 890

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE 886 DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. Opposition due 5/25/2009, reply due 6/1/2009. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 5/11/09. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2009) Modified on 6/3/2009 (gm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 **E-Filed 5/11/09** IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ALISAL WATER CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. Case Number C 97-20099 JF (HRL) ORDER1 SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION [re: document no. 887] On May 9, 2009, Defendants filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court's order issued on March 27, 2009 [docket no. 880], as modified by the order issued April 23, 2009 [docket no. 885]. Any opposition to the motion shall be filed on or before May 25, 2009. Any reply shall be filed on or before June 1, 2009. The matter thereafter will be taken under This disposition is not designated for publication in the official reports. C a s e No. C 97-20099 JF (HRL) O R D E R SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION ( JF L C 2 ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 submission without oral argument unless the parties are notified otherwise by the Court.2 DATED: 5/11/09 __________________________________ JEREMY FOGEL United States District Judge Defendants' motion arguably violates Civil Local Rule 7-9(a), requiring leave of court before filing a motion for reconsideration. However, application of Rule 7-9(a) is unclear given that judgment has been entered in this case. Even assuming that Rule 7-9(a) does apply, the Court in the exercise of its discretion grants leave to seek reconsideration. 2 C a s e No. C 97-20099 JF (HRL) O R D E R SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION ( JF L C 2 ) 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 This Order was served on the following persons: County of Monterey perrym@co.monterey.ca.us dnemecek@manatt.com, mchavez@manatt.com David Patrick Nemecek , Jr Diana Donabedian Frank G. Tiesen J. Michael Hogan Joe Alfred Izen , Jr ddonabedian@luce.com tiesenf@co.monterey.ca.us, ontiveross@co.monterey.ca.us hoganm@co.monterey.ca.us joeizen@joeizen.com, joeslowgo@hotmail.com jms01@i.frys.com Jonathan Mark Schwartz Kevin T. Haroff kharoff@ssd.com, sdavid@ssd.com lweiss@steefel.com, ycano@steefel.com Lenard Garsen Weiss Lori Jonas lori.jonas@usdoj.gov Mfairman@pacbell.net Marc Peter Fairman Mary Grace Perry perrym@co.monterey.ca.us, andradar@co.monterey.ca.us, coatsir@co.monterey.ca.us Paul Daniel Gullion pauldgullion@aol.com, ndgullion@aol.com Vargalaw@mbay.net, Vargalaw@SBCGlobal.net 16 Stephen Gary Varga 17 Steven O'Rourke 18 Vanessa W. Vallarta 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 C a s e No. C 97-20099 JF (HRL) O R D E R SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION ( JF L C 2 ) Steve.ORourke@usdoj.gov vanessav@ci.salinas.ca.us, julian@ci.salinas.ca.us

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?