Asyst Technologies v. Empak Corporation, et al

Filing 1146

ORDER GRANTING 1145 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE HEARING DATE ON ASYST TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'S MOTION FOR REVIEW OF THE CLERK'S TAXATION OF COSTS. Motion Hearing set for 10/17/2008 09:00 AM.Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 9/11/08. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2008)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
FENWICK & WEST LLP
A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O

DARRYL M. WOO (CSB No. 100513) E-Mail: [e-mail] MICHAEL J. SACKSTEDER (CSB No.191605) E-Mail: [e-mail] DAVID D. SCHUMANN (CSB No. 223936) E-Mail: [e-mail] FENWICK & WEST LLP 555 California Street, 12th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] JOSEPH S. BELICHICK (CSB No. 229371) E-Mail: [e-mail] FENWICK & WEST LLP Silicon Valley Center, 801 California Street Mountain View, CA 94041 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff­Appellant Asyst Technologies, Inc.

**E-Filed 9/11/08**

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ASYST TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, Case No. 98-20451 JF

EMPAK, INC.,; EMTRAK, INC.; JENOPTIK AG; JENOPTIK INFAB, INC.; and MEISSNER + WURST GmbH, Defendants.

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE HEARING DATE ON ASYST TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'S MOTION FOR REVIEW OF THE CLERK'S TAXATION OF COSTS --------------------AND [PROPOSED]-ORDER
Date: Time: Courtroom: Judge: September 26, 2008 9:00 a.m. 3 Hon. Jeremy Fogel

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.

STIP TO CONTINUE HEARING ON ASYST'S MOTION FOR REVIEW OF COSTS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO. 98-20451 JF

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
FENWICK & WEST LLP
A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that the hearing on Asyst Technologies, Inc.'s Motion for Review of the Clerk's Taxation of Costs now set for September 26, 2008 at 9:00 a.m. be continued on the Court's calendar to October 17, 2008 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 3, before the Honorable Jeremy Fogel. The letter briefs regarding the effect of the Court's 2004 Order on costs previously due 14 days prior to the September 26th hearing will be due October 3rd, 14 days prior to the new October 17, 2008 hearing date. The Court previously continued this hearing because the Federal Circuit had not yet rendered an opinion in the pending appeal which potentially impacts the Court's decision on costs. Good cause exists for this continuation because the Federal Circuit has yet to render the expected opinion. DATED: September 10, 2008 FENWICK & WEST LLP By: /s/ David D. Schumann David D. Schumann Attorneys for Plaintiff ASYST TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIP TO CONTINUE HEARING ON ASYST'S MOTION FOR REVIEW OF COSTS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 2

By:

/s/ Daniel T. Shvodian Daniel T. Shvodian HOWREY LLP 1950 University Avenue, 4th Floor East Palo Alto, CA 94303 Email: [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendants JENOPTIK AG, JENOPTIK INFAB, INC., and EMTRAK, INC.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _________________, 2008 September 11

___________________________________ The Honorable Jeremy Fogel United States District Judge

CASE NO. 98-20451 JF

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
FENWICK & WEST LLP
A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 I, David Schumann, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Daniel T. Shvodian, counsel for Jenoptik, et al. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 10th day of September, 2008 in San Francisco, California. /s/ David D. Schumann David D. Schumann

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIP TO CONTINUE HEARING ON ASYST'S MOTION FOR REVIEW OF COSTS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 3 CASE NO. 98-20451 JF