Asyst Technologies v. Empak Corporation, et al

Filing 1148

ORDER APPROVING 1147 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE HEARING DATE ON ASYST TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'S MOTION FOR REVIEW OF THE CLERK'S TAXATION OF COSTS. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 10/3/08. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/3/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 FENWICK & WEST LLP A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O DARRYL M. WOO (CSB No. 100513) E-Mail: dwoo@fenwick.com MICHAEL J. SACKSTEDER (CSB No.191605) E-Mail: msacksteder@fenwick.com DAVID D. SCHUMANN (CSB No. 223936) E-Mail: dschumann@fenwick.com FENWICK & WEST LLP 555 California Street, 12th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 875-2300 Facsimile: (415) 281-1350 JOSEPH S. BELICHICK (CSB No. 229371) E-Mail: jbelichick@fenwick.com FENWICK & WEST LLP Silicon Valley Center, 801 California Street Mountain View, CA 94041 Telephone: (650) 988-8500 Facsimile: (650) 938-5200 Attorneys for Plaintiff­Appellant Asyst Technologies, Inc. **E-Filed 10/3/08** 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ASYST TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, Case No. 98-20451 JF EMPAK, INC.,; EMTRAK, INC.; JENOPTIK AG; JENOPTIK INFAB, INC.; and MEISSNER + WURST GmbH, Defendants. STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE HEARING DATE ON ASYST TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'S MOTION FOR REVIEW OF THE CLERK'S TAXATION OF COSTS --------------------AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Date: Time: Courtroom: Judge: October 17, 2008 9:00 a.m. 3 Hon. Jeremy Fogel AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. STIP TO CONTINUE HEARING ON ASYST'S MOTION FOR REVIEW OF COSTS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 98-20451 JF 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 FENWICK & WEST LLP A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that the hearing on Asyst Technologies, Inc.'s Motion for Review of the Clerk's Taxation of Costs now set for October 17, 2008 at 9:00 a.m. be continued on the Court's calendar to November 14, 2008 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 3, before the Honorable Jeremy Fogel. The letter briefs regarding the effect of the Court's 2004 Order on costs previously due 14 days prior to the October 17 hearing will be due October 31, 2008, 14 days prior to the new November 14, 2008 hearing date. The Court previously continued this hearing because the Federal Circuit had not yet rendered an opinion in the pending appeal which potentially impacts the Court's decision on costs. Good cause exists for this continuation because the Federal Circuit has yet to render the expected opinion. DATED: October 1, 2008 FENWICK & WEST LLP By: /s/ David D. Schumann David D. Schumann Attorneys for Plaintiff ASYST TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP TO CONTINUE HEARING ON ASYST'S MOTION FOR REVIEW OF COSTS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 By: /s/ Daniel T. Shvodian Daniel T. Shvodian HOWREY LLP 1950 University Avenue, 4th Floor East Palo Alto, CA 94303 Email: ShvodianD@howrey.com Attorneys for Defendants JENOPTIK AG, JENOPTIK INFAB, INC., and EMTRAK, INC. IT IS SO ORDERED. 10/3/08 Dated: _________________, 2008 ___________________________________ The Honorable Jeremy Fogel United States District Judge CASE NO. 98-20451 JF 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 FENWICK & WEST LLP A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 I, David Schumann, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Daniel T. Shvodian, counsel for Jenoptik, et al. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 1st day of October, 2008 in San Francisco, California. /s/ David D. Schumann David D. Schumann 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP TO CONTINUE HEARING ON ASYST'S MOTION FOR REVIEW OF COSTS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 CASE NO. 98-20451 JF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?