Aronson, et al v. McKesson HBOC, Inc., et al

Filing 1800

ORDER 1795 Awarding Attorneys' Fees and Expenses. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 2/8/13. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 In re McKESSON HBOC, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION CLASS ACTION 13 14 15 Master File No. 99-CV-20743 RMW (PVT) And Related Cases This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. 16 17 [] ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES 18 This matter came on for hearing on February 8, 2013 (the “Settlement Hearing”) on Lead 19 Counsel’s motion for an award of attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of expenses in connection 20 with the Settlement of Contingent Payment Claim with Arthur Andersen LLP. The Court having 21 considered all matters submitted to it at the Settlement Hearing and otherwise; and it appearing 22 that the Notice of the Settlement Hearing substantially in the form approved by the Court was 23 published on the website maintained for the case, as well as Lead Counsel’s firm websites, and 24 [] ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES Master File No: 99-CV-20743 RMW (PVT) 25 1 the Summary Notice of the Settlement Hearing substantially in the form approved by the Court 2 was transmitted over the PR Newswire pursuant to the specifications of the Court and was mailed 3 to all McKesson Class Members who had submitted valid Claim Forms in the action and who 4 had cashed their most recent distribution checks; and the Court having considered and 5 determined the fairness and reasonableness of the award of attorneys’ fees and expenses 6 requested. 7 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 8 1. This Order incorporates by reference the definitions in the Agreement Between 9 Lead Plaintiff and Arthur Andersen LLP Concerning Contingent Payment Claim, dated 10 November 6, 2012 (the “Agreement”) and the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement between 11 Lead Plaintiff and Andersen dated December 19, 2006 (the “McKesson Stipulation of 12 Settlement”) and all terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the same meanings as set forth 13 in the Agreement or the McKesson Stipulation of Settlement. 14 2. The Court has jurisdiction to enter this Order and over the subject matter of the 15 Litigation and all parties to the Litigation, including all members of the McKesson Class (the 16 “Class”). 17 3. Notice of Lead Counsel’s application for attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of 18 expenses was posted on www.mckessonhbocsettlement.com and Lead Counsel’s websites, 19 www.blbglaw.com and www.barrack.com; transmitted over the PR Newswire; and mailed to all 20 McKesson Class Members who had submitted valid Claim Forms in the action and who had 21 cashed their most recent prior distribution and, thus, are currently eligible to receive additional 22 distributions. The form and method of notifying the Class of the application for attorneys’ fees 23 and expenses satisfied the requirements of Rule 23(h) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 24 [] ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES Master File No: 99-CV-20743 RMW (PVT) 25 -2- 1 due process, and all other applicable law and rules, and constituted due and sufficient notice to 2 all persons and entities entitled thereto. 3 4. Lead Counsel is hereby awarded attorneys’ fees in the amount of $____________, 4 which sum the Court finds to be fair and reasonable, and $_____________ in reimbursement of 5 expenses, which fees and expenses shall be paid to Lead Counsel from the McKesson Settlement 6 Amount. 7 5. 8 9 10 11 In making this award of attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of expenses to be paid from the McKesson Settlement Amount, the Court has considered and found that: (a) The $9.5 million cash Settlement will provide a substantial benefit to members of the Class; (b) The fee sought by Lead Counsel has been reviewed and approved as fair 12 and reasonable by the Court-appointed Lead Plaintiff, a sophisticated institutional investor that 13 was substantially involved in all aspects of the Litigation; 14 (c) Copies of the Summary Notice were mailed to all McKesson Class 15 Members who had submitted valid Claim Forms in the action and who had cashed their most 16 recent prior distribution stating that Lead Counsel would apply for attorneys’ fees in an amount 17 of $134,930 and reimbursement of expenses in an amount not to exceed $40,000, and there are 18 no objections to the requested award of attorneys’ fees or expenses; 19 20 21 22 (d) Lead Counsel has conducted the Litigation and achieved the Settlement with skill, perseverance and diligent advocacy; and (e) The amount of attorneys’ fees awarded and expenses to be reimbursed from the McKesson Settlement Amount are fair and reasonable. 23 24 25 [] ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES Master File No: 99-CV-20743 RMW (PVT) -3- 6. 1 Any appeal or any challenge affecting this Court’s approval regarding any 2 attorneys’ fees and expense application shall in no way disturb or affect the finality of the 3 Judgment. 7. 4 Exclusive jurisdiction is hereby retained over the parties and the McKesson Class 5 Members for all matters relating to this Litigation, including the administration, interpretation, 6 effectuation or enforcement of the Agreement and this Order. 8. 7 In the event that the Settlement is terminated or the Effective Date of the 8 Settlement otherwise fails to occur, this Order shall be rendered null and void to the extent 9 provided by the Agreement. 9. 10 11 There is no just reason for delay in the entry of this Order, and immediate entry by the Clerk of the Court is expressly directed. 12 13 Dated: ______________, 2013 14 ______________________________ RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 [] ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES Master File No: 99-CV-20743 RMW (PVT) -4-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?