Aronson, et al v. McKesson HBOC, Inc., et al
Filing
1800
ORDER 1795 Awarding Attorneys' Fees and Expenses. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 2/8/13. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
In re McKESSON HBOC, INC.
SECURITIES LITIGATION
CLASS ACTION
13
14
15
Master File No. 99-CV-20743 RMW (PVT)
And Related Cases
This Document Relates To:
ALL ACTIONS.
16
17
[] ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES
18
This matter came on for hearing on February 8, 2013 (the “Settlement Hearing”) on Lead
19
Counsel’s motion for an award of attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of expenses in connection
20
with the Settlement of Contingent Payment Claim with Arthur Andersen LLP. The Court having
21
considered all matters submitted to it at the Settlement Hearing and otherwise; and it appearing
22
that the Notice of the Settlement Hearing substantially in the form approved by the Court was
23
published on the website maintained for the case, as well as Lead Counsel’s firm websites, and
24
[] ORDER AWARDING
ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES
Master File No: 99-CV-20743 RMW (PVT)
25
1
the Summary Notice of the Settlement Hearing substantially in the form approved by the Court
2
was transmitted over the PR Newswire pursuant to the specifications of the Court and was mailed
3
to all McKesson Class Members who had submitted valid Claim Forms in the action and who
4
had cashed their most recent distribution checks; and the Court having considered and
5
determined the fairness and reasonableness of the award of attorneys’ fees and expenses
6
requested.
7
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
8
1.
This Order incorporates by reference the definitions in the Agreement Between
9
Lead Plaintiff and Arthur Andersen LLP Concerning Contingent Payment Claim, dated
10
November 6, 2012 (the “Agreement”) and the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement between
11
Lead Plaintiff and Andersen dated December 19, 2006 (the “McKesson Stipulation of
12
Settlement”) and all terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the same meanings as set forth
13
in the Agreement or the McKesson Stipulation of Settlement.
14
2.
The Court has jurisdiction to enter this Order and over the subject matter of the
15
Litigation and all parties to the Litigation, including all members of the McKesson Class (the
16
“Class”).
17
3.
Notice of Lead Counsel’s application for attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of
18
expenses was posted on www.mckessonhbocsettlement.com and Lead Counsel’s websites,
19
www.blbglaw.com and www.barrack.com; transmitted over the PR Newswire; and mailed to all
20
McKesson Class Members who had submitted valid Claim Forms in the action and who had
21
cashed their most recent prior distribution and, thus, are currently eligible to receive additional
22
distributions. The form and method of notifying the Class of the application for attorneys’ fees
23
and expenses satisfied the requirements of Rule 23(h) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
24
[] ORDER AWARDING
ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES
Master File No: 99-CV-20743 RMW (PVT)
25
-2-
1
due process, and all other applicable law and rules, and constituted due and sufficient notice to
2
all persons and entities entitled thereto.
3
4.
Lead Counsel is hereby awarded attorneys’ fees in the amount of $____________,
4
which sum the Court finds to be fair and reasonable, and $_____________ in reimbursement of
5
expenses, which fees and expenses shall be paid to Lead Counsel from the McKesson Settlement
6
Amount.
7
5.
8
9
10
11
In making this award of attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of expenses to be paid
from the McKesson Settlement Amount, the Court has considered and found that:
(a)
The $9.5 million cash Settlement will provide a substantial benefit to
members of the Class;
(b)
The fee sought by Lead Counsel has been reviewed and approved as fair
12
and reasonable by the Court-appointed Lead Plaintiff, a sophisticated institutional investor that
13
was substantially involved in all aspects of the Litigation;
14
(c)
Copies of the Summary Notice were mailed to all McKesson Class
15
Members who had submitted valid Claim Forms in the action and who had cashed their most
16
recent prior distribution stating that Lead Counsel would apply for attorneys’ fees in an amount
17
of $134,930 and reimbursement of expenses in an amount not to exceed $40,000, and there are
18
no objections to the requested award of attorneys’ fees or expenses;
19
20
21
22
(d)
Lead Counsel has conducted the Litigation and achieved the Settlement
with skill, perseverance and diligent advocacy; and
(e)
The amount of attorneys’ fees awarded and expenses to be reimbursed
from the McKesson Settlement Amount are fair and reasonable.
23
24
25
[] ORDER AWARDING
ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES
Master File No: 99-CV-20743 RMW (PVT)
-3-
6.
1
Any appeal or any challenge affecting this Court’s approval regarding any
2
attorneys’ fees and expense application shall in no way disturb or affect the finality of the
3
Judgment.
7.
4
Exclusive jurisdiction is hereby retained over the parties and the McKesson Class
5
Members for all matters relating to this Litigation, including the administration, interpretation,
6
effectuation or enforcement of the Agreement and this Order.
8.
7
In the event that the Settlement is terminated or the Effective Date of the
8
Settlement otherwise fails to occur, this Order shall be rendered null and void to the extent
9
provided by the Agreement.
9.
10
11
There is no just reason for delay in the entry of this Order, and immediate entry
by the Clerk of the Court is expressly directed.
12
13
Dated:
______________, 2013
14
______________________________
RONALD M. WHYTE
United States District Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
[] ORDER AWARDING
ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES
Master File No: 99-CV-20743 RMW (PVT)
-4-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?