Shields v. Lamarque
Filing
88
ORDER REQUESTING COPIES OF BRIEFS AND EXHIBITS RE: PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. Signed by Judge James Ware on July 27, 2010. (jwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2010)
Shields v. Lamarque
Doc. 88
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Raymond Arthur Shields, v. Petitioner, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION NO. C 00-20868 JW ORDER REQUESTING COPIES OF BRIEFS AND EXHIBITS RE: PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
United United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
A. A. Lamarque, Respondent. /
Presently before the Court is Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (hereafter, "Petition," Docket Item No. 1.) Upon review, the Court finds that it is not in possession of filed copies of the Petition, any exhibits to the Petition, and the Response. (See Docket Item Nos. 1, 32.) The Court finds that it cannot proceed to the merits of the Petition until such documents have been received. Accordingly, on or before August 30, 2010, the California State Attorney General's Office shall lodge with the Court (1) the Petition and any supporting Memorandum, (2) all exhibits to the Petition and Memorandum, and (3) the Response.
Dated: July 27, 2010
JAMES WARE United States District Judge
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO: Erik G. Babcock erik@babcocklawoffice.com Gerald August Engler Gerald.Engler@doj.ca.gov Morris Beatus morris.beatus@doj.ca.gov Nanette Sue Winaker nanette.winaker@doj.ca.gov Peggy S. Ruffra peggy.ruffra@doj.ca.gov
Dated: July 27, 2010
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: /s/ JW Chambers Elizabeth Garcia Courtroom Deputy
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?