Hyundai Electronics, et al v. Rambus, Inc.

Filing 3952

STIPULATION AND ORDER 3950 Regarding Schedule for Briefing and Hearing With Regard to Rambus's Bill of Costs: Motion Hearing set for 6/5/2009 02:00 PM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 5/8/09. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Parties listed on signature page

*E-FILED - 5/8/09*

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, vs. RAMBUS INC., Defendant.

CASE NO. CV 00-20905 RMW STIPULATION AND [] ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULE FOR BRIEFING AND HEARING WITH REGARD TO RAMBUS'S BILL OF COSTS Date: Time: Judge: Ctrm: June 5, 2009 2:00 p.m. Honorable Ronald M. Whyte 6

-1-

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER RE: BRIEFING AND HEARING ON RAMBUS'S BILL OF COSTS, CASE NO. CV 00-20905 RMW

1 2 3 4

WHEREAS, Rambus filed its bill of costs on April 9, 2009; WHEREAS, Hynix filed its objections to the bill of costs on April 30, 2009; WHEREAS, Local Rule 54-5 permits the claiming party to file a motion for review of the taxation of costs after the filing of objections and taxation by the Clerk;

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 (3) Oral argument on the bill of costs shall be heard, if the Court wishes to hear 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2STIPULATION AND [] ORDER RE: BRIEFING AND HEARING ON RAMBUS'S BILL OF COSTS, CASE NO. CV 00-20905 RMW

WHEREAS, the Court indicated that it, rather than the Clerk, will tax costs in this case; WHEREAS, counsel for Rambus and Hynix conferred on April 29, 2009, pursuant to Local Rule 54-2, regarding Hynix's objections and wish to continue to meet and confer, NOW, THEREFORE, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE COURT, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among the undersigned counsel for Hynix and Rambus, that: (1) Hynix and Rambus shall have through and including May 14, 2009, to file a statement identifying any cost items or objections that have been withdrawn based upon their meet and confer efforts, and also to identify the cost items that remain in dispute; (2) Rambus shall have through and including May 14, 2009, to file papers in response to Hynix's objections to the bill of costs; and

oral argument, on June 5, 2009, at 2:00 p.m.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

DATED: May 7, 2009

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP By: /s/ Andrew Song Counsel for Rambus Inc.

DATED: May 7, 2009

TOWNSEND & TOWNSEND & CREW LLP By: /s/ Julie Han Counsel for Hynix Semiconductor Inc.; Hynix Semiconductor America Inc.; Hynix Semiconductor U.K. Ltd.; and Hynix Semiconductor Deutschland GmbH

ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: May 8, 2009

Honorable Ronald M. Whyte United States District Court Judge

-3-

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER RE: BRIEFING AND HEARING ON RAMBUS'S BILL OF COSTS, CASE NO. CV 00-20905 RMW