Hyundai Electronics, et al v. Rambus, Inc.

Filing 4042

STIPULATION AND ORDER 4041 Regarding Schedule for Briefing With Regard to Hynix's Bill of Costs. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 6/23/11. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2011)

1

Parties listed on signature page

2
*E-FILED - 6/23/11*

3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11
12

HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,

13
14

vs.

15

CASE NO. CV 00-20905 RMW
STIPULATION AND []
ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULE FOR
BRIEFING WITH REGARD TO HYNIX’S
BILL OF COSTS

RAMBUS INC.,

16
17

Defendant.
Judge:
Ctrm:

Honorable Ronald M. Whyte
6

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1-

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER RE:
BRIEFING ON HYNIX’S BILL OF COSTS
CASE NO. CV 00-20905 RMW

1
2

WHEREAS, Hynix filed its Bill of Costs Pursuant to Fed. Rules App. Proc., Rule
39(e) on May 27, 2011;

3

WHEREAS, Rambus Inc. (“Rambus”) filed a Motion to Extend Time for

4

Objections to Hynix’s Bill of Costs and for the Court to Hear the Bill of Costs in the First

5

Instance (Local Rule 6-3), on June 2, 2011;

6

NOW, THEREFORE, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE COURT, IT IS

7

HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among the undersigned counsel for Hynix and

8

Rambus, that:

9
10
11

(1)

The Court, rather than the Clerk, will consider Hynix’s Bill of Costs and

Supplemental Bill of Costs and Rambus’s Objections in the first instance;
(2)

Hynix has through and including fifteen (15) days after the mandate issues

12

from the Federal Circuit to submit a Supplemental Bill of Costs Pursuant to Fed. Rules App.

13

Proc., Rule 39(e);

14

(3)

In the event Hynix files a Supplemental Bill of Costs pursuant to paragraph

15

(2), Rambus has through and including thirty-seven (37) days after the mandate issues to submit

16

Rambus’s Objections to Hynix’s Bill of Costs and any Supplemental Bill of Costs;

17

(4)

In the event Hynix does not file a Supplemental Bill of Costs after the

18

mandate issues pursuant to paragraph (2), Rambus has through and including thirty (30) days

19

after the mandate issues to file its Objections;

20

(5)

Hynix and Rambus have through and including fifteen (15) days after

21

Rambus files its Objections to file a statement identifying any cost items or objections that have

22

been withdrawn based upon their meet and confer efforts, and also to identify the cost items that

23

remain in dispute;

24

(6)

25
26

Hynix has through and including fifteen (15) days after Rambus files its

Objections to file papers in response to Rambus’s Objections to the Bill of Costs;
(7)

Oral argument on the Bill of Costs, Supplemental Bill of Costs, and

27

Rambus’s Objections shall be heard, if the Court wishes to hear oral argument, at a time that is

28

convenient for the Court after Hynix files its response to Rambus’s Objections;
-2-

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER RE:
BRIEFING ON HYNIX’S BILL OF COSTS
CASE NO. CV 00-20905 RMW

1

(8)

The schedule set forth above is subject to modification by Court order, either

2

upon request from either party or on the Court’s own initiative, or by agreement of the parties

3

subject to Court approval.

4
5

DATED: June 10, 2011

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
By: /s/ Fred A. Rowley, Jr.
Fred A. Rowley, Jr.

6
7
8
9

Counsel for Rambus Inc.
DATED: June 10, 2011

TOWNSEND & TOWNSEND & CREW LLP

10
By: /s/ Ted Brown

11

Ted Brown

12

Counsel for Hynix Semiconductor Inc.; Hynix
Semiconductor America Inc.; Hynix Semiconductor
U.K. Ltd.; and Hynix Semiconductor Deutschland
GmbH

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.

21
22

23
DATED: June ___, 2011

23
24
Honorable Ronald M. Whyte
United States District Court Judge

25
26
27
28
-3-

STIPULATION AND [ ORDER RE:
BRIEFING ON HYNIX’S BILL OF COSTS
CASE NO. CV 00-20905 RMW