Hyundai Electronics, et al v. Rambus, Inc.
Filing
4060
STIPULATION AND ORDER 4053 Extending Schedule for Briefing with Regard to Hynix's Bill of Costs. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 9/29/2011. (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2011)
1
Parties listed on signature page
2
3
*E-FILED - 9/29/11*
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., et al.,
13
Plaintiffs,
14
vs.
15
CASE NO. CV 00-20905 RMW
STIPULATION AND []
ORDER EXTENDING SCHEDULE FOR
BRIEFING WITH REGARD TO HYNIX’S
BILL OF COSTS
RAMBUS INC.,
16
17
Defendant.
Judge:
Ctrm:
Honorable Ronald M. Whyte
6
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1-
STIPULATION AND [] ORDER RE:
EXTENDING BRIEFING ON BILL OF COSTS
CASE NO. CV 00-20905 RMW
Case5:00-cv-20905-RMW Document4053
1
2
WHEREAS, Hynix filed its Bill of Costs Pursuant to Fed. Rules App. Proc., Rule
39(e) on May 27, 2011;
3
4
WHEREAS, the Court entered a Stipulation and Order Regarding Schedule for
Briefing with Regard to Hynix’s Bill of Costs on June 23, 2011 (“June 23 Order”);
5
6
Filed09/14/11 Page2 of 4
WHEREAS, the mandate of the Federal Circuit issued in this case on August 9,
2011;
7
WHEREAS, Hynix filed a Supplemental Bill of Costs on August 24, 2011;
8
WHEREAS, Rambus’s Objections to Hynix’s Bill of Costs and Supplemental Bill
9
of Costs is currently due on September 15, 2011 pursuant to the briefing schedule set forth in the
10
June 23 Order;
11
WHEREAS, on August 18, 2011 and September 7, 2011, Hynix provided Rambus
12
with certain additional documents related to certain items in its Bill of Costs, including foreign-
13
language documents;
14
WHEREAS, Hynix has agreed to provide Rambus with English-language
15
translations of the foreign-language documents provided on September 7, 2011 as soon as they
16
become available;
17
18
NOW, THEREFORE, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE COURT, IT IS
19
HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among the undersigned counsel for Hynix and
20
Rambus, that:
21
22
23
24
25
(1)
Rambus has through and including September 19, 2011 to file its Objections
to Hynix’s Bill of Costs and Supplemental Bill of Costs;
(2)
Hynix has through and including October 3, 2011 to file papers in response
to Rambus’s Objections;
(3)
Hynix and Rambus have through and including October 3, 2011 to file a
26
statement identifying any cost items or objections that have been withdrawn based upon their
27
meet and confer efforts, and also to identify the cost items that remain in dispute;
28
-2-
STIPULATION AND [] ORDER RE:
EXTENDING BRIEFING ON S BILL OF COSTS
CASE NO. CV 00-20905 RMW
Case5:00-cv-20905-RMW Document4053
1
(4)
Filed09/14/11 Page3 of 4
The schedule set forth above is subject to modification by Court order, either
2
upon motion from either party demonstrating good cause or on the Court’s own initiative, or by
3
agreement of the parties subject to Court approval.
4
DATED: September 14, 2011
5
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
By:
/s/ Fred A. Rowley, Jr.
Fred A. Rowley, Jr.
6
Counsel for Rambus Inc.
7
FRED A. ROWLEY, JR. (SBN 192298)
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
355 South Grand Avenue, 35th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560
Telephone
(213) 683-9100
Facsimile:
(213) 687-3702
Email: Fred.Rowley@mto.com
8
9
10
11
12
DATED: September 14, 2011
13
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
By:
/s/ Theodore G. Brown, III
Theodore G. Brown, III
14
Counsel for Hynix Semiconductor Inc.; Hynix
Semiconductor America Inc.; Hynix Semiconductor
U.K. Ltd.; and Hynix Semiconductor Deutschland
GmbH
15
16
17
Theodore G. Brown, III (SBN 114672)
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
1080 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone
(650) 326-2400
Facsimile:
(650) 326-2422
Email: tbrown@kilpatricktownsend.com
18
19
20
21
22
23
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
DATED: September ___, 2011
Honorable Ronald M. Whyte
United States District Court Judge
26
27
28
-3-
STIPULATION AND [] ORDER RE:
EXTENDING BRIEFING ON S BILL OF COSTS
CASE NO. CV 00-20905 RMW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?