Hyundai Electronics, et al v. Rambus, Inc.
Filing
4120
STIPULATION AND ORDER 4116 Regarding Discharge of Supersedeas Bond Posted by Hynix Semiconductor Inc.. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 2/24/12. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2012)
1
Parties listed on signature page
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
13
14
vs.
15
RAMBUS INC.,
16
17
Defendant.
CASE NO. CV 00-20905 RMW
STIPULATION AND []
ORDER REGARDING DISCHARGE OF
SUPERSEDEAS BOND POSTED BY
HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC.
Judge:
Ctrm:
Honorable Ronald M. Whyte
6
18
19
20
21
WHEREAS, the Court entered Final Judgment against Hynix Semiconductor Inc., Hynix
22
Semiconductor America Inc., Hynix Semiconductor U.K. Ltd., and Hynix Semiconductor
23
Deutschland GmbH (collectively “Hynix”) on March 10, 2009;
24
25
26
WHEREAS, Hynix filed its Notice of Appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit from the Final Judgment on April 6, 2009;
WHEREAS, on May 14, 2009, the Court Ordered that execution of the Final Judgment be
27
stayed pending the appeal in this action, on condition that, inter alia, Hynix post a supersedeas
28
bond in the amount of $250 million within 45 days of its May 14, 2009 Order;
-1-
STIPULATION AND [] ORDER
REGARDING DISCHARGE OF BOND
CASE NO. CV 00-20905 RMW
1
WHEREAS, on June 26, 2009, Hynix posted a supersedeas bond, Bond No. CGB
2
8960181 issued by Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and Zurich American Insurance
3
Company, in the amount to $250 million in accordance with the Court’s Order of May 14, 2009;
4
WHEREAS, on September 17, 2010, the Court ordered that Hynix post a supersedeas
5
bond in the full amount of the Final Judgment within 30 days in order to maintain the stay of
6
execution;
7
WHEREAS, on October 18, 2010, Hynix posted a supersedeas bond, in the form of a
8
Rider to Bond No. CGB 8960181, issued by Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and
9
Zurich American Insurance Company, in the full amount of the Final Judgment, together with
10
post-judgment interest through October 18, 2010 in accordance with the Court’s Order of
11
September 17, 2010 (hereinafter, Bond No. CGB 8960181 and the Rider to Bond No. CGB
12
8960181 are collectively referred to as “the bond”) ;
13
14
15
16
17
WHEREAS, on May 13, 2011, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated the
Final Judgment against Hynix and remanded for further proceedings;
WHEREAS, on January 11, 2012, the Court ordered that Hynix’s obligation to maintain a
supersedeas bond in respect of the judgment of March 10, 2009, was released;
WHEREAS, Hynix and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and Zurich American
18
Insurance Company have requested that Rambus Inc. (“Rambus”) enter into this stipulation
19
clarifying certain aspects of the scope of this Court’s January 11, 2012 Order;
20
21
WHEREAS, Rambus understands that the import of paragraph (2) on page 13 of the
Court’s Order of January 11, 2012, is that the bond is released and exonerated; and
22
WHEREAS, Hynix and Rambus each acknowledges and agrees that Rambus’s and
23
Hynix’s agreement to this stipulation is without waiver of any and all rights that either Rambus or
24
Hynix may have with regard to the judgment of March 10, 2009, and the subsequent remand
25
proceedings, including Hynix’s and/or Rambus’s rights, if any, to appeal or otherwise challenge
26
the Court’s Order of January 11, 2012, save and except for Rambus’s right to seek
27
reconsideration of or appeal from the release and exoneration of the bond,
28
-2-
STIPULATION AND [
OF BOND
CASE NO. CV 00-20905 RMW
1
NOW, THEREFORE, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE COURT, IT IS
2
HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among the undersigned counsel for Hynix and
3
Rambus, that the below Order may be entered by the Court.
4
DATED: February 8, 2012
5
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
By: /s/ Gregory P. Stone
Gregory P. Stone
6
7
Counsel for Rambus Inc.
8
9
DATED: February 8, 2012
10
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON, LLP
By: /s/ Theodore G. Brown, III
Theodore G. Brown, III
11
12
Counsel for Hynix Semiconductor Inc.; Hynix
Semiconductor America Inc.; Hynix Semiconductor
U.K. Ltd.; and Hynix Semiconductor Deutschland
GmbH
13
14
15
16
ORDER
17
In furtherance of the Court's Order of January 11, 2012, and for the reasons set forth
18
19
therein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
(1)
The Supersedeas Bond posted in this case, Fidelity and Deposit Company of
20
Maryland and Zurich American Insurance Company Bond No. CGB 8960181, and the Rider
21
thereto, are hereby unconditionally released and exonerated and Fidelity and Deposit Company of
22
Maryland and Zurich American Insurance Company are hereby released from all liability under
23
the terms of the Supersedeas Bond and the Rider;
24
(2)
The clerk is directed to release the original bond(s) to counsel for Hynix; and
25
(3)
Any and all rights that Rambus and/or Hynix may have with regard to the
26
judgment of March 10, 2009, and the subsequent remand proceedings, including Rambus’s and/or
27
Hynix’s rights, if any, to appeal or otherwise challenge the Court’s Order of January 11, 2012, are
28
-3-
STIPULATION AND [] ORDER
REGARDING DISCHARGE OF BOND
CASE NO. CV 00-20905 RMW
1
preserved and are not waived, save and except for Rambus’s right to seek reconsideration of or
2
appeal from the release and exoneration of the Supersedeas Bond and Rider referred to above.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
DATED: February ___, 2012
6
7
Honorable Ronald M. Whyte
United States District Court Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
63969953 v1
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-
STIPULATION AND [] ORDER
REGARDING DISCHARGE OF BOND
CASE NO. CV 00-20905 RMW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?