Hyundai Electronics, et al v. Rambus, Inc.

Filing 4120

STIPULATION AND ORDER 4116 Regarding Discharge of Supersedeas Bond Posted by Hynix Semiconductor Inc.. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 2/24/12. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2012)

Download PDF
1 Parties listed on signature page 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, 13 14 vs. 15 RAMBUS INC., 16 17 Defendant. CASE NO. CV 00-20905 RMW STIPULATION AND [] ORDER REGARDING DISCHARGE OF SUPERSEDEAS BOND POSTED BY HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC. Judge: Ctrm: Honorable Ronald M. Whyte 6 18 19 20 21 WHEREAS, the Court entered Final Judgment against Hynix Semiconductor Inc., Hynix 22 Semiconductor America Inc., Hynix Semiconductor U.K. Ltd., and Hynix Semiconductor 23 Deutschland GmbH (collectively “Hynix”) on March 10, 2009; 24 25 26 WHEREAS, Hynix filed its Notice of Appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit from the Final Judgment on April 6, 2009; WHEREAS, on May 14, 2009, the Court Ordered that execution of the Final Judgment be 27 stayed pending the appeal in this action, on condition that, inter alia, Hynix post a supersedeas 28 bond in the amount of $250 million within 45 days of its May 14, 2009 Order; -1- STIPULATION AND [] ORDER REGARDING DISCHARGE OF BOND CASE NO. CV 00-20905 RMW 1 WHEREAS, on June 26, 2009, Hynix posted a supersedeas bond, Bond No. CGB 2 8960181 issued by Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and Zurich American Insurance 3 Company, in the amount to $250 million in accordance with the Court’s Order of May 14, 2009; 4 WHEREAS, on September 17, 2010, the Court ordered that Hynix post a supersedeas 5 bond in the full amount of the Final Judgment within 30 days in order to maintain the stay of 6 execution; 7 WHEREAS, on October 18, 2010, Hynix posted a supersedeas bond, in the form of a 8 Rider to Bond No. CGB 8960181, issued by Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and 9 Zurich American Insurance Company, in the full amount of the Final Judgment, together with 10 post-judgment interest through October 18, 2010 in accordance with the Court’s Order of 11 September 17, 2010 (hereinafter, Bond No. CGB 8960181 and the Rider to Bond No. CGB 12 8960181 are collectively referred to as “the bond”) ; 13 14 15 16 17 WHEREAS, on May 13, 2011, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated the Final Judgment against Hynix and remanded for further proceedings; WHEREAS, on January 11, 2012, the Court ordered that Hynix’s obligation to maintain a supersedeas bond in respect of the judgment of March 10, 2009, was released; WHEREAS, Hynix and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and Zurich American 18 Insurance Company have requested that Rambus Inc. (“Rambus”) enter into this stipulation 19 clarifying certain aspects of the scope of this Court’s January 11, 2012 Order; 20 21 WHEREAS, Rambus understands that the import of paragraph (2) on page 13 of the Court’s Order of January 11, 2012, is that the bond is released and exonerated; and 22 WHEREAS, Hynix and Rambus each acknowledges and agrees that Rambus’s and 23 Hynix’s agreement to this stipulation is without waiver of any and all rights that either Rambus or 24 Hynix may have with regard to the judgment of March 10, 2009, and the subsequent remand 25 proceedings, including Hynix’s and/or Rambus’s rights, if any, to appeal or otherwise challenge 26 the Court’s Order of January 11, 2012, save and except for Rambus’s right to seek 27 reconsideration of or appeal from the release and exoneration of the bond, 28 -2- STIPULATION AND [ OF BOND CASE NO. CV 00-20905 RMW 1 NOW, THEREFORE, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE COURT, IT IS 2 HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among the undersigned counsel for Hynix and 3 Rambus, that the below Order may be entered by the Court. 4 DATED: February 8, 2012 5 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP By: /s/ Gregory P. Stone Gregory P. Stone 6 7 Counsel for Rambus Inc. 8 9 DATED: February 8, 2012 10 KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON, LLP By: /s/ Theodore G. Brown, III Theodore G. Brown, III 11 12 Counsel for Hynix Semiconductor Inc.; Hynix Semiconductor America Inc.; Hynix Semiconductor U.K. Ltd.; and Hynix Semiconductor Deutschland GmbH 13 14 15 16 ORDER 17 In furtherance of the Court's Order of January 11, 2012, and for the reasons set forth 18 19 therein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) The Supersedeas Bond posted in this case, Fidelity and Deposit Company of 20 Maryland and Zurich American Insurance Company Bond No. CGB 8960181, and the Rider 21 thereto, are hereby unconditionally released and exonerated and Fidelity and Deposit Company of 22 Maryland and Zurich American Insurance Company are hereby released from all liability under 23 the terms of the Supersedeas Bond and the Rider; 24 (2) The clerk is directed to release the original bond(s) to counsel for Hynix; and 25 (3) Any and all rights that Rambus and/or Hynix may have with regard to the 26 judgment of March 10, 2009, and the subsequent remand proceedings, including Rambus’s and/or 27 Hynix’s rights, if any, to appeal or otherwise challenge the Court’s Order of January 11, 2012, are 28 -3- STIPULATION AND [] ORDER REGARDING DISCHARGE OF BOND CASE NO. CV 00-20905 RMW 1 preserved and are not waived, save and except for Rambus’s right to seek reconsideration of or 2 appeal from the release and exoneration of the Supersedeas Bond and Rider referred to above. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 DATED: February ___, 2012 6 7 Honorable Ronald M. Whyte United States District Court Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 63969953 v1 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4- STIPULATION AND [] ORDER REGARDING DISCHARGE OF BOND CASE NO. CV 00-20905 RMW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?