Hyundai Electronics, et al v. Rambus, Inc.
Filing
4189
STIPULATION AND ORDER 4188 Permitting a Consolidated Opposition to Hynix's Motions. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 11/20/12. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
Gregory P. Stone (SBN 078329)
Steven M. Perry (SBN 106154)
Fred A. Rowley, Jr. (SBN 192298)
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
355 South Grand Avenue, 35th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071-1560
Telephone:
(213) 683-9100
Facsimile:
(213) 687-3702
Email: Gregory.Stone@mto.com
Email: Fred.Rowley@mto.com
Rollin A. Ransom (SBN 196192)
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
555 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000
Los Angeles, California 90013-1010
Telephone: (213) 896-6000
Facsimile: (213) 896-6600
Email: rransom@sidley.com
6
7
8
9
Peter A. Detre (SBN 182619)
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
560 Mission Street, 27th Floor
San Francisco, California 94105-2907
Telephone:
(415) 512-4000
Facsimile:
(415) 512-4077
Email: peter.detre@mto.com
10
11
Attorneys for RAMBUS INC.
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
15
16
HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
17
18
vs.
19
CASE NO. CV 00-20905 RMW
STIPULATION AND []
ORDER PERMITTING A
CONSOLIDATED OPPOSITION TO
HYNIX’S MOTIONS
RAMBUS INC.,
Defendant.
20
21
Date:
Time:
Location:
Judge:
December 19, 2012
2:00 p.m.
Courtroom 6 (4th Flr.)
Hon. Ronald M. Whyte
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
19292295.1
STIPULATION AND [] ORDER
RE: OPP’N BRIEF TO HYNIX MOTIONS
CASE NO. 00-20905-RMW
1.
1
On October 17, 2012, Hynix filed the following motions in the above-
2
captioned matter: (a) Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Reply to Defendant and
3
Counterclaim Plaintiff Rambus Inc.’s Amended Counterclaim; (b) Motion for Summary
4
Judgment or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment on the Issue of the Collateral
5
Estoppel Effect of Reexaminations of Rambus’s Patents; and (c) Motion for New Trial, or in the
6
Alternative, Motion for Stay (collectively, the “ Hynix Motions”).
7
2.
On November 5, 2012, Hynix filed a Supplemental Memorandum in
8
support of the Hynix Motions.
9
3.
Pursuant to the Stipulation and Order Adjusting Briefing Schedule and
10
Hearing Date, entered November 15, 2012, Rambus’s opposition papers to the Hynix Motions are
11
due on November 20, 2012.
4.
12
Under Local Rule 7-4, Rambus is permitted to file an opposition brief of up
13
to 25 pages in response to each of the Hynix Motions, for a total of 75 pages. Under Local Rule
14
7-4, Hynix is permitted to file a reply brief of up to 15 pages regarding each of the Hynix
15
Motions, for a total of 45 pages.
16
5.
In the interest of judicial efficiency, the parties stipulate that Rambus shall
17
be permitted to file a single consolidated opposition brief, not to exceed 55 pages, in response to
18
the Hynix Motions.
19
//
20
//
21
//
22
//
23
//
24
//
25
//
26
//
27
//
28
//
19292295.1
-1-
STIPULATION AND [] ORDER
RE: OPP’N BRIEF TO HYNIX MOTIONS
CASE NO. 00-20905-RMW
6.
1
The parties further stipulate that Hynix shall be permitted to file either
2
three reply briefs, not to exceed fifteen pages each or, at Hynix’s election, a single consolidated
3
reply brief not to exceed 40 pages regarding the three Hynix Motions.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
4
5
Dated: November 16, 2012
6
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
7
8
By:
/s/ Jeffrey Y. Wu
Jeffrey Y. Wu
9
Attorneys for RAMBUS INC.
10
11
12
Dated: November 16, 2012
13
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON
LLP
14
15
By:
/s/ Jeffrey Y. Wu for
Theodore G. Brown III
Theodore G. Brown III
16
17
Attorneys for HYNIX
SEMICONDUCTOR INC., HYNIX
SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA INC.,
HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR U.K. LTD.,
and HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR GmbH
18
19
20
ORDER
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23
Dated: November
, 2012
Hon. Ronald M. Whyte
United States District Judge
24
25
26
27
28
19292295.1
-2-
STIPULATION AND [] ORDER
RE: OPP’N BRIEF TO HYNIX MOTIONS
CASE NO. 00-20905-RMW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?