Elena Del Campo v. American Corrective Counseling

Filing 1193

ORDER VACATING FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; SETTING PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE Discovery due by 12/12/2011. Joint Preliminary Pretrial Conference Statement due by 11/11/2011. Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 11/14/2011 11:00 AM in Courtroom 15, 18th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. James Ware. Signed by Judge James Ware on 7/5/11. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
NO. C 01-21151 JW

Elena M. Del Campo, et al.,

11

ORDER VACATING FURTHER CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;
SETTING PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL
CONFERENCE

Plaintiffs,
v.

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
Don Mealing, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
15

/
This case is scheduled for a Further Case Management Conference on July 11, 2011. On

16

July 2, 2011 the parties filed a Joint Further Case Management Conference Statement. (See Docket

17

Item No. 1192.) In their Joint Statement, the parties dispute whether the Court’s May 20, 2011

18

Order granted a new trial as to all issues or solely as to those raised in Defendants’ Motion. (Id. at

19

3-4.) The parties further contend that clarification of the Court’s May 20 Order would affect the

20

trial schedules proposed in their Joint Statement. (Id. at 12.) Moreover, Defendants have a pending

21

Motion to Disqualify Plaintiffs’ Counsel set for a hearing on September 12, 2011 at 9 a.m.

22

In light of the parties’ contention that clarification of the Court’s May 20 Order would affect

23

their proposed trial schedule and in light of Defendants’ pending Motion, the Court finds good cause

24

to VACATE the July 11 Conference.

25

Further, the Court clarifies its May 20 Order as follows: In its May 20 Order, the Court

26

granted a new trial as to all issues remaining and did not limit the trial to those issues raised in

27

Defendants’ Motion, including those issues raised in Plaintiffs’ Motions: (1) actual damages; and (2)

28

the liability of Inc. Fundamentals.

1

Because the Court has granted a new trial on all issues, and because Plaintiffs have

2

demonstrated good cause for the need for additional discovery, the Court sets a new deadline for the

3

close of all discovery for December 12, 2011 and orders as follows:

4

(1)

5
6

The parties shall appear for a Preliminary Pretrial Conference on November 14, 2011
at 11 a.m.

(2)

On or before November 11, 2011, the parties shall file a Joint Preliminary Pretrial

7

Conference Statement that includes, inter alia, a good faith proposed schedule for

8

trial.

9
Dated: July 5, 2011
JAMES WARE
United States District Chief Judge

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2

1

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO:

2

Anthony Joseph DeCristoforo [e-mail]
Brett Marshall Godfrey [e-mail]
David L. Hartsell [e-mail]
Eric Neil Landau [e-mail]
George Stephen Azadian [e-mail]
Hugh Tabor Verano [e-mail]
John David Higginbotham [e-mail]
Joshua G Blum [e-mail]
Julie N. Richards [e-mail]
Kendra S. Canape [e-mail]
Lester A. Perry [e-mail]
Lucius Wallace [e-mail]
Michael Andrew Taitelman [e-mail]
Natalie P. Vance [e-mail]
O. Randolph Bragg [e-mail]
Paul Arons [e-mail]
Peter Manfred Bransten [e-mail]
Robert David Humphreys [e-mail]
Ronald Wilcox [e-mail]
Sharon Kathleen Grace [e-mail]

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13

Dated: July 5, 2011

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

14
By:
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

/s/ JW Chambers
Susan Imbriani
Courtroom Deputy