Lara v. Posner et al

Filing 67

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO REISSUE SUMMONS TO DEFENDANT HAFFNER. The clerk shall re-issue a summons and the United States Marshal shall serve, without repayment of fees, a copy of the amended complaint in this matter (Docket No. 12), all attachments th ereto, a copy of the Courts order filed November 9, 2006, (Docket No. 17), and a copy of this order to defendant Haffner at the addresses provided by plaintiff. (Docket No. 65.). Signed by Judge James Ware on 12/11/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

JOSE LUIS LARA, Plaintiff, vs. DR. POSNER, et al., Defendants.

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. C 02-05429 JW (PR) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO REISSUE SUMMONS TO DEFENDANT HAFFNER

Plaintiff, a California inmate proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs by Salinas Valley State Prison ("SVSP") employees. In accordance with the Court order filed October 19, 2009, (Docket No. 62), plaintiff filed location information for Defendant Dr. Haffner current address. (Docket No. 65.) Based on this information, the Court will order the clerk to reissue summons to defendant Haffner at the two addresses provided by plaintiff.

CONCLUSION It is hereby ordered as follows: 1. The clerk shall re-issue a summons and the United States Marshal

Order Directing Clerk to Reissue Summons P:\PRO-SE\SJ.JW\CR.02\Lara05429_reissue summons.3.wpd

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

shall serve, without prepayment of fees, a copy of the amended complaint in this matter (Docket No. 12), all attachments thereto, a copy of the Court's order filed November 9, 2006, (Docket No. 17), and a copy of this order to defendant Haffner at the addresses provided by plaintiff. (Docket No. 65.) 2. In order to expedite the resolution of this case; a. Defendant shall, within sixty (60) days from the date he is

served with the amended complaint, file a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion, or shall notify the Court that he is of the opinion that this case cannot be resolved by such a motion. The motion shall be supported by adequate factual documentation and shall conform in all respects to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Defendant is advised that summary judgment cannot be granted, nor qualified immunity found, if material facts are in dispute. If defendant is of the opinion that this case cannot be resolved by summary judgment, he shall so inform the Court prior to the date the summary judgment motion is due. All papers filed with the Court shall be served promptly on plaintiff. b. Plaintiff's opposition to the dispositive motion shall be filed with the Court and served on defendant's counsel not later than thirty (30) days from the date defendant's motion is filed. The Ninth Circuit has held that the following notice should be given to pro se plaintiffs: The defendants have made a motion for summary judgment by which they seek to have your case dismissed. A motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will, if granted, end your case. Rule 56 tells you what you must do in order to oppose a motion for summary judgment. Generally, summary judgment must be granted when there is no genuine issue of material fact--that is, if there is no real dispute about any fact that would affect the result of your case, the party who asked for summary judgment is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, which will end your case. When a party you are suing makes a motion for summary judgment that is properly supported by declarations (or other sworn testimony), you cannot simply rely on what your complaint says. Instead, you must set out specific facts in declarations, depositions, answers to interrogatories, or authenticated
Order Directing Clerk to Reissue Summons P:\PRO-SE\SJ.JW\CR.02\Lara05429_reissue summons.3.wpd

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

documents, as provided in Rule 56(e), that contradict the facts shown in the defendant's declarations and documents and show that there is a genuine issue of material fact for trial. If you do not submit your own evidence in opposition, summary judgment, if appropriate, may be entered against you. If summary judgment is granted in favor of defendants, your case will be dismissed and there will be no trial. See Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 963 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc). Plaintiff is advised to read Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 106 S. Ct. 2548, 91 L. Ed. 2d 265 (1986) (holding party opposing summary judgment must come forward with evidence showing triable issues of material fact on every essential element of his claim). Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to file an opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment may be deemed to be a consent by plaintiff to the granting of the motion, and granting of judgment against plaintiff without a trial. See Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53-54 (9th Cir. 1995) (per curiam); Brydges v. Lewis, 18 F.3d 651, 653 (9th Cir. 1994). c. Defendant may file a reply brief no later than fifteen (15) days after plaintiff's opposition is filed. d. The motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply brief is due. No hearing will be held on the motion unless the Court so orders at a later date. 3. Discovery may be taken in accordance with the Federal Rules of

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Civil Procedure. No further Court order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(a)(2) or Local Rule 16-1 is required before the parties may conduct discovery. 4. All communications by plaintiff with the Court must be served on

defendant's counsel once counsel has been designated, by mailing a true copy of the document to defendant's counsel.

DATED:

December 11, 2009

JAMES WARE United States District Judge

Order Directing Clerk to Reissue Summons P:\PRO-SE\SJ.JW\CR.02\Lara05429_reissue summons.3.wpd

3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE LUIS LARA, Plaintiff, v. DR. POSNER, et al., Defendants. /

Case Number: CV02-05429 JW CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California.
12/18/2009 , I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the That on attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.

Jose Luis Lara K-26793 Calipatria State Prison P. O. Box 5006 Calipatria, Ca 92233 Dated:
12/18/2009 /s/ By:

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk Elizabeth Garcia, Deputy Clerk