Jenkins v. Caplan et al

Filing 138

ORDER Directing Defendants to Show Cause or File Statement of Non-Opposition. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 9/13/10. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2010)

Download PDF
Jenkins v. Caplan et al Doc. 138 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA *E-FILED - 9/13/10* ROBERT LEE JENKINS, JR., v. Plaintiff, CAPLAN, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 02-5603 RMW (PR) ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO SHOW CAUSE OR FILE STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 7, 2007, plaintiff filed a third amended complaint. On February 9, 2010, the court granted defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust and dismissed all defendants except Caplan, who had yet to be served. In light of Rhodes v. Robinson, No. 08-16363 (9th Cir. Sept. 8, 2010), respondent is directed to show cause why the court should not vacate its February 9, 2010 order. Within seven (7) days of the filing date of this order, defendants shall file a response or statement of nonopposition. If defendants fail to file a response, the court will assume that defendants do not oppose vacating the February 9, 2010 order. IT IS SO ORDERED. 9/13/10 DATED: RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge Order Directing Defendants to Show Cause or File Statement of Non-Opposition P:\PRO-SE\SJ.Rmw\CR old\Cr.02\Jenkins603rhodes.wpd Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Order Directing Defendants to Show Cause or File Statement of Non-Opposition P:\PRO-SE\SJ.Rmw\CR old\Cr.02\Jenkins603rhodes.wpd2 On 9/13/10 , a copy of this ruling was mailed to the following: Robert Lee Jenkins, Jr. H-53355 CMC - East AQ 1134 P.O. Box 8101 San Luis Obispo, CA 93409-8101

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?