Jenkins v. Caplan et al

Filing 199

ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte Denying 194 Motion for Transcripts. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT LEE JENKINS, JR., Plaintiff, 11 12 13 v. CAPLAN, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 02-5603 RMW (PR) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR TRANSCRIPTS (Docket No. 194.) On June 7, 2007, plaintiff Robert Lee Jenkins, Jr., proceeding pro se, filed a third 17 amended civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants filed a motion for 18 summary judgment. On March 30, 2012, the court granted defendants’ motion for summary 19 judgment. (Doc. No. 190.) Plaintiff has filed a motion for transcripts. (Doc. No. 194). 20 21 22 Given that there were no hearings held in this case, there are no transcripts. Plaintiff’s motion is therefore DENIED. This order terminates docket no. 194. 23 24 25 DATED: RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge 26 27 28 Order Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Transcripts G:\PRO-SE\SJ.Rmw\CR old\Cr.02\Jenkins603deny-trans.wpd UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JENKINS, Case Number: CV02-05603 RMW Plaintiff, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE v. CAPLAN ET AL et al, Defendant. / I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on December 3, 2012, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. Robert Lee Jenkins H-53355 A3-144-L High Desert State Prison Post Office Box 3030 Susanville, CA 96127 Dated: December 3, 2012 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Jackie Lynn Garcia, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?