Jenkins v. Caplan et al
Filing
199
ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte Denying 194 Motion for Transcripts. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
ROBERT LEE JENKINS, JR.,
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
v.
CAPLAN, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. C 02-5603 RMW (PR)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR TRANSCRIPTS
(Docket No. 194.)
On June 7, 2007, plaintiff Robert Lee Jenkins, Jr., proceeding pro se, filed a third
17
amended civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants filed a motion for
18
summary judgment. On March 30, 2012, the court granted defendants’ motion for summary
19
judgment. (Doc. No. 190.) Plaintiff has filed a motion for transcripts. (Doc. No. 194).
20
21
22
Given that there were no hearings held in this case, there are no transcripts. Plaintiff’s
motion is therefore DENIED.
This order terminates docket no. 194.
23
24
25
DATED:
RONALD M. WHYTE
United States District Judge
26
27
28
Order Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Transcripts
G:\PRO-SE\SJ.Rmw\CR old\Cr.02\Jenkins603deny-trans.wpd
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JENKINS,
Case Number: CV02-05603 RMW
Plaintiff,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
v.
CAPLAN ET AL et al,
Defendant.
/
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on December 3, 2012, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing
said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by
depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office
delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
Robert Lee Jenkins H-53355
A3-144-L
High Desert State Prison
Post Office Box 3030
Susanville, CA 96127
Dated: December 3, 2012
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Jackie Lynn Garcia, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?