Agnes Suever, et al v. Kathleen Connell, MD, et al

Filing 259

ORDER by Judge Seeborg granting 256 Motion to Seal (rslc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2008)

Download PDF
Agnes Suever, et al v. Kathleen Connell, MD, et al Doc. 259 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION *E-Filed 02/01/2008* United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendants' motion filed January 31, 2008 is granted to the following extent and is otherwise denied. Good cause appearing, it is hereby ordered that the following documents be placed under seal pending the a ruling on defendants' motion for a protective order: (1) Exhibits A, B and C to plaintiffs' Motion for Denial or Continuance of Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Under FRCP Rule 56(f), filed on December 24, 2007; (2) Exhibits A, B and C to the Declaration of William Palmer in support of that motion; (3) Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants' Motion to Shorten Time for Motion for Protective Order re Privileged Documents, filed on January 17, 2008; (4) Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Protective Order re Privileged Documents, filed on January 23, 2008; and (5) Exhibit B to the Declaration of Antonio Negrete in support of that motion. 1 Dockets.Justia.com AGNES SUEVER, et al., v. Plaintiffs, NO. C 03-00156 RS ORDER KATHLEEN CONNELL, et al., Defendants. / 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 This ruling is without prejudice to plaintiffs' arguments that the documents have been publicly available from other sources, and that the documents were first publicly filed in this action over a month ago but defendants did not seek relief at that time. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 1, 2008 RICHARD SEEBORG United States Magistrate Judge United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?