Niva v. United States of America Department of The Interio
Filing
96
ORDER re 95 Stipulation filed by Eric Austin Niva. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/5/08. (rssec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2008)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
THE BOCCARDO LAW FIRM INC
ATTORNEYS AT LAW 111 W. ST. JOHN STREET, SUITE 400 SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA 95113 TELEPHONE (408) 298-5678
*E-FILED 12/5/08*
JOHN C. STEIN, SBN 39417 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT - SAN JOSE
) Case No.: C03-00908 RS GARY NIVA and ALINKA NIVA, as Administrators of the Estate of ) ) STIPULATION TO FILE FIRST ERIC AUSTIN NIVA, deceased, ) AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES ) AND ORDER Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ) BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, ) ) Defendants. ) ) IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by to the above-entitled action, by and and between their the parties
between
respective
counsel, that Plaintiffs be permitted to file their First Amended Complaint, alleging a wrongful death cause of action. It is further
stipulated that defendant shall have 45 days from the filing of the First Amended Complaint to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint.
-1-
STIPULATION TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
DATED:
December 5, 2008 BY:
THE BOCCARDO LAW FIRM, INC. __/S/_______________________ JOHN C. STEIN Attorneys for Plaintiffs
DATED:
December 5, 2008 BY:
JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO UNITED STATES ATTORNEY ___/S/______________________ CLAIRE T. CORMIER Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for Defendant
ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: December 5, 2008 ____________________ ___________________________ RICHARD SEEBORG United States Magistrate Judge
-2-
STIPULATION TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?