Ramirez v. Warden

Filing 85

ORDER by Judge Whyte granting 84 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer and vacating 82 Order and 83 Judgment. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2010)

Download PDF
Ramirez v. Warden Doc. 85 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND VACATING ORDER DISMISSING PETITION AND JUDGMENT--No. C-03-1817 RMW CCL E-FILED on 8/30/10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ANTHONY M. RAMIREZ, Petitioner, v. JAMES A. YATES, Warden, et. al., Respondents. No. C-03-1817 RMW ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND VACATING ORDER DISMISSING PETITION AND JUDGMENT [Re Docket No. 84] The court's June 21, 2010 order gave petitioner until August 21, 2010 to submit a list of material facts in dispute, an affidavit addressing specific issues, and other relevant supplemental evidence. Petitioner now seeks an extension of time to submit these items due to the fact that the prison facility where he is housed has been under lockdown since August 2, 2010. The court grants his motion for a 60 day extension of time. Petitioner has until October 20, 2010 to file supplemental evidence. The court hereby vacates the August 23, 2010 order, with the exception of the grant of Maitreya Badami's motion to withdraw as counsel. The court also hereby vacates the judgment Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 entered on August 23, 2010. Upon receiving petitioner's supplemental filings, the court will reconsider the pending motions. DATED: 8/30/10 RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND VACATING ORDER DISMISSING PETITION AND JUDGMENT--No. C-03-1817 RMW CCL 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?