Litmon v. Santa Clara County et al

Filing 105

STIPULATION AND ORDER 104 For Dismissal. The Plaintiff's Appeal is Dismissed. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 1/21/10. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
M IG U E L M Á R Q U E Z A c tin g C o u n ty C o u n s e l C o u n ty o f S a n ta C la r a S a n Jo s e , C a l i fo r n i a

MIGUEL MÁRQUEZ, Acting County Counsel (S.B. #184621) MELISSA R. KINIAYLOCTS, Lead Deputy County Counsel (S.B. #151915) MARCY L. BERKMAN, Deputy County Counsel (S.B. #151915) OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL 70 West Hedding, East Wing, 9th Floor San Jose, California 95110-1770 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendants EDWARD FLORES, LIEUTENANT DOUGLAS TAYLOR, MITCHELL CONNER, MICHAEL MEADE, M.D., CHRISTINE FERRY, ALEXANDER CHYORNY, M.D., and OFFICER CONNER

*E-FILED - 1/21/10*

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (San Jose)

) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) SANTA CLARA COUNTY, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________)

DAVID LITMON, JR.,

No.

C03-2054 RMW

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL

Plaintiff, David Litmon ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Edward Flores, Lieutenant Douglas Taylor, Mitchell Conner, Michael Meade, M.D., Christine Ferry, Alexander Chyorny, M.D., and Officer Conner ("Defendants"), hereby stipulate and agree to a binding Court order as follows: Whereas on May 2, 2003 Plaintiff filed a complaint. Whereas on March 29, 2004 this Court ordered service of the operative Second Amended Complaint. Whereas on March 31, 2009 the court granted Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and entered Judgment in favor of Defendants. Whereas on May 29, 2009 Plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal.

S tip u la tio n and Order for Dismissal

1

C 0 3 -2 0 5 4 RMW

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Whereas the Ninth Circuit has not docketed that appeal due to a separately existing Ninth Circuit pre-filing order governing pro per appeals filed by Plaintiff. Whereas during the Settlement Conference on November 13, 2009 the parties entered into a global settlement agreement involving Case Nos. C00-20345, C03-2054, and C09-2158. Whereas Plaintiff and Defendant agree to waive any claim for costs and/or attorneys' fees against one another. Now therefore, pursuant to Rule 42 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, the parties stipulate that the District Court may dismiss this appeal. IT IS SO STIPULATED:

Dated: January ___,2010

By: DAVID LITMON, JR. Plaintiff in Pro Per

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
M IG U E L M Á R Q U E Z A c tin g C o u n ty C o u n s e l C o u n ty o f S a n ta C la r a S a n Jo s e , C a l i fo r n i a

MIGUEL MÁRQUEZ Acting County Counsel Dated: January 20, 2010 By: /S/ MELISSA R. KINIYALOCTS Lead Deputy County Counsel Attorneys for Defendants EDWARD FLORES, LIEUTENANT DOUGLAS TAYLOR, MITCHELL CONNER, MICHAEL MEADE, M.D., CHRISTINE FERRY, ALEXANDER CHYORNY, M.D., and OFFICER CONNER

ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's appeal from District Court Case No. C03-2054 is dismissed. 1/21/10 Dated:_______________
235677.wpd

____________________________ RONALD M. WHYTE Judge of the Superior Court

S tip u la tio n and Order for Dismissal

2

C 0 3 -2 0 5 4 RMW