In re Ricoh Company Ltd. Patent Litigation

Filing 623

STIPULATION AND ORDER Modifying Briefing Schedule and Hearing Date on Supplemental Claim Construction Hearing re 622 Stipulation. Signed by Judge James Ware on 3/16/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/17/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

UNIT ED

KENNETH W. BROTHERS (Pro Hac Vice) [e-mail] GARY M. HOFFMAN (Pro Hac Vice) [e-mail] DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO, LLP 1825 Eye Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant RICOH COMPANY, LTD.

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

IN RE RICOH COMPANY, LTD. PATENT LITIGATION

Case No. 03-CV-02289 JW (HRL) STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE ON SUPPLEMENTAL CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING Courtrm.: Judge: 8, 4th Fl. Hon. James Ware

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE ON SUPPL. CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING Case No. C03-02289 JW (HRL)

A

C

LI

FO

m Judge Ja

es Ware

R NIA

DANIEL J. BERGESON, Bar No. 105439 [e-mail] DONALD P. GAGLIARDI, Bar No. 138979 [e-mail] HWAY-LING HSU, Bar No. 196178 [e-mail] BERGESON, LLP 303 Almaden Boulevard, Suite 500 San Jose, CA 95110-2712 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone]

S

ISTRIC ES D TC AT T

O ORD IT IS S

ERED

RT U O

NO

RT

H

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

STIPULATION Pursuant to N.D. Cal. Civil L.R. 6-2, Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Ricoh Company, Ltd. ("Ricoh"), Declaratory Judgment Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc. ("Synopsys"), and Defendants Aeroflex, Inc., AMI Semiconductor, Inc., Matrox Electronic Systems, Ltd., Matrox Graphics, Inc., Matrox International Corp., Matrox Tech, Inc. and Aeroflex Colorado Springs, Inc. ("Defendants"), by and through their respective counsel of record, do hereby stipulate and agree, and hereby jointly request, that the Court modify the schedule for the supplemental claim construction hearing as set forth in the Court's Order filed March 6, 2009 [Docket No. 621], at pp. 10-11. Counsel for all parties have multiple conflicts with the schedule, including a trial, appellate arguments, and overseas business trips. Counsel have met and conferred and agreed upon an alternative stipulated schedule set forth herein below, which the parties jointly and respectfully request that the Court adopt. As set forth in the accompanying declaration of Kenneth W. Brothers, the parties' stipulated schedule for the supplemental claim construction hearing does not impact the schedule for the case going forward. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties hereto that the schedule for the supplemental claim construction (Markman) hearing set forth in this Court's Order filed March 6, 2009 [Docket No. 621], at pp. 10-11, should be modified such that the supplemental Markman briefing schedule and hearing date shall be as follows: Exchange of opening supplemental claim construction briefs Exchange of reply supplemental claim construction briefs Supplemental Markman Hearing SO STIPULATED THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. Dated: March 12, 2009 BERGESON, LLP DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO, LLP By /s/ Kenneth W. Brothers, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant RICOH COMPANY, LTD.
-1STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE ON SUPPL. CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING Case No. C03-02289 JW (HRL)

due April 3, 2009 due April 17, 2009 May 22, 2009 at 9 a.m.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Dated: March 12, 2009

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI /s/ Ron E. Shulman, Esq. Attorneys for Declaratory Judgment Plaintiff SYNOPSYS, INC. and Defendants AEROFLEX, INC., AMI SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., MATROX ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, LTD., MATROX GRAPHICS, INC., MATROX INTERNATIONAL CORP., MATROX TECH, INC. and AEROFLEX COLORADO SPRINGS, INC. By

ORDER Based on the foregoing Stipulation and the accompanying Declaration of Kenneth W. Brothers, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the schedule for the supplemental claim construction (Markman) hearing set forth in this Court's previous Order filed March 6, 2009 [Docket No. 621] is vacated and the supplemental Markman briefing schedule and hearing date shall instead be as follows: Exchange of opening supplemental claim construction briefs Exchange of reply supplemental claim construction briefs Supplemental Markman Hearing due April 3, 2009 due April 17, 2009 May 22, 2009 at 9 a.m.

SO ORDERED.

March 16, 2009 Dated: March __, 2009___

Hon. Judge James Ware UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

_____

-2STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE ON SUPPL. CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING Case No. C03-02289 JW (HRL)