In re Ricoh Company Ltd. Patent Litigation

Filing 783

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 781 MOTION for Taxation of Costs Upon Remand filed by Synopsys, Inc., Set/Reset Deadlines as to 781 MOTION for Taxation of Costs Upon Remand. Synopsys's Replies due by 4/11/2012. Motion Hearing set for 4/30/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. James Ware. Signed by Judge James Ware on 3/27/12. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Gary M. Hoffman (Pro Hac Vice)
Kenneth W. Brothers (Pro Hac Vice)
Cathy Chen (Pro Hac Vice)
DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP
1825 Eye Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20006-5403
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]

Ron E. Shulman (State Bar No. 178263)
Terry Kearney (State Bar No. 160054)
Richard G. Frenkel (State Bar No. 204133)
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
140 Scott Drive
Menlo Park, CA 94025-1008
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]

Krista Carter (State Bar No. 225229)
DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP
700 Hansen Way
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1016
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]

Attorneys for Declaratory Judgment Plaintiff
Synopsys, Inc.

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Declaratory Judgment
Defendant Ricoh Company, Ltd.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14
15

IN RE RICOH COMPANY LTD. PATENT
LITIGATION

16
17
18
19
20
21
22

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case Number: C 03-02289 JW
STIPULATION MODIFYING REPLY
BRIEF DUE DATE AND HEARING DATE
ON SYNOPSYS’S MOTION FOR
TAXATION OF COSTS UPON REMAND
& [PROPOSED] ORDER
Date: April 30, 2012
Time: 9:00 a.m.
Judge: James Ware
Dept: Courtroom 9, 19th Floor

23
24
25
26
27
28

Page 1 of 4
Stipulation & [Proposed] Order

Case Number: 5:03-cv-02289-JW

1

Pursuant to N.D. Cal. Civil L.R. 6-2, Plaintiff and Declaratory Judgment Defendant

2

Ricoh Company, Ltd. (“Ricoh”) and Declaratory Judgment Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc.

3

(“Synopsys”), by and through their respective counsel of record, do hereby stipulate and agree,

4

and hereby jointly request, that the Court modify the schedule for Synopsys’s Motion for

5

Taxation of Costs Upon Remand hearing as set forth in the Court’s Order filed February 22,

6

2012 [Docket No. 780].

7

Synopsys filed its Motion for Taxation of Costs Upon Remand on March 19, 2012.

8

Ricoh’s Opposition to Synopsys’s Motion is due on April 2, 2012 and Synopsys’s Reply is due

9

on April 9, 2012. The Court’s Order filed on February 22, 2012 [Docket No. 780] set the

10

hearing date for April 23, 2012 at 9:00 AM.

11

Counsel for the parties have multiple conflicts with the current schedule including a

12

medical related conflict with the scheduled hearing on April 23, 2012 and a scheduling conflict

13

with the reply brief due on April 9, 2012. Counsel have met and conferred and agreed upon an

14

alternative stipulated schedule set forth herein below, which the parties jointly and respectfully

15

request that the Court adopt. Accordingly,

16

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties hereto that the schedule for Synopsys’s

17

Motion for Taxation of Costs Upon Remand hearing set forth in this Court’s Order filed

18

February 22, 2012 [Docket No. 780], should be modified such that the briefing schedule and

19

hearing date shall be as follows:

20

Synopsys’s Reply Brief

due April 11, 2012

21

Motion Hearing

April 30, 2012 at 9 a.m.

22

SO STIPULATED THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

23
24
25
26
27
28

Page 2 of 4
Stipulation & [Proposed] Order

Case Number: 5:03-cv-02289-JW

1
2

Dated: March 21, 2012

Respectfully submitted,
DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP

3
4

/s/ Kenneth W. Brothers
Gary M. Hoffman
Kenneth W. Brothers
Krista Carter
Cathy Chen
Counsel for Ricoh Company, Ltd.

5
6
7
8
9

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

10
11
12

Dated: March 21, 2012

13
14

/s/ Richard G. Frenkel
Ron E. Shulman
Terry Kearney
Richard G. Frenkel
Counsel for Synopsys, Inc.

15
16
17
18

ORDER
Based on the foregoing Stipulation and good cause appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the schedule for Synopsys’s Motion for Taxation of

19
Costs Upon Remand hearing set forth in this Court’s previous Order filed February 22, 2012
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

[Docket No. 780] is modified such that the briefing schedule and hearing date shall instead be as
follows:
Synopsys’s Reply Brief

due April 11, 2012

Motion Hearing

April 30, 2012 at 9 a.m.

SO ORDERED.
March 27
Dated: _________, 2012

_____
Hon. Chief Judge James Ware
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

27
28

Page 3 of 4
Stipulation & [Proposed] Order

Case Number: 5:03-cv-02289-JW

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

1
2
3

I, Kenneth W. Brothers, attest that I obtained the concurrence of Richard G. Frenkel in
filing this document. I declare under penalty of the laws of the United States that the foregoing

4
5
6

is true and correct.
Executed this 21st day of March 2012 at Washington, D.C.

7
/s/ Kenneth W. Brothers
Kenneth W. Brothers
Counsel for Ricoh Company, Ltd.

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Page 4 of 4
Stipulation & [Proposed] Order

Case Number: 5:03-cv-02289-JW