In re Ricoh Company Ltd. Patent Litigation
Filing
797
STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING DUE DATE FOR SYNOPSYS INC.'S OPPOSITION TO RICOH'S MOTION FOR STAY re 796 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER. Responses to Motion to Stay due by 6/11/2012. Signed by Chief Judge James Ware on June 7, 2012. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2012)
1
7
RON E. SHULMAN, State Bar No. 178263
ron.shulman@lw.com
TERRY KEARNEY, State Bar No. 160054
terry.kearney@lw.com
RICHARD G. FRENKEL, State Bar No. 204133
rick.frenkel@lw.com
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
140 Scott Drive
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: (650) 328-4600
Facsimile: (650) 463-2600
Gary M. Hoffman (Pro Hac Vice)
Kenneth W. Brothers (Pro Hac Vice)
Cathy Chen (Pro Hac Vice)
DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP
1825 Eye Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20006-5403
Phone (202) 420-2200
Fax (202) 420-2201
Email: hoffmang@dicksteinshapiro.com
brothersk@dicksteinshapiro.com
chenc@dicksteinshpiro.com
8
Attorneys for Plaintiff SYNOPSYS, INC.
Krista Carter (State bar No. 225229)
DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP
700 Hansen Way
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1016
Phone (650) 690-9500
Fax (650) 690-9501
Email: carterk@dicksteinshapiro.com
2
3
4
5
10
ERED
R NIA
O ORD
IT IS S
11
12
H
15
N
Attorneys for Defendant
RICOH COMPANY, LTD.
FO
RT
ER
LI
NO
re
13
mes Wa
Judge Ja
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
A
UNIT
ED
S DISTRICT
9 TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
6
F
D IS T IC T O
R
16
C
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
IN RE RICOH COMPANY LTD.
PATENT LITIGATION
CASE NO. C 03-02289 JW
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER MODIFYING DUE DATE FOR
SYNOPSYS INC.’S OPPOSITION TO
RICOH’S MOTION FOR STAY OF
APRIL 26, 2012 ORDER PENDING
APPEAL AND FOR EXPEDITED
CONSIDERATION
Date: June 18, 2012
Time: 9:00 a.m.
Judge: Hon. James Ware
Dept.: Courtroom 9, 19th Floor
27
28
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SILICON VA LLE Y
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
MODIFYING OPPOSITION DUE DATE
CASE NO.: C 03-02289 JW
1
WHEREAS, on April 26, 2012, the Court issued an order requiring Defendant Ricoh
2
Company, Ltd. (“Ricoh”) to pay to Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc. (“Synopsys”) the amount of
3
$675,154.75 by May 25, 2012 (D.I. 790, “the April 26 Order”);
4
WHEREAS, Ricoh filed a Notice of Appeal on April 21, 2012 (D.I. 791) and a Motion
5
for Stay of April 26, 2012 Order Pending Appeal and for Expedited Consideration on May 23,
6
2012 (D.I. 793, “Motion for Stay”);
7
WHEREAS, Synopsys opposes Ricoh’s Motion for Stay;
8
WHEREAS, Synopsys’s opposition to Ricoh’s Motion for Stay is due on June 6, 2012;
9
WHEREAS, the parties are currently negotiating a compromise regarding Ricoh’s
10
request for a stay of the payment of the $675,154.75 award to Synopsys in order to avoid further
11
motion practice;
12
WHEREAS, as set forth in the accompanying declaration of Richard G. Frenkel,
13
modification of the due date for Synopsys’s Opposition to Ricoh’s Motion for Stay will not
14
impact the schedule for the case going forward;
15
WHEREAS, counsel for the parties have met and conferred and agreed upon an alternate
16
due date for Synopsys’s Opposition to Ricoh’s Motion for Stay as set forth below, which the
17
parties jointly and respectfully request that the Court adopt.
18
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties pursuant to N.D. Cal. Civil
19
L.R. 6-2, that the due date for Synopsys’s Opposition to Ricoh’s Motion for Stay shall be June
20
11, 2012.
21
SO STIPULATED THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
22
23
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: June 6, 2012
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
24
25
27
By: /s/ Richard G. Frenkel
Ron E. Shulman
Terry Kearney
Richard G. Frenkel
28
Attorneys for SYNOPSYS, INC.
26
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SILICON VA LLE Y
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
MODIFYING OPPOSITION DUE DATE
CASE NO.: C 03-02289 JW
1
2
Dated: June 6, 2012
DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP
3
By: /s/ Gary M. Hoffman
Gary M. Hoffman
Kenneth W. Brothers
Krista Carter
Cathy Chen
4
5
6
7
Attorneys for RICOH COMPANY, LTD.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
ORDER
Based on the foregoing Stipulation and the accompanying Declaration of Richard G.
Frenkel, and good cause appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the due date for Synopsys’s Opposition to Ricoh’s
Motion for Stay is changed to June 11, 2012.
17
18
June 7
Dated: ____________, 2012
Hon. Chief Judge James Ware
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SILICON VA LLE Y
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
MODIFYING OPPOSITION DUE DATE
CASE NO.: C 03-02289 JW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?