Vargas v. Knowles

Filing 221

ORDER Re-Setting In Camera Telephone Conference. Conference set for 8/30/2012, 10:00 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 8/20/2012. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 *E-FILED: August 20, 2012* 3 4 5 6 NOT FOR CITATION 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 7 12 13 14 No. 03-cv-02930 EJD (HRL) EDDIE M. VARGAS, SR., ORDER RE-SETTING IN CAMERA TELEPHONE CONFERENCE Petitioner, v. MIKE KNOWLES, Warden, 15 Respondent. / 16 17 18 19 20 21 The previously scheduled in camera telephone conference with petitioner Eddie M. Vargas and attorney Jerry Fong is re-set as follows: 1. The in camera telephone conference is set for August 30, 2012, 10:00 a.m. It is expected that the phone conference will last no more than one hour. 2. The appropriate officials at the R. J. Donovan Correctional Facility shall make 22 all necessary arrangements for petitioner to have access to a telephone during the allotted time 23 for the conference call. 24 25 26 27 28 3. Mr. Fong shall serve a copy of this order on the prison and file a proof of service with the court. 4. Mr. Fong shall make necessary arrangements for a conference call and provide 1 the dial-in number (and any passcode) to the undersigned’s staff and to petitioner. 2 Dated: August 20, 2012 3 4 HOWARD R. LLOYD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 5:03-cv-02930-EJD A copy of this order has been sent by U.S. Mail to: 2 Eddie M. Vargas, Sr. K-63463, B-8 #137-L R.J. Donovan Correctional Facility P.O. Box 799002 San Diego, CA 92179-9002 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?