Vargas v. Knowles
Filing
221
ORDER Re-Setting In Camera Telephone Conference. Conference set for 8/30/2012, 10:00 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 8/20/2012. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2012)
1
2
*E-FILED: August 20, 2012*
3
4
5
6
NOT FOR CITATION
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
7
12
13
14
No. 03-cv-02930 EJD (HRL)
EDDIE M. VARGAS, SR.,
ORDER RE-SETTING IN CAMERA
TELEPHONE CONFERENCE
Petitioner,
v.
MIKE KNOWLES, Warden,
15
Respondent.
/
16
17
18
19
20
21
The previously scheduled in camera telephone conference with petitioner Eddie M.
Vargas and attorney Jerry Fong is re-set as follows:
1.
The in camera telephone conference is set for August 30, 2012, 10:00 a.m. It is
expected that the phone conference will last no more than one hour.
2.
The appropriate officials at the R. J. Donovan Correctional Facility shall make
22
all necessary arrangements for petitioner to have access to a telephone during the allotted time
23
for the conference call.
24
25
26
27
28
3.
Mr. Fong shall serve a copy of this order on the prison and file a proof of service
with the court.
4.
Mr. Fong shall make necessary arrangements for a conference call and provide
1
the dial-in number (and any passcode) to the undersigned’s staff and to petitioner.
2
Dated: August 20, 2012
3
4
HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
5:03-cv-02930-EJD A copy of this order has been sent by U.S. Mail to:
2
Eddie M. Vargas, Sr.
K-63463, B-8 #137-L
R.J. Donovan Correctional Facility
P.O. Box 799002
San Diego, CA 92179-9002
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?