Beltran et al v. County of Santa Clara et al

Filing 202

ORDER by Judge Whyte granting 200 Ex Parte Application (rmwlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' EX PARTE ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION C-03-03767 RMW TER E-filed on: 12/18/09 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION LORI BELTRAN et al., Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, et al., Defendants. No. C-03-03767 RMW ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' EX PARTE MOTION TO INCLUDE OMITTED RECORDS [Re Docket No. 200] Defendants' ex parte administrative motion to include in the court's record two documents that were inadvertently omitted from the electronic docket and seven pages inadvertently omitted from an exhibit previously submitted to the court is granted. Exhibits A, J and K to the Declaration of Melissa Kinyalocts in support of defendants' ex parte motion are hereby included in the court record. DATED: 12/18/2009 RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Notice of this document has been electronically sent to: Counsel for Plaintiff: Robert Ross Powell Dennis R. Ingols Douglas D. Durward Counsel for Defendants: Melissa R. Kiniyalocts melissa.kiniyalocts@cco.co.scl.ca.us Gregory Joseph Sebastinelli gregory.sebastinelli@cco.co.scl.ca.us Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel that have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program. Dated: 12/18 /2009 TER Chambers of Judge Whyte rpowell@rrpassociates.com dingols@rrpassociates.com Doug@durwardlaw.com ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' EX PARTE ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION C-03-03767 RMW TER 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?