Paulsen et al v. CNF, Inc et al

Filing 325

STIPULATION AND ORDER AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT Terminating Motions re Trial and Dispositive and Expert Motions Hearing and Setting Hearing on Preliminary Approval of Settlement re 324 Stipulation. The Court sets April 25, 2011 at 9 a.m. for a Hear ing on Preliminary Approval of Class Settlement. Becausethe Court must maintain its docket, all pending Motions are deemed as "withdrawn" and shall be terminated by the Clerk of Court. The parties may renotice their Motions should the set tlement not be finalized. Motions terminated: 286 MOTION Exclude Testimony and Opinions of Defendants' Proposed Expert, Kim Nicholl, and Strike Ms. Nicholl's Supplemental Report filed by Thomas A. Paulsen, Lloyd Michael O'Connell, I II, Robert Newell, Robert M. Bowden, Chester Madison, Edward L. Frazee, 283 MOTION for Summary Judgment Memorandum of Points and Authorities and Declaration of Susan Allison in Support Thereof filed by Towers Perrin Forster & Crosby Inc, [28 0] MOTION Notice and Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony and Opinions of Ian H. Altman; Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed by Towers Perrin Forster & Crosby Inc, 288 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Thomas A. Paulsen, Lloyd Michael O'Connell, III, Robert Newell, Robert M. Bowden, Chester Madison, Edward L. Frazee. Signed by Judge James Ware on 3/21/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2011)

Download PDF
Paulsen et al v. CNF, Inc et al Doc. 325 UNIT ED S S DISTRICT TE C TA ER N F D IS T IC T O R 3/21/2011 Dockets.Justia.com A C LI FO mes Wa Judge Ja re R NIA D RDERE IS SO O FIED IT DI AS MO RT U O NO RT H The Court sets April 25, 2011 at 9 a.m. for a Hearing on Preliminary Approval of Class Settlement. Because the Court must maintain its docket, all pending Motions are deemed as "withdrawn" and shall be terminated by the Clerk of Court. The parties may renotice their Motions should the settlement not be finalized. March 21, 2011

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?