Villa v. Knowles

Filing 46

ORDER REQUESTING FURTHER BRIEFING IN LIGHT OF NINTH CIRCUIT REMAND re 43 USCA Memorandum. On or before 6/21/2010, the parties shall file additional briefing addressing the remaining issues to be decided as instructed by the Ninth Circuit. Signed by Judge James Ware on 5/21/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Alfred Villa, v. Petitioner, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION NO. C 03-04766 JW ORDER REQUESTING FURTHER BRIEFING IN LIGHT OF NINTH CIRCUIT REMAND United United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Michael Knowles, Warden, Respondent. / On April 16, 2010, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal issued an order reversing and remanding for reconsideration of this Court's Order Denying Petitioner's Petition for Habeas Corpus. (Docket Item No. 43.) On May 13, 2010, the Ninth Circuit issued its Mandate. (Docket Item No. 44.) In light of the mandate, on or before June 21, 2010, the parties shall file additional briefing addressing the remaining issues to be decided as instructed by the Ninth Circuit. Dated: May 21, 2010 JAMES WARE United States District Judge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO: Glenn R. Pruden glenn.pruden@doj.ca.gov John H. Deist John.Deist@doj.ca.gov William M. Robinson bill@sdap.org Dated: May 21, 2010 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: /s/ JW Chambers Elizabeth Garcia Courtroom Deputy United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?