Google Inc. v. American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Inc.

Filing 113

ORDER SHORTENING TIME FOR BRIEFING AND HEARING MOTION. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 6/12/06. (jfsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2006)

Download PDF
Google Inc. v. American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Inc. Doc. 113 Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF Document 113 Filed 06/12/2006 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP 333 WEST WACKER DRIVE SUITE 2600 CHICAGO, IL 60606 Robert N. Phillips (SBN 120970) Ethan B. Andelman (SBN 209101) HOWREY SIMON ARNOLD & WHITE, LLP 525 Market Street, Suite 3600 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 848-4900 Facsimile: (415) 848-4999 David A. Rammelt (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Susan J. Greenspon (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Dawn M. Beery (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP 333 West Wacker Drive, Suite 2600 Chicago, IL 60606 Telephone: (312) 857-7070 Facsimile: (312) 857-7095 Attorneys for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff AMERICAN BLIND AND WALLPAPER FACTORY, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN BLIND & WALLPAPER FACTORY, INC., a Delaware corporation d/b/a decoratetoday.com, Inc.; and DOES 1100, inclusive, Defendants. AMERICAN BLIND & WALLPAPER FACTORY, INC., a Delaware corporation d/b/a decoratetoday.com, Inc., Counter-Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE, INC., Counter-Defendant. Date: June 23, 2006 Time: 9:00 a.m. Courtroom: 3 Hon. Jeremy Fogel Case No. C 03-5340-JF (EAI) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SHORTENING TIME FOR BRIEFING AND HEARING ON AMERICAN BLIND & WALLPAPER, INC.'S MOTION TO AMEND AND EXTEND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER DATES **E-filed 6/12/06** CH01/PLATC/210091.1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF Document 113 Filed 06/12/2006 Page 2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP 333 WEST WACKER DRIVE SUITE 2600 CHICAGO, IL 60606 WHEREAS the discovery cutoff under the Case Management Order is presently June 27, 2006, and the parties currently have a dispute over whether such date, and all other dates in the Case Management Order, should be extended. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Inc.'s ("American Blind") and Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Google Inc. ("Google") that the briefing schedule and hearing on American Blind's Motion to Amend and Extend Case Management Order ("Motion") be as follows: 1. 2. 3. 4. American Blind shall e-file its Motion on or before June 9, 2006; Google shall e-file its opposition papers no later than June 15, 2006; American Blind shall e-file its reply papers no later than June 20, 2006; The hearing on the Motion shall be at 9:00 a.m. on June 23, 2006. HOWREY LLP By: /s/ Robert N. Phillips____________ ROBERT N. PHILLIPS Ethan B. Andelman HOWREY LLP 525 Market Street Suite 3600 San Francisco, CA 94105 Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant AMERICAN BLIND AND WALLPAPER FACTORY, INC. KEKER & VAN NEST LLP By: /s/ Ajay Krishnan AJAY KRISHNAN Mark A. Lemley, Esq. Klaus H. Hamm, Esq. KEKER & VAN NEST LLP 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant GOOGLE INC. Dated: __________________ CH01/PLATC/210091.1 -2- Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF Document 113 Filed 06/12/2006 Page 3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP 333 WEST WACKER DRIVE SUITE 2600 CHICAGO, IL 60606 ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE OF FILING I, Robert N. Phillips, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the United States of America, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories to this document. /s/ Robert N. Phillips Robert N. Phillips IT IS SO ORDERED. 6/12/06 Dated: ______________________, 2006 ________________________________ Hon. Jeremy Fogel United States District Court Judge CH01/PLATC/210091.1 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?