Google Inc. v. American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Inc.

Filing 150

Google Inc. v. American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Inc.

Doc. 150

Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF

Document 150

Filed 07/17/2006

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 v. GOOGLE INC., Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION NO. C 03-5340 JF (RS) ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME *E-FILED 7/17/06*

AMERICAN BLIND & WALLPAPER FACTORY, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

/

Before the Court is defendant's motion for an order shortening time filed July 13, 2006. The request for shortened time is premised on the mistaken notion that the pending discovery cut off will render the underlying motion moot if it is not heard before that cut off. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 26-2, motions to compel as to outstanding discovery requests are timely if filed up to seven days after the discovery cut off. The passing of the discovery cut off does not preclude the completion of any discovery that may be ordered as the result of the Court granting a motion to compel that has been timely filed under that rule. Given that the Court recently denied a similar request for shortened time filed by plaintiff for this same reason, defendant's motion for an order shortening time is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 7/17/06

RICHARD SEEBORG United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME C 03-5340 JF (RS)

1

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF

Document 150

Filed 07/17/2006

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT NOTICE OF THIS ORDER HAS BEEN GIVEN TO: Ethan B. Andelman Dawn Beery [e-mail], [e-mail]

[e-mail]

Susan Jean Greenspon [e-mail], [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail] Ravind Singh Grewal [e-mail] [e-mail], [e-mail]; [e-mail]

Klaus Hemingway Hamm Ajay Krishnan Mark A. Lemley Michael H. Page

[e-mail], [e-mail]; [e-mail] [e-mail], [e-mail] [e-mail], [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail] [e-mail], [e-mail]

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

Robert Nathan Phillips David A. Rammelt

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

[e-mail], [e-mail]

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the Court's CM/ECF program. Dated: 7/17/06 Chambers of Judge Richard Seeborg By: /s/ BAK

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME C 03-5340 JF (RS)

2