Google Inc. v. American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Inc.
Filing
188
Attachment 6
Declaration of Ajay S. Krishnan
In Support of Counter-Defendant Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel Counter-Plaintiff ABWF To Satisfy Outstanding Discovery Obligations filed byGoogle Inc., Google Inc.. (Attachments: #
1 #
2 #
3 #
4 #
5 #
6 #
7 #
8 #
9 #
10 #
11 #
12 #
13 #
14 #
15 #
16 #
17 #
18 #
19)(Krishnan, Ajay) (Filed on 9/7/2006)
Google Inc. v. American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Inc.
Doc. 188 Att. 6
Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF
Document 188-7
Filed 09/07/2006
Page 1 of 5
..
..
...
...... . . . .. .'
. '.' .. .. .'.. ..
..
. .. . ..
,.
. . .. . ..... .
. .'
.. . . ........ ..... ..... .X ....1. F'" '............. . E' h'.-b- it........... .... ... .
.. "" ..'. .':' .... . .'", ".'" ".'. "..'. .' '.. .... .'. . . '., ..... . . . .' '.... -.."
; " :.:.::. " ", ':"'~:' " . , . :::, .' : . ::' .
..
.,..:..:.......:.:.~......:..~.......::....: .',', .... . -', ',' ..," :',' ',........... . ',- .. .... .: .~~.:......~..... .~. :....:..........., ~'.' ...... .
":', :-. ::. .:. ",', . .. ". .....' '.' '. . ... :.' '. . .'. . . ", . ". .: .' '. ,~:.. . '. '. . . '. . ,'". ..".. ':. . .: :" ~'. . : '... . ..... :'. ..: : ~ . '.\- '. .'. . .; .'. '. '. . ":., ..", "'" .:'~.", .
'. . . ..... . . '. . . '. . . . ~ .'. ' . . . '., . '.' . . '. . '. .' . . . '.:' . : :
~ " "',. ',.. '. '. '" ': "'..' '.. . .'. ............:...', . .... .-,' . ". '. "" '. . '". " ':'. .......... . . .',.
. . . .: '..
.. ..'.
. ..' '. ..
...
...
.
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF
i
Document 188-7
Filed 09/07/2006
Page 2 of 5
~
;. .
~-.
1 Robert N. Philips (SBN 120970)
L-
.2 HOWRY SIMON AROLD & WHITE, LLP
525 Market street, Suite 3600
'3 'San Francisco, CA .94105
Ethan B. Andelmai (SBN 209101)
Telephone,: .(~i5) 848-4900
. 4 Facsiniile: (41S) 84S-4999
5. David A. R'ammelt (Admitted'
..
Pro Hac Vice)
Susan J. Greenspon (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 6 Dawa lv. Beery (Admitted Prol:fåc Vice)
. KELLEY DRYE & WARN LLP .
7 333 West Wacker Drive,
Suite 2600 .
. Chicago,.IL '60606 . , . 8 Telephone: (312) 857-7070
. Facsimile:' (312) 8-57-7095 .
9
Attorneys for DefendantlCountér- Plaintiff ...10. .. AMERICAN BLIN AND WALLPAPER FACTOltY, INC.
, ll
.13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
. 12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFURN
. GOOGtE INC., a Delaware coiporation,
Case No. C 03-5340-JF (RS)
14
"'15
'Plaintiff, .
V. .
AMRICAN BLIND & WALLPAPER
FACTORY, INC.'S'RESPQNSE TO ' PLAINTIFF GOOGLE INC.'S FIRSt SE'T OF REQUESTS FÖR ADMISSION'
. ..
16
II Fi4~CTûRY, we..., a Dtja~vare. corpo'ration
i 7 dlbladecoratetoday.com, Inc,; and DOES .1-
AMERICAN BLIN & W ÅLLP MER
18
100, inclusive, . '.
Defendants.
19
: 20 . AMERICANINC., a & WALLPAPER BLIN Delaware coiporation FACTORY,
21 d//a decoratetoday.com, hic.,.' .
22
23
V. .
Counter-Plaintiff,
24
25 26
27
NETS
GOOGLE, INC., AMRICA ONLIN, INC" . . CAPE COMMUCA nONS .
CORPORATION, COMPUSERVE
INTERACTIVE SERVICES, INC., ASK. JEEVES, INC., ànd EARTHLJN INC.
. Counter-Defendants/ Tb,ird~Pary. Defendants
28
KEL.LEY DRYE'& .
t3 WES
. WARREN LLP WACKER DRIVE CHOIIPLA TC/206172.1 . Sum 260 ClilcAGO.ll 606
Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF
j¡
Document 188-7
Filed 09/07/2006
Page 3 of 5
~
L.'
1 PROPOUNING PARTY: PLAITIFF GOOGLE INC.
2 RESPONDING
PARTY:
DEFENDAN/COUNTER~PLAINTIF AMRICAN BLIN &
WALLPAPER
FACTORY? INC. .
3
. .8
.. . -. . . . .. . '. 13. ".. ". j'" . .. .4
5.
S.ET NUER:
ONE. .
DefendantlCountel~Plaintiff American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Inc.
6
7
("American Blind") hereby answers ~laintiff.9~ogle Inc.'~.(Google") First Set OfReq'uests For
Admission To American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Int. as rollows:
9
REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO, 1:
Admitthat if ai; ad appears on a'()oogl~ searcl: results'
10
1I
page when a user searched "ÍQI:
"American.
Blind & Wallpaper Factory?' only because the advertisers has selected "blind" as a
the ad doesnot.n~iude any
12
. B~OADMATCH KEYWORD, and that if
variant ofthe ALLEGED. .
. : . AMERICAN BLINS MARS in its text, no ALLEGED AMRlCAN BLINS MARS has
- (sic) bec~n "used" wltliin the ipeaningofthe _Lanam Act.
request for admission (a)-iitipropedy seeks concl~sioiiS' and/or
14 15
16 RESPONSE: - Objection. This
17
18
admissions of law that do not relate to the facts of this case, (b) presents a hypothetical question
which is not within the puiview ~fFed. R. Civ.. P. 36, (c) improperly se~~s to compel American
Blind to prove Google's legal position in this case; 'anq (d) could not he answered even with reasonable inquiry because 110 information known or Ieadily obtainable by American Blind could.
- 19
20
21
22"
23
24 .
allow it to fairly admit or deny the request. _ Furthermore, this request contains vague
ambiguous wording which fails to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 36 in that it does not present
simple conci.se statements of facts which would allow American Blind to" fairly admit or deny tht
. .. .
. . ."
- 2-
and ."
25
statements without explanation or qualificati0!l_
26
27.
. REQUEST FOR ADMISSION No, 2
28 - Admit that if an ad appears on a Google search results pag~ when a user searches.fojKE.i.LEY DRYE &
WARREN.LLP
3.T. WES
WACKER DRIVE CHO LIP LA TCI206172. l SUIT 2600
. QlICAW lL 60606
...... __'~r:._-'_.. .... .
Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF
.,
....., w. . Document 188-7
Filed 09/07/2006
Page 4 of 5
L.'
L-
.1
"american blind,"the user has no way to detenine for certain wheiler the ad's appearance was
triggered by the phrase "american. blind" or soine other word or phrase.
2
3
4
5'
RESPONSE: Objection. This request for admissìon (a) presents a h)yothetical question
. J1
which'is no.t within the.purvi~w of Fed. R. Civ. P. 36, and.
(b):could not b~.ai~ered even with
a
7 8
reason~ble inquiry because no infòrmation known or readily obtainabIe 'by. Amercan Blind
could
allow it to fairly admit or deny the request. Furtermore, this. requ~st con.taIns vague and
anibiguous .w?rding which fails to comply with Fed. R. Civ: P. 36 in that it does not'present
simple
9
lO
11
statements wÎthöut explanàtion or qllalificatioh.
12
.. .'
concise staterneiltsoffacts which would allow American Blind to fairly admit or deny the
13" " Dated: February 27,2006
14
15
KELLEY DRYE & WARRN LLP .
16
17
18'
'19
BY;_~~ .'
,\
David A. RaineIt '
Susan J. Greenspon
KELLEY DRYE 8! WARN LLP" . 3~3 West Wacker Drive, Suite 2600 .
Dawn M. Beery .
20',
21
. Chicago, IL 60606 .
:Rabert N. Philips '
Eth~B. Andelman
HOWRY SIMON AROLD
22
23
&
WHITE, LLP 525 Market Street, Suite 3600 San Francisco, CA 94105
TeIephone: (415) 848-4900
Facsimile: (415) 848-499'9
24'
25
Attorneys for DefendantlCounter-
, 26
27
P'laintiff AMERICAN BLIN .
AND WALLPAPER FACTORY, INC.
28
. KELLEY DRYE 8: WARREN LLP 33 WfSWAClER DRIVE 'CHOI/PLA TC/206172.1
SUITE 2600 CHICAGO, IL 60606
-3-.
Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF
,A '"
Document 188-7
Filed 09/07/2006
Page 5 of 5
L1
..--.l
.2
3
I am'a Citizen of
PROOF OF SERVICE
the United States and a resident of
the State ofIlJnois. I am .
..
4
,5,
6
7
8.
the bar of this Court, at employed:~!l Cook County, State of Ilinois, in the office of a member of who~e direction the service was:made. I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a pary to the within action, My businéss address is 333 W. Wacker Dnve, Suite 2aOO, Chicago, IL 60606. On.:
. the:date s~t 'forth b~low, I serve.d the document(s) described below in the maner described .
below: .
AMERICAN BLIND AND WALLPAPER FACTORY, INC.'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF GOOGLE INC.'S'FIRST SET nF REQUESTS FOR ADl\SSION
.. .. . .
Page'
I) .VIA FACSIMILE and U.S. MAIL
'10
i1
.Mièhàel It.
Márk A. ;Lemley
Klaus H. Ham .
Ajay S. Krshnan ,. Kéker& Van Nest, LLP
710 Sansome Street
12 13 14
San Franciscò, CA 94111
. XX(BYFACSIMILE) i am persanally and readily familiar with the business practice
1.5
16
17
Kelley Diye & Waren, LLP for collection and processing of document(s) to be transmitted. by facsimile 'ard I caused suc~ document( s) on this date to be transÏiitted'by' facsimile to the offices .
of
ofaddressee(s) at the J?umbëls 11stedbelow.
18.
.19
20
21'
practice of
(BY FEDERAL EXPRESS) I am personally and reaçiily familiar with the busiriess Kelley Drye & Warren, LLP for collection arid processing of cOrrespondence for overnight delivery, and I caused such document( s) described herein to be depasited for delivery to a facility regularly maintained by Federal Express for overnght delivery.
(BY MESSENGER SERVICE) byconsignip,gthe dócwnent(s) to an
authorized
courier and/or process server fOT hand delivery.on this date. .
22
23
XX(BY U.S. MAIL) I am personally and readily farliar. with the business practice of . Kelley brye & Warren, LLP for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United' States -Postal Service, and I caiisen such envelope(s)" with postage thereon fully prepaid to
bè placed in the United States Postal Service at Chicago, Ilinois. '
24
25
...~.~.
Executed on
..
Fehmary 27,2006, at Chicago, Ilinois:
26 27
28
K-ELLEY DRYE &
Caroline C. Plater
333 WES WACKR DRive CHO i /PLA TC/206 L72.l
SUITE 2600 CHICAGO.IL 6ll06
WARREN UP
'- 4-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?