Google Inc. v. American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Inc.

Filing 229

ORDER by Judge Jeremy Fogel granting 227 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages (jflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2006)

Download PDF
Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF Document 229 Filed 12/22/2006 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP MICHAEL H. PAGE - #154913 MARK A. LEMLEY - #155830 KLAUS H. HAMM - #224905 AJAY S. KRISHNAN - #222476 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 Telephone: (415) 391-5400 Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant GOOGLE INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN BLIND & WALLPAPER FACTORY, INC., a Delaware corporation d/b/a decoratetoday.com, Inc., and DOES 1100, inclusive, Defendants. AMERICAN BLIND & WALLPAPER FACTORY, INC., a Delaware corporation d/b/a decoratetoday.com, Inc., Counter-Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC., Counter-Defendant. Case No. C 03-5340-JF (RS) GOOGLE INC.'S AND AMERICAN BLIND & WALLPAPER FACTORY'S STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PARTIES ADDITIONAL PAGES FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING Judge: Hon. Jeremy Fogel 386190.01 GOOGLE INC.'S AND AMERICAN BLIND & WALLPAPER FACTORY'S STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PARTIES ADDITIONAL PAGES FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING CASE NO. C 03-5340-JF (RS) Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF Document 229 Filed 12/22/2006 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Google Inc. ("Google") represents to Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff American Blind & Wallpaper Factory ("ABWF") and to this Court that Google requires up to ten additional pages, beyond the normal 25-page limit, to adequately address the issues that it will raise in its forthcoming summary judgment motion, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that both parties may file briefs in support of or in opposition to Google's and ABWF's forthcoming summary judgment motions of up to ten (10) pages in excess of the normally applicable page limits. Thus, for any summary judgment motion filed, a party may file an opening brief of up to 35 pages in length, an opposition brief of up to 35 pages in length, and a reply brief of up to 25 pages in length. Dated: December 18, 2006 KEKER & VAN NEST By: /s/ Michael H. Page MICHAEL H. PAGE Attorneys for Plaintiff and CounterDefendant GOOGLE INC. Dated: December 18, 2006 KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP By: /s/ David A. Rammelt DAVID A. RAMMELT Attorneys for Defendant and CounterPlaintiff AMERICAN BLIND & WALLPAPER FACTORY PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 22 2006 __, By: HON. JEREMY FOGEL United States District Court Judge 1 386190.01 PLAINTIFF AND COUNTER-DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO GRANT PARTIES ADDITIONAL PAGES IN SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 7-11 CASE NO. C 03-5340-JF (RS)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?