Google Inc. v. American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Inc.

Filing 246

Attachment 1
Declaration Of Ajay S. Krishnan In Support Of Google's 244 Motion To Maintain The Current Scheule Or Abide By It As Closely As Possible filed byGoogle Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B# 3 Exhibit C# 4 Exhibit D# 5 Exhibit E)(Hamm, Klaus) (Filed on 12/29/2006) Modified on 1/5/2007 (gm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
Google Inc. v.sAmerican Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Inc. Me sage Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF Document 246-2 Filed 12/29/2006 Page 1Doc2 246 Att. 1 of . Page 1 of 2 Dot de Arco Fox From: Sent: To: Ajay Krishnan Friday, December 29, 2006 1:09 PM Dot de Arco Fox Subject: FW: Scheduling order From: Klaus Hamm Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2006 2:12 PM To: Ajay Krishnan Subject: FW: Scheduling order From: Michael Page Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 3:02 PM To: 'Greenspon, Susan'; Rammelt David A. Cc: Klaus Hamm Subject: RE: Scheduling order I'm not sure what you mean; the judge set a December 1 date for hearing of dispositive motions, so those motions have a filing cutoff of October 27. So we need to build a schedule that has the close of expert discovery before that date. From: Greenspon, Susan [mailto:SGreenspon@KelleyDrye.com] Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 2:55 PM To: Michael Page; Rammelt David A. Subject: RE: Scheduling order Michael: We would propose that we shorten the time for the cutoff of Expert Discovery to November 15 and thereby also shorten the time between that cutoff date and the cutoff date for filing of dispositive motions in order to accommodate the 4 month extension granted and the Judge's request for a December 1 cutoff date for the dispositive motions. Since Fogel clearly indicated that if more time was needed he would grant an extension of these cutoff dates, if you end up needing more time to prepare your dispositive motion(s), we would not object to such a request and you should be able to get whatever reasonable additional time you need. Let me know if this is acceptable to you. Thanks Susan Susan J. Greenspon KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP 333 W. Wacker Dr. Suite 2600 Chicago, Illinois 60606 (312) 857-7080 (direct) (312) 857-7095 (facsimile) 12/29/2006 Dockets.Justia.com Message Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF Document 246-2 Filed 12/29/2006 Page 2 of 2 Page 2 of 2 -----Original Message----From: Michael Page [mailto:MPage@KVN.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 11:19 AM To: Rammelt David A.; Greenspon, Susan Subject: Scheduling order Are you guys drafting an order on the new case schedule? Fogel was unclear on whether the court would issue one, but my sense is he is expecting one from us. He also introduced some confusion by first saying that everything would be pushed back 4 months, but then shifting gears and setting December 1as the last hearing date for motions (an extension of 3 months). If we start out extending all deadlines 4 months, we wind up with a last filing date for motions before the close of expert discovery. Let me know how you want to fix this; either by extending everything 3 months or squeezing somewhere in the middle. Pursuant to Treasury Regulations, any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication, unless otherwise stated, is not intended and cannot be used for the purpose of avoiding tax-related penalties. The information contained in this E-mail message is privileged, confidential, and may be protected from disclosure; please be aware that any other use, printing, copying, disclosure or dissemination of this communication may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you think that you have received this E-mail message in error, please reply to the sender. This E-mail message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses and are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened. However, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by Kelley Drye & Warren LLP for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use. 12/29/2006

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?