Google Inc. v. American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Inc.

Filing 247

Proposed Order Re Google's 244 Motion To Maintain The Current Scheule Or Abide By It As Closely As Possible by Google Inc.. (Hamm, Klaus) (Filed on 12/29/2006) Modified on 1/5/2007 (gm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
Google Inc. v. American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Inc. Doc. 247 Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF Document 247 Filed 12/29/2006 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP MICHAEL H. PAGE - #154913 MARK A. LEMLEY - #155830 KLAUS H. HAMM - #224905 AJAY S. KRISHNAN - #222476 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 Telephone: (415) 391-5400 Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter Defendant GOOGLE INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN BLIND & WALLPAPER FACTORY, INC., a Delaware corporation d/b/a decoratetoday.com, Inc., and DOES 1100, inclusive, Defendants. AMERICAN BLIND & WALLPAPER FACTORY, INC., a Delaware corporation d/b/a decoratetoday.com, Inc., Counter-Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC., Counter-Defendant. Case No. C 03-5340-JF (RS) [PROPOSED] ORDER RE GOOGLE'S MOTION TO MAINTAIN THE CURRENT SCHEDULE OR ABIDE BY IT AS CLOSELY AS POSSIBLE 386976.01 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE GOOGLE'S MOTION TO MAINTAIN THE CURRENT SCHEDULE OR ABIDE BY IT AS CLOSELY AS POSSIBLE CASE NO. C 03-5340-JF (RS) Dockets.Justia.com Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF Document 247 Filed 12/29/2006 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court has received plaintiff and counter-defendant Google Inc.'s ("Google") Motion To Maintain the Current Schedule or Abide by It as Closely as Possible, which was filed pursuant to Civil Local Rule 63. Pursuant to this Court's prior orders, the hearing date for filing dispositive motions was set for January 30, 2007, and the filing deadline for dispositive motions was therefore December 26, 2006. Because the Court is unavailable on January 30, 2007 to hear Google's Motion For Summary Judgment and Google's Motion for Terminating, Evidentiary, and Monetary Sanctions Against ABWF for Spoliation of Evidence (collectively, "Motions"), the hearing for those motions will be rescheduled for _________________, 2007, at _______ a.m./p.m. In the interest of fairness, any additional briefing time that results from the postponement of the dispostive-motion hearing will be divided evenly between the parties. To that end: ABWF shall file its opposition papers to Google's Motions no later than ____________, 2007; and Google shall file its reply papers in support of its Motions no later than ____________, 2007. Because the deadline for filing dispositive motions has passed, other than the Motions already filed by Google, no further dispositive motions shall be filed by either party. No other case management dates will be affected by this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: _____________________, 2007 _______________________________ Hon. Jeremy Fogel Judge of the United States District Court 1 386976.01 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE GOOGLE'S MOTION TO MAINTAIN THE CURRENT SCHEDULE OR ABIDE BY IT AS CLOSELY AS POSSIBLE CASE NO. C 03-5340-JF (RS)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?