Google Inc. v. American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Inc.

Filing 322

Google Inc. v. American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Inc.

Doc. 322

Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF

Document 322

Filed 05/25/2007

Page 1 of 6

1 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP

2 MA A. LEMLEY - #155830
KLAUS H. HAM - #224905
710 Sansome Street
4 San Francisco, CA 94111-1704

MICHAL H. PAGE - #154913

3 AJA Y S. KRSHNAN - #222476

Telephone: [phone]
5 Facsimile: [phone]

6

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter Defendant 7 GOOGLE INC.

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10

12 Plaintiff,
11 GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation,

Case No. C 03-5340-JF (RS)

13 v.

DECLARTION OF AJAY S. KRSHNAN IN SUPPORT OF GOOGLE'S RESPONSE TO ABWF'S FOUR DECLARTIONS REGARING- ABWF'S ALLEGED
PRESERVATION, COLLECTION, AND PRODUCTION OF MATERIALS IN RESPONSE TO APRIL 27, 2007 COURT ORDER

14 AMERICAN BLIND & WALLPAPER FACTORY, INC., a Delaware corporation
15 d//a decoratetoday.com, Inc., and DOES I100, inclusive,

16

Defendants. 17 Hon. Richard Seeborg

18 AMERICAN BLIND & WALLPAPER FACTORY, INC., a Delaware corporation
19 d//a decoratetoday.com, Inc.,

20 Counter Plaintiff,

21 v.
24
25

22 GOOGLE INC.,

23 Counter Defendant.
PUBLIC VERSION

26 27 28
1

396055.01

DECLARTION OF AJAY S. KRSHNAN IN SUPPORT OF GOOGLE'S RESPONSE TO ABWF'S FOUR DECLARATIONS REGARDING ABWF'S ALLEGED PRESERVATION, COLLECTION, AND PRODUCTION OF MATERILS IN RESPONSE TO APRI 27,2007 COURT ORDER CASE NO. C 03-5340-JF (RS)
Dockets.Justia.com

Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF

Document 322

Filed 05/25/2007

Page 2 of 6

1 I, Ajay S. Krshnan, declare as follows:

2

1.

I am an attorney at the firm of Keker & VanNest LLP, counsel for Plaintiff and.

3 Counter-Defendant Google Inc., and am admitted to practice before this Cour. I make ths
4 declaration in support of

Google Inc.'s Response to ABWF's Four Declarations Regarding
Materials in Response to April 27,

5 ABWF's Alleged Preservation, Collection, and Production of

6 .2007 Cour Order. Unless otherwse stated, I know the facts stated herein of my personal
7 knowledge and if called as a witness, I would testify competently thereto.
8

2.

Attached hereto as Exhbit A is a true and correct copy of an emaIl exchange

9 dated May 26, 2006, involving Michael Layne and Jeffrey Alderman, and which concerns a
10 search for responsive documents. The document was produced by ABWF in the course of

11 litigation, is Bates labeled ABWF 047376 - 047377, and was designated "Attorneys' Eyes Only"

12 by ABWF. It will therefore be filed under seal.
13 Description of ABWF's October 2005 Document Production
14

3.

The remainder ofthis declaration sumarizes ABWF's 2,790 page October 2005

15 document production, pursuant to the exception to the Best Evidence Rule contained in Federal
16 Rule of Evidence 1006, because this number of

pages canot be conveniently attached to

17 Google's submission or examined in cour. Whle the rule requires Google to make the

18 documents available to ABWF for examnation and copying at a convenient time and place, and
19 Google is happy to do so, it should be noted that ABWF already has access to these documents
20 since it was ABWF who produced them. Should the Cour desire copies, Google wil produce
21 them.

22

4.

The cover letter to ABWF's October 2005 production of documents is dated

23 October 26, 2005. It states that the documents in the production are labeled "ABWF 000001

24 though 2790," and that they are responsive to Google's first set of document requests. The first
25 and last pages of the production accurately reflect the Bates numbers indicated in the cover letter.

26

5.

Documents Bates labeled ABWF 000001 through ABWF 001522 consist of

27 cease-and-desist letters, complaints, settlement agreements, and varous other litigation or pre28
2
396055.01

DECLARATION OF AJA Y S. KRSHNAN IN SUPPORT OF GOOGLE'S RESPONSE TO ABWF'S FOUR DECLARATIONS REGARDING ABWF'S ALLEGED PRESERVATION, COLLECTION, AND PRODUCTION OF MATERIALS IN RESPONSE TO APRIL 27,2007 COURT ORDER
CASE NO. C 03-5340-JF (RS)

Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF

Document 322

Filed 05/25/2007

Page 3 of 6

1 litigation documents related to ABWF's efforts to enforce its alleged trademarks. (A single
2 document occurng later on in the production, Bates labeled ABWF 001794 through ABWF
3 001796, also fits withn ths category.) The vast majority of

the documents authored by ABWF

4 are authored by outside counsel. There are, however, a small number of emails or letters to
5 alleged infngers that theaten litigation and that were drafted by an ABWF employee. These
6 employee-drafted emails and letters, however, are tyically produced as par of a set of

7 documents that all pertin to the same matter (i.e., the same alleged infrnger), including emails
8 and letters drafted by outside counsel in the same matter.
9 6.

Documents Bates labeled ABWF 001523 through ABWF 001783 are emails

10 (occasionally with attachments) from an unown source account. The reason why the source

11 account is unown is that the top portion of each document is redacted. ABWF has not
12 supplied a reason for the redaction. If

the top portion were not redacted-as is the case for other

13 emails in the October 2005 production-the document would indicate the email account from

14 which the document was printed. The address information (i.e., the "To," "From," and "CC"

15 fields) from the most recent unedacted email in each email thread includes the email address for

16 Bil Smith or Joe Chamo. Thus, the implication is that Joe Chamo and Bil Smith forwarded
17 certain emaIls from their emaIl accounts to outside counsel, who printed these documents for the
18 document production. These emails are almost unformly communcations between ABWF and
19 Google.

20

7.

Documents Bates labeled ABWF 001785 though ABWF 001793 are three

L i

21 emails. The top portion of each document is unedacted, and it appears that these emails were

22 printed from the email account of Stephane Gilmarin. These thee emaIls are essentially cease23 and-desist letters, in which ABWF is seeking to enforce its alleged trademarks.

24

8.

Documents Bates labeled ABWF 001800 though ABWF 002058 are emails

25 printed from the email account of Jeffrey Alderman. These are almost unformly

26 communcations to or from Google. Only five were emails that were not sent to or from Google.
27 28
3

396055.01

DECLARATION OF AJAY S. KRSHNAN IN SUPPORT OF GOOGLE'S RESPONSE TO ABWF'S FOUR DECLARATIONS REGARING ABWF'S ALLEGED PRESERVATION, COLLECTION, AND PRODUCTION OF MATERIALS IN RESPONSE TO APRIL 27, 2007 COURT ORDER
CASE NO. C 03-5340-JF (RS)

Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF

Document 322

Filed 05/25/2007

Page 4 of 6

1

9.

Documents Bates labeled ABWP 002059 through ABWP 002272 are emails

2 printed from the email account of Steve Katzman. Every one of these emails were to or from

3 Google.

4

10.

Documents Bates labeled ABWP 002286 through ABWP 002677 appears to be

5 ABWP's trademark file. It contains documents submitted to or received from the USPTO or the
6 trademark offices of other countres with regard to ABWF's applications for its alleged
7 trademarks.
8

11.

Documents Bates labeled ABWF 002681 through ABWP 002714 are invoices

9 from Google to ABWF, for advertising on Google's AdWords program.
10
12.

Documents Bates labeled ABWP 002715 though ABWP 002790 are four audited

11 financial statements, for the years 1998 through 2004.
12 I state under penalty of perjury ofthe laws of

the United States of America that the

13 foregoing statements are true and correct. Executed May 25, 2007, at San Francisco, California.
14
15

Isl Aiav S. Krshnan AJA Y S. KRSHNAN

16 17
18

19

20
21

22
23

24
25

26 27
28
4
396055.01

DECLARATION OF AJA Y S. KRSHNAN IN SUPPORT OF GOOGLE'S RESPONSE TO ABWF'S FOUR DECLARATIONS REGARDING ABWF'S ALLEGED PRESERVATION, COLLECTION, AND PRODUCTION OF MATERIS IN RESPONSE TO APRIL 27, 2007 COURT ORDER CASE NO. C 03-5340-JF (RS)

Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF

Document 322

Filed 05/25/2007

Page 5 of 6

EXHIBIT A

Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF

Document 322

Filed 05/25/2007

Page 6 of 6

MANAL FILING NOTIFICATION

Regarding Exhibit A to the DECLARTION OF AJA Y S. KRSHNAN IN SUPPORT OF GOOGLES RESPONSE TO ABWFS FOUR DECLARTIONS REGARING ABWFS ALLEGED PRESERVATION, COLLECTION, AN PRODUCTION OF MATERIS IN RESPONSE TO APRI 27,2007 COURT ORDER
This filing is in paper form only, and is being maintained in the case file in the Clerk's offce. If you are a paricipant in this case, this filing wil be served in hard-copy shortly.

This document was not electronically fied because it is under seaL.