Google Inc. v. American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Inc.

Filing 329

Google Inc. v. American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Inc.

Doc. 329

Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF

Document 329

Filed 08/08/2007

Page 1 of 3

1 KEKER & V AN NEST, LLP

MICHAEL H. PAGE - #154913

2 MARA. LEMLEY - #155830
KLAUS H. HAMM - #224905 3 AJA Y S. KRSHNAN - #222476 710 Sansome Street
4 San Francisco, CA 94111-1704
Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone]
6 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter Defendant

GOOGLE INC.
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10

GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation,
11

Case No. C 03-5340-JF (RS)

Plaintiff,
12

v.
13
AMERICAN

BLIND & W ALLP APER

14 FACTORY, INC., a Delaware corporation d//a decoratetoday.com, Inc., and DOES 1-

15 100, inclusive,
16 17

DECLARATION OF AJA Y S. KRSHNAN IN SUPPORT OF PARTIES' STIPULATED REQUEST TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON GOOGLE INC.'S FORTHCOMING (1) RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND (2) MOTION TO STRIKE ABWF'S JURY DEMAND
Judge:
Hon. Jeremy Fogel

Defendants.
AMERICAN BLIND & W ALLP APER

Date Compo Filed: November 26, 2003

18 FACTORY, INC., a Delaware corporation
d/b/a decoratetoday.com, Inc.,
19

Trial Date:

November 13, 2007

Counter-Plaintiff,
20
v.
21

GOOGLE INC.,
22
Counter- Defendánt.
23

24
25

26 27
28
1

400629.01

KRSHNAN DECL. IN SUPP. OF PARTIES' STIPULATED REQ. TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON GOOGLE'S FORTHCOMING (1) RENEWED MOT. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND (2) MOT. TO STRIKE ABWF'S JURY DEMAND
CASE NO. C 03-5340-JF (RS)

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF

Document 329

Filed 08/08/2007

Page 2 of 3

1 I, Ajay S. Krishnan, declare as follows:

2

1.

I am an

attorney at the firm of

Keker & Van Nest LLP, counsel for Plaintiff

and

3 Counter-Defendant Google Inc., and am admitted to practice before this Cour. I make this
4 declaration in support of

the Parties' Stipulated Request to Set Briefing Schedule on Google

5 Inc;'s Forthcoming (1) Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment, and (2) Motion to Strike

6 ABWF's Jur Demand (the "Stipulated Request"). Unless otherwise stated, I know the facts
7 stated herein of my personal knowledge and if called as a witness, I would testify competently
8 thereto.

9

2.

Google intends to file, in the near future, two motions, a Renewed Motion for

10 Sumary Judgment, and a Motion to Strike ABWF's Jury Demand. After conferring with
11 counsel for ABWF, Google leared that both paries would be available

for a civil law-and-

12 motion hearing on September 28,2007, at 9:00 a.m. I therefore contacted the Cour's chambers
13 and reserved time on the Cour's civil law-and-motion calendar for that date and time.
14

3.

Both paries would benefit from an additional week to file opposition and reply

15 briefs with regard to Google's two forthcoming motions. Accordingly, the paries agreed to a

16 briefing schedule, set out in the Stipulated Request, that would provide this additional time.
17

4.

Other than requiring Google and ABWF to fie their opening and opposition

18 briefs earlier than they otherwise would have, this stipulated briefing schedule will have no

19 impact on the schedule for the case.
20
5.

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2(a)(3), the remainder ofthis declaration
my knowledge, all previous time modifications in this case.
On May 16,2005, the Cour adopted following schedule:

21 discloses, to the best of

22
23

6.
Cutoff of

Fact Discovery

February 27,2006

24
25

All Parties' Expert Reports Due

March 31, 2006
May 15, 2006

Rebuttal Expert Reports Due

26 27
28

Cutoff of Expert Discovery

June 30, 2006
July 31, 2006
2

Cutoff for fiing Dispositive Motions

400629.01

KRSHNAN DECL. IN SUPP. OF PARTIES' STIPULATED REQ. TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON GOOGLE'S FORTHCOMING (1) RENEWED MOT. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND (2) MOT. TO STRIKE ABWF'S JURY DEMAND CASE NO. C 03-5340-JF (RS)

Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF

Document 329

Filed 08/08/2007

Page 3 of 3

1

Pretrial Conference Statement
Pretrial Conference

October 2, 2006
October 13,2006 at 11 :00 a.m.

2
3

Trial Date

November 17,2006 at 11:00 a.m.

4 See May 16, 2005 Order (Docket Item No. 57).
5

7.

On February 16,2006, the Court issued an order stating "The Court extends all

6 case management dates by 4 months. The case is set for jury trial on 3/16/07 at 1 :30 p.m, pretrial

7 conference on 3/2/07 at 11 :00 a.m. and motion hearing on 12/1/06 at 9 a.m." See February 16,
8 2006 Order (Docket Item No. 95).

9

8.

On June 23, 2006, the Cour issued an order stating that "the Cour will amend

10 and extend the case management dates byonly sixty (60) days." See June 23, 2006 Order
11 Granting In Part Defendant's Motion To Extend Case Management Deadlines (Docket Item No.

12 113).
13

9.

On August 31, 2006, the Court extended the deadline for the serving of expert

14 reports from September 29,2006 to November 14,2006 and extended the deadline for the
15 serving of

rebuttal expert reports from November 14,2006 to December 5, 2006. See Stipulation

16 and Order Amending Case Management Dates for Expert Reports (Docket Item No. 180).
17

18 I state under penalty of perjury of the laws of the United States of America that the
19 foregoing statements are true and correct. Executed August 8, 2007, at San Francisco,

20 California.
21

22
23

/s/ Aiav S. Krishnan AJA Y S. KRSHNAN

24
25

26

27
28
3
400629.01

PARTIES' STIPULATED REQUEST TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON GOOGLE'S FORTHCOMING (1) RENEWED MOT. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND (2) MOT. TO STRIKE ABWF'S JURY DEMAND CASE NO. C 03-5340-JF (RS)