Google Inc. v. American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Inc.
Filing
33
STIPULATION AND ORDER extending time to respond to counterclaims and third-party claims. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 5/24/04. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2004)
Google Inc. v. American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Inc.
Doc. 33
Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF
Document 33
Filed 05/25/2004
Page 1 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP MICHAEL H. PAGE - #154913 MARK A. LEMLEY - #155830 RAVIND S. GREWAL - #220543 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 Telephone: (415) 391-5400 Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant GOOGLE INC. and Third-Party Defendants ASK JEEVES, INC. and EARTHLINK, INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN BLIND & WALLPAPER FACTORY, INC., a Delaware corporation d/b/a decoratetoday.com, Inc.; and DOES 1100, inclusive, Defendants. AMERICAN BLIND & WALLPAPER FACTORY, INC., a Delaware corporation d/b/a decoratetoday.com, Inc., Counterclaimant, v. GOOGLE, INC., AMERICA ONLINE, INC., NETSCAPE COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, COMPUSERVE INTERACTIVE SERVICES, INC., ASK JEEVES, INC., and EARTHLINK, INC., Counter-Defendants/ Third-Party Defendants.
Case No. C 03-5340-JF (EAI) STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COUNTERCLAIMS AND THIRD-PARTY CLAIMS
332145.01
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COUNTERCLAIMS AND THIRD-PARTY CLAIMS CASE NO. C 03-5340-JF (EAI)
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF
Document 33
Filed 05/25/2004
Page 2 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
The parties, through their counsel, hereby agree and stipulate as follows: · WHEREAS on May 4, 2004, defendant American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Inc. ("American Blind") filed its Answer, Affirmative Defenses, Counterclaims and Third-Party Claims; · WHEREAS Google Inc. and all of the third-party defendants have been served with American Blind's Answer, Affirmative Defenses, Counterclaims and ThirdParty Claims, and deem service to be effective; · IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED TO BY AND AMONG THE PARTIES THAT: the time for Google Inc., America Online, Inc., Netscape Communications Corporation, CompuServe Interactive Services, Inc., Ask Jeeves, Inc. and Earthlink, Inc. to answer or otherwise respond to defendant's counterclaims and third-party claims shall be extended thirty days, to on or before June 23, 2004.
Dated: May 21, 2004
KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP
/s/ Michael H. Page By: __________________________________ MICHAEL H. PAGE Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Google, Inc. and Third-Party Defendants Ask Jeeves, Inc. and Earthlink, Inc.
Dated: May 21, 2004
TAYLOR & COMPANY LAW OFFICES, INC.
/s/ Stephen E. Taylor By: __________________________________ STEPHEN E. TAYLOR Attorneys for Third-Party Defendants America Online, Inc., Netscape Communications Corporation and CompuServe Interactive Services, Inc. 1
332145.01
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COUNTERCLAIMS AND THIRD-PARTY CLAIMS CASE NO. C 03-5340-JF (EAI)
Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF
Document 33
Filed 05/25/2004
Page 3 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Dated: May 21, 2004
HOWREY SIMON ARNOLD & WHITE
/s/ Robert N. Phillips By: __________________________________ ROBERT N. PHILLIPS David A. Rammelt Susan J. Greenspon Dawn M. Beery KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP 333 West Wacker Drive, Suite 2600 Chicago, Illinois 60606 Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant American Blind and Wallpaper Factory, Inc.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5/24/04
H (s/electronic-signature-authorized) ON. JEREMY FOGEL Judge of the United States District Court
2
332145.01
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COUNTERCLAIMS AND THIRD-PARTY CLAIMS CASE NO. C 03-5340-JF (EAI)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?