Fox v. Good Samaritan Hospital et al
Filing
260
ORDER SETTING FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Further Case Management Conference set for 1/28/2009 02:30 PM. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/4/08. (rssec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2008)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION RICHARD B. FOX, M.D., Plaintiff, v. GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL, et al., Defendants. ____________________________________/ A further Case Management Conference in this case shall be held on January 28, 2009 at 2:30 p.m. in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, U.S. District Court, 280 South First Street, San Jose, California. No later than January 21, 2009, the parties shall file an updated Joint Case Management Conference Statement. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 11/4/08 RICHARD SEEBORG United States Magistrate Judge No. C 04-00874 RS ORDER SETTING FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE *E-FILED 11/4/08*
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
ORDER SETTING FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT A COPY OF THIS ORDER WAS MAILED TO: Beth Ann Rains McGowen ruth.difalco@bingham.com Eric Peter Schoonveld beth.mcgowen@bingham.com, jerry.webb@bingham.com,
eric@hpslaw.com gshannon@smfs.com
George Albert Shannon , Jr James A. Hennefer Jane Allison Stevens Joseph H. C. Wood
jhennefer@hennefer-wood.com jstevens@hpslaw.com jhcwlaw@yahoo.com mrichardson@smfs.com
Megan Dean Richardson Samantha L Reardon
samantha.reardon@bingham.com
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program. Dated: 11/4/08 /s/ BAK Chambers of Magistrate Judge Richard Seeborg
ORDER SETTING FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?