Digital Envoy Inc., v. Google Inc.,

Filing 147

Attachment 14
DECLARATION of Timothy Kratz in Opposition to [128] Memorandum in Opposition,, [129] Memorandum in Opposition,, [130] Declaration in Support, [131] Declaration in Support, 146 MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery Pursuant to Fed. R. CIv. P. 56(f) Supplemental Declaration for Timothy Kratz in Opposition to Google's Two Motions for Summary Judgement and In Support of Digital Envoy's Motion Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 (f) filed byDigital Envoy,Inc.,. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1# 2 Exhibit 2# 3 Exhibit 3# 4 Exhibit 4# 5 Exhibit 5# 6 Exhibit 6# 7 Exhibit 7# 8 Exhibit 8# 9 Exhibit 9# 10 Exhibit 10# 11 Exhibit 11# 12 Exhibit 12# 13 Exhibit 13# 14 Exhibit 14# 15 Exhibit 15)(Related document(s)[128], [129], [130], [131], 146) (Blackman, Brian) (Filed on 5/2/2005)

Download PDF
Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS Document 147-15 Filed 05/02/2005 Page 1 of 4 EXHIBIT 14 4 Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS Document 147-15 C Filed 05/02/2005 Page 2 of 4 P. CRAIG CARDON, Cal . Bar No . 168646 BRIAN R. BLACKMAN, Cal . Bar No . 196996 KENDALL M . BURTON, Cal . Bar No. 228720 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floo r San Francisco, California 94111-4106 Telephone : 15-434-9100 Facsimile : 15-434-394 7 TIMOTHY H . KRATZ (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) LUKE ANDERSON (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) MCGUIRE WOODS, L .L . P 1170 Peachtree Street, N.E ., Suite 2100 Atlanta, Georgia 3030 9 Telephone : 404 .443 .5 500 Facsimile : 404 .443 .575 1 Attorneys for DIGITAL ENVOY, INC . UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION DIGITAL ENVOY, INC ., Plaintiff/Counter defendant, V. ase No . C 04 01497 RS MANUAL FILING NOTIFICATION IN CONNECTION WITH DIGITAL ENVOY'S OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE, INC .'S TWO MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND IN SUPPORT OF DIGITAL ENVOY, INC .'S RULE 56(F) MOTIO N GOOGLE, INC ., Defendant/Counterclaimant . 27 28 -1W02-SF : 5 BA 1 \61452390 .1 MANUAL FILING NOTIFICATIO N Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS Document 147-15 Filed 05/02/2005 Page 3 of 4 DIGITAL ENVOY, INC . v. GOGGLE, INC. MANUAL FILING NOTIFICATIO N Regarding : DIGITAL ENVOY, INC .'S MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF DIGITAL ENVOY, INC .'S RULE 56(F) MOTION ; and SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF TIMOTHY H . KRATZ IN OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE, INC .'S TWO MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND IN SUPPORT OF DIGITAL ENVOY, INC .'S RULE 56(F) MOTION with its attached exhibits be filed under seal to protect information Google has designated as Confidentia l 4 5 6 7 This filing is in paper or physical form only, and is being maintained in the case file in the Clerk's office . If you are a participant in this case, this filing will be served in hard-copy sho rt ly . For information on retrieving this filing directly from the court, please see the cou rt 's main web site at http :// wvwv .cand .uscou rt s .go v under Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ . This filing was not e-filed for the following reason(s) : Voluminous Document (PDF file size larger than the efiling system allows) Unable to Scan Documents Physical Object (description) : 8 9 10 I Non Graphical/Textual Computer File (audio, video, etc .) on CD or other media Item Under Seal Conformance with the Judicial Conference Privacy Policy (General Order 53) . 23 24 25 26 27 28 W 02 -SF :5BA 1 \61452390 .1 Other (description) : MANUAL FILING NOTIFICATION 1 Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS Document 147-15 M Filed 05/02/2005 Page 4 of 4 I DATED : May 2, 200 5 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LL P 2 3 4 5 6 By /s/ Brian Blackman P . CRAIG CARDON BRIAN R . BLACKMAN TIMOTHY H . KRATZ (Pro Hac Vice To Be Applied For) LUKE ANDERSON (Pro Hac Vice To Be Applied For) MCGUIRE WOODS, L .L . P 170 Peachtree Street, N .E ., Suite 2100 Atlanta, Georgia 3030 9 Telephone : 404 .443 .5 706 Facsimile : 404.443 .575 1 Atto rn eys for DIGITAL ENVOY, INC . wog-sF :> BA 1 \61452390 .1 -3ANUAL FILING NOTIFICATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?