Digital Envoy Inc., v. Google Inc.,

Filing 167

ORDER re 166 GRANTING GOOGLE'S REQUEST TO RE-BRIEF ISSUE IN LIGHT OF COURT'S ORDER GRANTING PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/23/05. (rssec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2005)

Download PDF
Digital Envoy Inc., v. Google Inc., Doc. 167 Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS Document 167 Filed 05/23/2005 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION DIGITAL ENVOY, INC., v. Plaintiff, NO. 5:04-cv-1497 RS ORDER GRANTING GOOGLE'S REQUEST TO RE-BRIEF ISSUE IN LIGHT OF COURT'S ORDER GRANTING PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT / *E-FILED 5/23/05* United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 GOOGLE, INC., Defendant. On May 20, 2005, the Court issued an order denying defendant Google's motion for summary judgment as to all claims filed by plaintiff Digital Envoy but granting its motion for partial summary judgment as to the second, third, fourth, and fifth claims for relief. On May 23, 2005, Google filed a request that the Court issue a further ruling specifically addressing Google's argument that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law as to Digital's claim for misappropriation of trade secrets because Digital failed to establish the requisite mens rea required to maintain that intentional tort. In the alternative, Google offered to re-brief the issue in light of the Court's summary judgment order. Based on all papers filed to date, and good cause appearing therefor, the Court orders both parties to file supplemental briefs addressing the sole issue of the mens rea which must be established in order to sustain the claim for trade secret misappropriation. The supplemental briefs shall be filed on or before June 3, 2005 and shall not exceed five (5) pages in length. Dockets.Justia.com Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS Document 167 Filed 05/23/2005 Page 2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Upon the filing of the supplemental briefs, Google's request that the Court issue a further ruling will be submitted on the papers and no further hearing regarding this issue shall be conducted. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 23, 2005 /s/ Richard Seeborg RICHARD SEEBORG United States Magistrate Judge United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS Document 167 Filed 05/23/2005 Page 3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT NOTICE OF THIS ORDER WAS ELECTRONICALLY PROVIDED TO: Brian R. Blackman P. Craig Cardon bblackman@sheppardmullin.com ccardon@sheppardmullin.com, msariano@sheppardmullin.com tgraves@wsgr.com sholmes@wsgr.com, pmarquez@wsgr.com dkramer@wsgr.com, dgrubbs@wsgr.com mkwun@google.com dlansky@wsgr.com Charles Tait Graves Stephen C. Holmes David H. Kramer Michael S. Kwun David L. Lansky Chan S. Park cpark@wsgr.com United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the Court's CM/ECF program. Dated: May 23, 2005 Chambers of Judge Richard Seeborg By: /s/ BAK 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?