Digital Envoy Inc., v. Google Inc.,

Filing 186

Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS

Document 186

Filed 06/07/2005

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

DAVID H. KRAMER, State Bar No. 168452 ([e-mail]) DAVID L. LANSKY, State Bar No. 199952 ([e-mail]) WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Telephone: [phone] *E-FILED 6/7/05* Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant Google Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

DIGITAL ENVOY, INC., Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, v. GOOGLE INC., Defendant/Counterclaimant.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CASE NO.: C 04 01497 RS [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT AND COUNTERCLAIMANT GOOGLE INC.'S MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 79-5 Judge: Hon. Richard Seeborg Courtroom: 4, 5th Floor Date: June 22, 2005 Time: 9:30 a.m

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MISC. ADMIN. REQUEST TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL CASE NO.: C04-01497 RS

2666833_1.DOC

Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS

Document 186

Filed 06/07/2005

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Having considered Defendant and counterclaimant Google Inc.'s Administrative Request to File Documents Under Seal Pursuant to Local Rule 79-5 lodged with the Court on June 1, 2005, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that the following documents shall be filed under seal: 1. Confidential unredacted version of Google Inc.'s Opposition to Digital Envoy's Motion to Compel Further Responses to Its First and Second Sets of Interrogatories and Its First and Second Sets of Requests for Production of Documents to Google Inc.; 2. Confidential unredacted version of Google Inc.'s Opposition to Digital Envoy's Motion to Compel Further Responses to Requests for Production of Documents Nos. 3, 14, 18, 19 and 26; 3. Declaration of Kim Malone in Support of Google Inc.'s Opposition to Digital Envoy's Motion to Compel Further Responses to Interrogatories and Document Requests; 4. Declaration of David DiNucci in Opposition to Digital Envoy's Motion to Compel Further Responses to Requests for Production of Documents; and 5. Exhibits C, D and F to the Declaration of David H. Kramer in Support of Google Inc.'s Oppositions to Digital Envoy's Motions to Compel.

IT IS SO ORDERED. June 7, 2005 Dated:___________________ /s/ Richard Seeborg __________________________________ Magistrate Judge Richard Seeborg

-1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MISC. ADMIN. REQUEST TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL CASE NO.: C04-01497 RS