Digital Envoy Inc., v. Google Inc.,

Filing 22

STIPULATION AND ORDER REALIGNING PARTIES AND WITHDRAWING MOTION TO TRANSFER AND/OR STAY. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on June 28, 2004. (rslc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2004)

Download PDF
Digital Envoy Inc., v. Google Inc., Doc. 22 Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS Document 22 Filed 06/28/2004 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DAVID H. KRAMER, State Bar No. 168452 DAVID L. LANSKY, State Bar No. 199952 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Telephone: (650) 493-9300 Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 Attorneys for Plaintiff Google Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION GOOGLE INC., Plaintiff, v. DIGITAL ENVOY, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: C 04 01497 RS STIPULATION AND ORDER REALIGNING PARTIES AND WITHDRAWING MOTION TO TRANSFER AND/OR STAY The parties, through their undersigned counsel, stipulate and agree as follows: 1. Digital Envoy's pending motion to dismiss for improper venue or, in the alternative, to stay the instant action is hereby withdrawn and the associated hearing date is hereby vacated; 2. Digital Envoy is hereby reclassified as the plaintiff/counterdefendant in this action and the counterclaims asserted against Google in Digital Envoy's Answer are hereby reclassified as Digital Envoy's claims against Google; 3. Google is hereby reclassified as the defendant/counterclaimant in this action and the claims asserted against Digital Envoy in Google's Complaint are hereby reclassified as Google's counterclaims against Digital Envoy; STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REALIGNING PARTIES AND WITHDRAWING MOTION TO TRANSFER/STAY Case No: C 04 01497 RS Dockets.Justia.com Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS Document 22 Filed 06/28/2004 Page 2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4. On a going forward basis, the caption of this litigation will be modified to reflect the realignment of parties; and 5. Except as provided for in paragraph 1 herein, all pending dates, deadlines and periods of time in this case shall remain unchanged and be unaffected by the reclassification of the parties. IT IS SO STIPULATED: Dated: June 24, 2004 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation David H. Kramer David L. Lansky 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304 Telephone: (650) 493-9300 Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 By: /s/ David L. Lansky David L. Lansky Attorneys for Google Inc. Dated: June 24, 2004 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP P. Craig Cardon Brian R. Blackman Kendall M. Burton Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-4106 Telephone: (415) 434-9100 Facsimile: (415) 434-3947 /s/ P. Craig Cardon P. Craig Cardon Attorneys for Digital Envoy, Inc. By: XXXXXXXXX [PROPOSED] ORDER Upon Stipulation of the Parties and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 6/28/04 /s/ Richard Seeborg Honorable Richard Seeborg United States Magistrate Judge -2- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REALIGNING PARTIES AND WITHDRAWING MOTION TO TRANSFER/STAY Case No: C 04 01497 RS Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS Document 22 Filed 06/28/2004 Page 3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REALIGNING PARTIES AND WITHDRAWING MOTION TO TRANSFER/STAY Case No: C 04 01497 RS CERTIFICATION I, David L. Lansky, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Realigning Parties and Withdrawing Motion to Transfer and/or Stay. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that both parties have concurred in this filing. DATED: June 24, 2004 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation By: /s/ David L. Lansky David L. Lansky Attorneys for Google Inc. -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?