Digital Envoy Inc., v. Google Inc.,

Filing 224

Attachment 2
Declaration in Support of 223 MOTION for Leave to File Digital Envoy's Motion for Reconsideration Declaration of John Lockett filed byDigital Envoy,Inc.,. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B)(Related document(s)223) (Blackman, Brian) (Filed on 7/6/2005)

Download PDF
Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS Document 224-3 Filed 07/06/2005 Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT B 1 Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS Document 224-3 Filed 07/06/2005 Page 2 of 2 DIGITAL ENVOY, INC . v. GOGGLE, INC . MANUAL FILING NOTIFICATION Regarding : EXHIBIT B ATTACHED TO DECLARATION OF JOHN A . LOCKETT, III, IN SUPPORT OF DIGITAL ENVOY'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION This filing is in paper or physical form only, and is being maintained in the case file in the Clerk's office. If you are a participant in this case, this filing will be served in hard-copy shortly . For information on retrieving this filing directly from the court, please see the court's main web site at h ttp ://www .cand .uscourts .go v under Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) . This filing was not e-filed for the following reason(s) : Voluminous Document (PDF file size larger than the efiling system allows) Unable to Scan Document s Physical Object (description) : _ Non Graphical/Textual Computer File (audio, video, etc .) on CD or other media Item Under Seal Conformance with the Judicial Conference Privacy Policy (General Order 53) . Other (description) : DATED : July 6, 2005 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LL P By /s/ Brian Blackman P . CRAIG CARDON BRIAN R. BLACKMAN TIMOTHY H . KRATZ (Pro Hac Vice To Be Applied For) LUKE ANDERSON (Pro Hac Vice To Be Applied For) MCGUIRE WOODS, L .L . P 170 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 2100 Atlanta, Georgia 3030 9 Telephone : 404 .443 .5706 Facsimile : 404.443 .575 1 Attorneys for DIGITAL ENVOY, INC . -2- W02-SF :51313161460202 .1 MANUAL FILING NOTIFICATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?